使用以结果为导向的监测工具加强全球卫生问责:来自欧洲委员会/世卫组织“加强卫生系统促进全民健康覆盖”规划的经验教训。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015536
Maria Roura, Eva Capa, Bernd Appelt, Michel Lecomte, Maria Fernandez, Gerard Schmets, Denis Porignon
{"title":"使用以结果为导向的监测工具加强全球卫生问责:来自欧洲委员会/世卫组织“加强卫生系统促进全民健康覆盖”规划的经验教训。","authors":"Maria Roura, Eva Capa, Bernd Appelt, Michel Lecomte, Maria Fernandez, Gerard Schmets, Denis Porignon","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Governments and organisations must demonstrate accountability and delivery of results. Results-Oriented Monitoring (ROM) is a European Commission mechanism aiming at enhancing internal control and management. The Health System Strengthening (HSS) for Universal Health Coverage (UHC) programme provides support towards achieving UHC through policy dialogue in 115 countries.Drawing from the ROM review of the HSS for UHC programme, we examine the value of the Commission's ROM system as a tool to enhance accountability of large Global Health (GH) programmes. We present the lessons learnt and provide specific recommendations about how ROM tools can be employed to strengthen GH accountability.ROM reviews can provide critical data to inform the design, implementation and evaluation of large-scale GH programmes through a well-integrated mixed-methods approach in which quantitative and qualitative components reinforce each other. Recognising the tremendous power of measures of performance, they track available quantitative indicators from baseline to target along the results chain. Firmly grounded on qualitative tools, they also capture the complex nature of health systems, and the critical influence of contextual factors and stakeholder dynamics.Poor data quality and insufficient multistakeholder engagement are persisting but not unsurmountable challenges. As increasing support is provided to strengthen health information and management systems, the process of codeveloping Monitoring and Evaluation frameworks at country level could serve as a tool to enhance mutistakeholder engagement in policy dialogue. The political nature of both results-oriented systems and GH programmes suggests that mechanisms to assess power dynamics should be incorporated into policy dialogues and ROM review processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Results-Oriented Monitoring tools to enhance global health accountability: lessons from the European Commission/WHO 'Health Systems Strengthening for Universal Health Coverage' programme.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Roura, Eva Capa, Bernd Appelt, Michel Lecomte, Maria Fernandez, Gerard Schmets, Denis Porignon\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Governments and organisations must demonstrate accountability and delivery of results. Results-Oriented Monitoring (ROM) is a European Commission mechanism aiming at enhancing internal control and management. The Health System Strengthening (HSS) for Universal Health Coverage (UHC) programme provides support towards achieving UHC through policy dialogue in 115 countries.Drawing from the ROM review of the HSS for UHC programme, we examine the value of the Commission's ROM system as a tool to enhance accountability of large Global Health (GH) programmes. We present the lessons learnt and provide specific recommendations about how ROM tools can be employed to strengthen GH accountability.ROM reviews can provide critical data to inform the design, implementation and evaluation of large-scale GH programmes through a well-integrated mixed-methods approach in which quantitative and qualitative components reinforce each other. Recognising the tremendous power of measures of performance, they track available quantitative indicators from baseline to target along the results chain. Firmly grounded on qualitative tools, they also capture the complex nature of health systems, and the critical influence of contextual factors and stakeholder dynamics.Poor data quality and insufficient multistakeholder engagement are persisting but not unsurmountable challenges. As increasing support is provided to strengthen health information and management systems, the process of codeveloping Monitoring and Evaluation frameworks at country level could serve as a tool to enhance mutistakeholder engagement in policy dialogue. The political nature of both results-oriented systems and GH programmes suggests that mechanisms to assess power dynamics should be incorporated into policy dialogues and ROM review processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"9 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751940/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015536\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015536","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政府和组织必须展示问责制和成果交付。结果导向监测(ROM)是欧盟委员会旨在加强内部控制和管理的机制。加强卫生系统促进全民健康覆盖规划通过在115个国家开展政策对话,为实现全民健康覆盖提供支持。根据对全民健康覆盖规划HSS的ROM审查,我们审查了委员会的ROM系统作为加强大型全球卫生规划问责制的工具的价值。我们提出了经验教训,并就如何利用ROM工具加强GH问责制提出了具体建议。ROM审查可以提供关键数据,通过数量和质量成分相互加强的综合混合方法,为大规模生长激素规划的设计、实施和评价提供信息。认识到绩效衡量的巨大力量,他们沿着结果链跟踪从基线到目标的可用定量指标。它们牢固地建立在定性工具的基础上,还抓住了卫生系统的复杂性,以及环境因素和利益攸关方动态的关键影响。数据质量差和多方利益相关者参与不足是持续存在但并非不可克服的挑战。随着为加强卫生信息和管理系统提供越来越多的支持,在国家一级共同制定监测和评价框架的进程可以作为加强多方利益攸关方参与政策对话的工具。注重结果的制度和保健方案的政治性质表明,应将评估权力动态的机制纳入政策对话和只读审查进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of Results-Oriented Monitoring tools to enhance global health accountability: lessons from the European Commission/WHO 'Health Systems Strengthening for Universal Health Coverage' programme.

Governments and organisations must demonstrate accountability and delivery of results. Results-Oriented Monitoring (ROM) is a European Commission mechanism aiming at enhancing internal control and management. The Health System Strengthening (HSS) for Universal Health Coverage (UHC) programme provides support towards achieving UHC through policy dialogue in 115 countries.Drawing from the ROM review of the HSS for UHC programme, we examine the value of the Commission's ROM system as a tool to enhance accountability of large Global Health (GH) programmes. We present the lessons learnt and provide specific recommendations about how ROM tools can be employed to strengthen GH accountability.ROM reviews can provide critical data to inform the design, implementation and evaluation of large-scale GH programmes through a well-integrated mixed-methods approach in which quantitative and qualitative components reinforce each other. Recognising the tremendous power of measures of performance, they track available quantitative indicators from baseline to target along the results chain. Firmly grounded on qualitative tools, they also capture the complex nature of health systems, and the critical influence of contextual factors and stakeholder dynamics.Poor data quality and insufficient multistakeholder engagement are persisting but not unsurmountable challenges. As increasing support is provided to strengthen health information and management systems, the process of codeveloping Monitoring and Evaluation frameworks at country level could serve as a tool to enhance mutistakeholder engagement in policy dialogue. The political nature of both results-oriented systems and GH programmes suggests that mechanisms to assess power dynamics should be incorporated into policy dialogues and ROM review processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Age- and sex-specific incidence rates and future projections for hip fractures in Zimbabwe. Strengthening advanced therapy for sickle cell disease in Africa: experience from sickle cell disease centre in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. How climate change is shaping young people's health: a participatory, youth co-led study from Bangladesh, Guatemala and Nigeria. Exploring the burden of cholera in the WHO African region: patterns and trends from 2000 to 2023 cholera outbreak data. Gender equality and quality of life must be central to the design and delivery of sanitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1