药包球囊导管治疗股腘动脉狭窄上市前临床试验中合适替代终点的考虑。

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1177/15266028241300861
Jun Hao, Duoer Wang, Yanyan Zhao, Yingxuan Zhu, Tenzin Tinley, Weida Liu, Wei Li, Chuangshi Wang, Yang Wang
{"title":"药包球囊导管治疗股腘动脉狭窄上市前临床试验中合适替代终点的考虑。","authors":"Jun Hao, Duoer Wang, Yanyan Zhao, Yingxuan Zhu, Tenzin Tinley, Weida Liu, Wei Li, Chuangshi Wang, Yang Wang","doi":"10.1177/15266028241300861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Most clinical trials of drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery stenosis chose 12-month primary patency rate (PPR) or 6-month late lumen loss (LLL) as the primary endpoint. It is still debatable whether 6-month LLL can be served as an appropriate surrogate endpoint for 12-month PPR. This study aimed to identify whether LLL can serve as an appropriate surrogate endpoint in peripheral DCB clinical trials, and shed light on the selection of primary outcome for subsequent confirmatory clinical trials of DCB in the treatment of femoropopliteal artery stenosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The linear regression model was used to evaluate the correlation between 12-month PPR and 6-month LLL. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) and relative gain between the DCB and plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) group were computed to assess the consistency and surrogacy, using fixed or random effect model as appropriate. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for both endpoints to compare their degree of variation overall and at study level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34 studies are eligible for this study. A significant negative linear correlation was found between 12-month PPR and 6-month LLL (R<sup>2</sup>=0.67, slope=-0.309, p=0.007). The SMD (DCB-POBA) of LLL and PPR was -0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.98, -0.54), and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.72) (p=0.18). The pooled relative gain of PPR (43%, 95% CI: 35%, 50%) was significantly lower than that of LLL (72%, 95% CI: 61%, 84%) (p<0.001). Coefficient of variation of LLL was larger than that of PPR overall in DCB and POBA groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although a significant moderate correlation was observed between 12-month PPR and 6-month LLL, PPR shows more conservative and robust than LLL, which may exaggerate clinical benefits. Late lumen loss should be used discreetly depending on different situations and clinical benefits for patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>This study addresses the critical issue of primary endpoint selection in clinical trials of drug-coated balloon for femoropopliteal artery stenosis. By elucidating the moderate correlation between 6-month late lumen loss (LLL) and 12-month primary patency rate (PPR), the findings underscore the limitations of LLL as a surrogate endpoint due to its variability and potential to overstate clinical benefits. The study advocates for the use of 12-month PPR as a more robust and conservative endpoint in pivotal trials, particularly for novel devices. These findings provide clinicians with a nuanced understanding of outcome measures, promoting evidence-based decision-making and regulatory alignment to ensure patient benefits in vascular interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028241300861"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Consideration of Appropriate Surrogate Endpoint in Premarket Clinical Trials of Drug-Coated Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery Stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Hao, Duoer Wang, Yanyan Zhao, Yingxuan Zhu, Tenzin Tinley, Weida Liu, Wei Li, Chuangshi Wang, Yang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15266028241300861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Most clinical trials of drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery stenosis chose 12-month primary patency rate (PPR) or 6-month late lumen loss (LLL) as the primary endpoint. It is still debatable whether 6-month LLL can be served as an appropriate surrogate endpoint for 12-month PPR. This study aimed to identify whether LLL can serve as an appropriate surrogate endpoint in peripheral DCB clinical trials, and shed light on the selection of primary outcome for subsequent confirmatory clinical trials of DCB in the treatment of femoropopliteal artery stenosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The linear regression model was used to evaluate the correlation between 12-month PPR and 6-month LLL. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) and relative gain between the DCB and plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) group were computed to assess the consistency and surrogacy, using fixed or random effect model as appropriate. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for both endpoints to compare their degree of variation overall and at study level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34 studies are eligible for this study. A significant negative linear correlation was found between 12-month PPR and 6-month LLL (R<sup>2</sup>=0.67, slope=-0.309, p=0.007). The SMD (DCB-POBA) of LLL and PPR was -0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.98, -0.54), and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.72) (p=0.18). The pooled relative gain of PPR (43%, 95% CI: 35%, 50%) was significantly lower than that of LLL (72%, 95% CI: 61%, 84%) (p<0.001). Coefficient of variation of LLL was larger than that of PPR overall in DCB and POBA groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although a significant moderate correlation was observed between 12-month PPR and 6-month LLL, PPR shows more conservative and robust than LLL, which may exaggerate clinical benefits. Late lumen loss should be used discreetly depending on different situations and clinical benefits for patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>This study addresses the critical issue of primary endpoint selection in clinical trials of drug-coated balloon for femoropopliteal artery stenosis. By elucidating the moderate correlation between 6-month late lumen loss (LLL) and 12-month primary patency rate (PPR), the findings underscore the limitations of LLL as a surrogate endpoint due to its variability and potential to overstate clinical benefits. The study advocates for the use of 12-month PPR as a more robust and conservative endpoint in pivotal trials, particularly for novel devices. These findings provide clinicians with a nuanced understanding of outcome measures, promoting evidence-based decision-making and regulatory alignment to ensure patient benefits in vascular interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15266028241300861\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028241300861\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028241300861","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大多数药物包被球囊(DCB)治疗股腘动脉狭窄的临床试验选择12个月原发性通畅率(PPR)或6个月晚期管腔损失(LLL)作为主要终点。6个月LLL是否可以作为12个月PPR的合适替代终点仍然存在争议。本研究旨在确定LLL是否可以作为外周DCB临床试验的合适替代终点,并为后续DCB治疗股腘动脉狭窄的确证性临床试验的主要结局选择提供参考。材料与方法:采用线性回归模型评价12个月PPR与6个月LLL的相关性。计算DCB和普通旧球囊血管成形术(POBA)组之间的合并标准化平均差异(SMDs)和相对增益,以评估一致性和替代性,酌情使用固定或随机效应模型。计算两个终点的变异系数(CV),比较它们在总体和研究水平上的变异程度。结果:共有34项研究符合本研究的条件。12个月PPR与6个月LLL呈显著的负线性相关(R2=0.67,斜率=-0.309,p=0.007)。LLL和PPR的SMD (DCB-POBA)分别为-0.76(95%可信区间[CI]: -0.98, -0.54)和0.59 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.72) (p=0.18)。PPR的综合相对获益(43%,95% CI: 35%, 50%)明显低于LLL (72%, 95% CI: 61%, 84%)(结论:尽管12个月PPR和6个月LLL之间存在显著的中度相关性,但PPR比LLL表现出更保守和稳健,这可能夸大了临床获益。根据不同的情况和患者的临床益处,应谨慎使用晚期管腔损失。临床影响:本研究解决了药物包被球囊治疗股腘动脉狭窄临床试验中主要终点选择的关键问题。通过阐明6个月晚期管腔损失(LLL)与12个月原发性通畅率(PPR)之间的中度相关性,研究结果强调了LLL作为替代终点的局限性,因为它的可变性和可能夸大临床益处。该研究提倡在关键试验中使用12个月PPR作为更稳健和保守的终点,特别是对于新型装置。这些发现为临床医生提供了对结果测量的细致理解,促进了基于证据的决策和监管一致性,以确保患者在血管干预中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Consideration of Appropriate Surrogate Endpoint in Premarket Clinical Trials of Drug-Coated Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery Stenosis.

Purpose: Most clinical trials of drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery stenosis chose 12-month primary patency rate (PPR) or 6-month late lumen loss (LLL) as the primary endpoint. It is still debatable whether 6-month LLL can be served as an appropriate surrogate endpoint for 12-month PPR. This study aimed to identify whether LLL can serve as an appropriate surrogate endpoint in peripheral DCB clinical trials, and shed light on the selection of primary outcome for subsequent confirmatory clinical trials of DCB in the treatment of femoropopliteal artery stenosis.

Materials and methods: The linear regression model was used to evaluate the correlation between 12-month PPR and 6-month LLL. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) and relative gain between the DCB and plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) group were computed to assess the consistency and surrogacy, using fixed or random effect model as appropriate. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for both endpoints to compare their degree of variation overall and at study level.

Results: A total of 34 studies are eligible for this study. A significant negative linear correlation was found between 12-month PPR and 6-month LLL (R2=0.67, slope=-0.309, p=0.007). The SMD (DCB-POBA) of LLL and PPR was -0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.98, -0.54), and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.72) (p=0.18). The pooled relative gain of PPR (43%, 95% CI: 35%, 50%) was significantly lower than that of LLL (72%, 95% CI: 61%, 84%) (p<0.001). Coefficient of variation of LLL was larger than that of PPR overall in DCB and POBA groups.

Conclusion: Although a significant moderate correlation was observed between 12-month PPR and 6-month LLL, PPR shows more conservative and robust than LLL, which may exaggerate clinical benefits. Late lumen loss should be used discreetly depending on different situations and clinical benefits for patients.

Clinical impact: This study addresses the critical issue of primary endpoint selection in clinical trials of drug-coated balloon for femoropopliteal artery stenosis. By elucidating the moderate correlation between 6-month late lumen loss (LLL) and 12-month primary patency rate (PPR), the findings underscore the limitations of LLL as a surrogate endpoint due to its variability and potential to overstate clinical benefits. The study advocates for the use of 12-month PPR as a more robust and conservative endpoint in pivotal trials, particularly for novel devices. These findings provide clinicians with a nuanced understanding of outcome measures, promoting evidence-based decision-making and regulatory alignment to ensure patient benefits in vascular interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
Transapical to Femoral Through-and-Through Wire Technique for Ruptured Aortic Arch Aneurysm Management: Case Report and Review of Literature. Percutaneous Superficial Temporal Artery Access Facilitating Carotid Artery Stenting Performed From Distal Radial Artery. Stent Implantation and Thromboendarterectomy for the Common Femoral Artery in Real-World Practice. Endovascular Treatment for Isolated Infected Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Initial Clinical Experience With AneuFix Injectable Biocompatible Elastomer for Translumbar Embolization of Type 2 Endoleaks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1