STSimM:一种评估神经元模型性能和检测尖峰序列相似性的新工具。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Neuroscience Methods Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110324
A. Marasco , C.A. Lupascu , C. Tribuzi
{"title":"STSimM:一种评估神经元模型性能和检测尖峰序列相似性的新工具。","authors":"A. Marasco ,&nbsp;C.A. Lupascu ,&nbsp;C. Tribuzi","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>In computational neuroscience, performance measures are essential for quantitatively assessing the predictive power of neuron models, while similarity measures are used to estimate the level of synchrony between two or more spike trains. Most of the measures proposed in the literature require setting an appropriate time-scale and often neglect silent periods.</div></div><div><h3>New method:</h3><div>Four time-scale adaptive performance and similarity measures are proposed and implemented in the <em>STSimM</em> (Spike Trains Similarity Measures) Python tool. These measures are designed to accurately capture both the precise timing of individual spikes and shared periods of inactivity among spike trains.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The proposed ST-measures demonstrate enhanced sensitivity over <em>Spike-contrast</em> and <em>SPIKE-distance</em> in detecting spike train similarity, aligning closely with <em>SPIKE-synchronization</em>. Correlations among all similarity measures were observed in Poisson datasets, whereas in vivo-like synaptic stimulations showed correlations only between ST-measures and SPIKE-synchronization.</div></div><div><h3>Comparison of existing method:</h3><div>The <em>STSimM</em> measures are compared with <em>SPIKE-distance</em>, SPIKE-synchronization and <em>Spike-contrast</em> using four spike train datasets with varying similarity levels.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>ST-measures appear more suitable for detecting both the precise timing of single spikes and shared periods of inactivity among spike trains compared to those considered in this work. Their flexibility originates from two primary factors: firstly, the inclusion of four key measures — ST-Accuracy, ST-Precision, ST-Recall, ST-Fscore — capable of discerning similarity levels across neuronal activity, whether interleaved with silent periods or solely focusing on spike timing accuracy; secondly, the integration of three model parameters that govern both precise spike detection and the weighting of silent periods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"415 ","pages":"Article 110324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STSimM: A new tool for evaluating neuron model performance and detecting spike trains similarity\",\"authors\":\"A. Marasco ,&nbsp;C.A. Lupascu ,&nbsp;C. Tribuzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>In computational neuroscience, performance measures are essential for quantitatively assessing the predictive power of neuron models, while similarity measures are used to estimate the level of synchrony between two or more spike trains. Most of the measures proposed in the literature require setting an appropriate time-scale and often neglect silent periods.</div></div><div><h3>New method:</h3><div>Four time-scale adaptive performance and similarity measures are proposed and implemented in the <em>STSimM</em> (Spike Trains Similarity Measures) Python tool. These measures are designed to accurately capture both the precise timing of individual spikes and shared periods of inactivity among spike trains.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The proposed ST-measures demonstrate enhanced sensitivity over <em>Spike-contrast</em> and <em>SPIKE-distance</em> in detecting spike train similarity, aligning closely with <em>SPIKE-synchronization</em>. Correlations among all similarity measures were observed in Poisson datasets, whereas in vivo-like synaptic stimulations showed correlations only between ST-measures and SPIKE-synchronization.</div></div><div><h3>Comparison of existing method:</h3><div>The <em>STSimM</em> measures are compared with <em>SPIKE-distance</em>, SPIKE-synchronization and <em>Spike-contrast</em> using four spike train datasets with varying similarity levels.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>ST-measures appear more suitable for detecting both the precise timing of single spikes and shared periods of inactivity among spike trains compared to those considered in this work. Their flexibility originates from two primary factors: firstly, the inclusion of four key measures — ST-Accuracy, ST-Precision, ST-Recall, ST-Fscore — capable of discerning similarity levels across neuronal activity, whether interleaved with silent periods or solely focusing on spike timing accuracy; secondly, the integration of three model parameters that govern both precise spike detection and the weighting of silent periods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"volume\":\"415 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027024002693\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027024002693","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在计算神经科学中,性能测量对于定量评估神经元模型的预测能力至关重要,而相似性测量用于估计两个或多个尖峰序列之间的同步水平。文献中提出的大多数措施都需要设置适当的时间尺度,而往往忽略了沉默期。新方法:在STSimM (Spike Trains similarity measures) Python工具中提出并实现了四种时间尺度自适应性能和相似性度量。这些措施的目的是准确地捕捉到个体尖峰的精确时间和尖峰列车之间共享的不活动时期。结果:所提出的st测量方法在检测尖峰序列相似性方面表现出比尖峰对比度和尖峰距离更高的灵敏度,与尖峰同步密切一致。在泊松数据集中观察到所有相似性测量之间的相关性,而在体内样突触刺激中仅显示st测量和spike同步之间的相关性。现有方法的比较:使用四个不同相似度的尖峰序列数据集,将STSimM方法与尖峰距离、尖峰同步和尖峰对比进行比较。结论:与本研究中考虑的方法相比,st测量方法似乎更适合于检测单个尖峰的精确时间和尖峰序列之间的共同不活动时间。它们的灵活性源于两个主要因素:首先,包括四个关键措施- st -准确性,st -精度,st -召回,st - fscore -能够识别神经元活动的相似性水平,是否与沉默期交织或仅关注尖峰时间准确性;其次,对控制精确尖峰检测和沉默周期权重的三个模型参数进行了集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
STSimM: A new tool for evaluating neuron model performance and detecting spike trains similarity

Background:

In computational neuroscience, performance measures are essential for quantitatively assessing the predictive power of neuron models, while similarity measures are used to estimate the level of synchrony between two or more spike trains. Most of the measures proposed in the literature require setting an appropriate time-scale and often neglect silent periods.

New method:

Four time-scale adaptive performance and similarity measures are proposed and implemented in the STSimM (Spike Trains Similarity Measures) Python tool. These measures are designed to accurately capture both the precise timing of individual spikes and shared periods of inactivity among spike trains.

Results:

The proposed ST-measures demonstrate enhanced sensitivity over Spike-contrast and SPIKE-distance in detecting spike train similarity, aligning closely with SPIKE-synchronization. Correlations among all similarity measures were observed in Poisson datasets, whereas in vivo-like synaptic stimulations showed correlations only between ST-measures and SPIKE-synchronization.

Comparison of existing method:

The STSimM measures are compared with SPIKE-distance, SPIKE-synchronization and Spike-contrast using four spike train datasets with varying similarity levels.

Conclusion:

ST-measures appear more suitable for detecting both the precise timing of single spikes and shared periods of inactivity among spike trains compared to those considered in this work. Their flexibility originates from two primary factors: firstly, the inclusion of four key measures — ST-Accuracy, ST-Precision, ST-Recall, ST-Fscore — capable of discerning similarity levels across neuronal activity, whether interleaved with silent periods or solely focusing on spike timing accuracy; secondly, the integration of three model parameters that govern both precise spike detection and the weighting of silent periods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of voluntary drug and alcohol intake in Drosophila melanogaster using a modified one-tube capillary feeding assay Optimization of permeabilized brain tissue preparation to improve the analysis of mitochondrial oxidative capacities in specific subregions of the rat brain Discrete variational autoencoders BERT model-based transcranial focused ultrasound for Alzheimer's disease detection EEG-based fatigue state evaluation by combining complex network and frequency-spatial features Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1