先天性食管闭锁患儿伴或不伴气管食管闭锁的童年教育结局。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY Birth Defects Research Pub Date : 2024-12-08 DOI:10.1002/bdr2.2417
Nahed O. ElHassan, Ruiqi Cen, Charles P. Pugh, Chary Akmyradov, Jun Ying, Anthony Goudie, Wendy N. Nembhard
{"title":"先天性食管闭锁患儿伴或不伴气管食管闭锁的童年教育结局。","authors":"Nahed O. ElHassan,&nbsp;Ruiqi Cen,&nbsp;Charles P. Pugh,&nbsp;Chary Akmyradov,&nbsp;Jun Ying,&nbsp;Anthony Goudie,&nbsp;Wendy N. Nembhard","doi":"10.1002/bdr2.2417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There are limited studies on educational outcomes of children born with esophageal atresia (EA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). We aimed to compare 3rd to 5th grade academic proficiency among children born with EA/TEF versus unaffected children.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Children born with EA/TEF (2000–2005) were identified from the Arkansas Reproductive Health Monitoring System. For each child born with EA/TEF, up to two unaffected children were selected from birth certificates and matched on hospital and month of birth, sex, and race and ethnicity. Data on NICU hospitalization were abstracted from medical records at Arkansas' only pediatric specialty hospital. The study outcomes were 3rd to 5th grade proficiency on literacy and mathematic standardized achievement tests, referral to special education, and days of school absence. Regression models were used to assess the association of outcome measures with diagnosis of EA/TEF, after adjusting for differences in covariates between EA/TEF and unaffected children and accounting for paired correlations using the generalized estimating equation method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The final cohort included 20 surviving children born with EA/TEF and 31 unaffected children. There was no significant difference in literacy (3rd: 70% vs. 71%; 4th: 83% vs. 81%; 5th: 94% vs. 87%, p &gt; 0.05) or mathematics proficiency (3rd: 80% vs. 87%; 4th: 83% vs. 78%; 5th: 75% vs. 78%, <i>p</i> &gt; 0.05), referral to special education (20% vs. 19%, <i>p</i> = 0.65), or total days of school absence (47 vs. 26 days, <i>p</i> = 0.07) between EA/TEF and unaffected children.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Children born with EA/TEF had comparable academic proficiency to unaffected children.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9121,"journal":{"name":"Birth Defects Research","volume":"116 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Childhood Educational Outcomes of Infants Born With Esophageal Atresia With or Without Tracheoesophageal Atresia\",\"authors\":\"Nahed O. ElHassan,&nbsp;Ruiqi Cen,&nbsp;Charles P. Pugh,&nbsp;Chary Akmyradov,&nbsp;Jun Ying,&nbsp;Anthony Goudie,&nbsp;Wendy N. Nembhard\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bdr2.2417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>There are limited studies on educational outcomes of children born with esophageal atresia (EA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). We aimed to compare 3rd to 5th grade academic proficiency among children born with EA/TEF versus unaffected children.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Children born with EA/TEF (2000–2005) were identified from the Arkansas Reproductive Health Monitoring System. For each child born with EA/TEF, up to two unaffected children were selected from birth certificates and matched on hospital and month of birth, sex, and race and ethnicity. Data on NICU hospitalization were abstracted from medical records at Arkansas' only pediatric specialty hospital. The study outcomes were 3rd to 5th grade proficiency on literacy and mathematic standardized achievement tests, referral to special education, and days of school absence. Regression models were used to assess the association of outcome measures with diagnosis of EA/TEF, after adjusting for differences in covariates between EA/TEF and unaffected children and accounting for paired correlations using the generalized estimating equation method.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The final cohort included 20 surviving children born with EA/TEF and 31 unaffected children. There was no significant difference in literacy (3rd: 70% vs. 71%; 4th: 83% vs. 81%; 5th: 94% vs. 87%, p &gt; 0.05) or mathematics proficiency (3rd: 80% vs. 87%; 4th: 83% vs. 78%; 5th: 75% vs. 78%, <i>p</i> &gt; 0.05), referral to special education (20% vs. 19%, <i>p</i> = 0.65), or total days of school absence (47 vs. 26 days, <i>p</i> = 0.07) between EA/TEF and unaffected children.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Children born with EA/TEF had comparable academic proficiency to unaffected children.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Birth Defects Research\",\"volume\":\"116 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Birth Defects Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdr2.2417\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth Defects Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdr2.2417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于先天性食管闭锁(EA)患儿伴或不伴气管食管瘘(TEF)的教育效果的研究有限。我们的目的是比较出生时患有EA/TEF的儿童与未受影响的儿童的三年级到五年级的学术水平。方法:从阿肯色州生殖健康监测系统中确定2000-2005年出生时患有EA/TEF的儿童。对于每个出生时患有EA/TEF的儿童,从出生证明中选择最多两个未受影响的儿童,并根据医院和出生月份、性别、种族和民族进行匹配。新生儿重症监护病房住院的数据是从阿肯色州唯一一家儿科专科医院的医疗记录中提取的。研究结果包括三到五年级的读写和数学标准化成绩测试的熟练程度,转到特殊教育的情况,以及缺课天数。在调整EA/TEF和未受影响儿童之间协变量的差异,并使用广义估计方程方法考虑配对相关性后,使用回归模型评估结果测量与EA/TEF诊断的相关性。结果:最终队列包括20名出生时患有EA/TEF的幸存儿童和31名未受影响的儿童。在读写能力方面没有显著差异(第三:70% vs 71%;第4:83% vs. 81%;第五名:94% vs. 87%, p > 0.05)或数学熟练程度(第三名:80% vs. 87%;第4:83% vs. 78%;第5:75%对78%,p > 0.05),转到特殊教育(20%对19%,p = 0.65),或总缺课天数(47对26天,p = 0.07)在EA/TEF和未受影响的儿童之间。结论:出生时患有EA/TEF的儿童与未受影响的儿童具有相当的学术熟练程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Childhood Educational Outcomes of Infants Born With Esophageal Atresia With or Without Tracheoesophageal Atresia

Background

There are limited studies on educational outcomes of children born with esophageal atresia (EA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). We aimed to compare 3rd to 5th grade academic proficiency among children born with EA/TEF versus unaffected children.

Methods

Children born with EA/TEF (2000–2005) were identified from the Arkansas Reproductive Health Monitoring System. For each child born with EA/TEF, up to two unaffected children were selected from birth certificates and matched on hospital and month of birth, sex, and race and ethnicity. Data on NICU hospitalization were abstracted from medical records at Arkansas' only pediatric specialty hospital. The study outcomes were 3rd to 5th grade proficiency on literacy and mathematic standardized achievement tests, referral to special education, and days of school absence. Regression models were used to assess the association of outcome measures with diagnosis of EA/TEF, after adjusting for differences in covariates between EA/TEF and unaffected children and accounting for paired correlations using the generalized estimating equation method.

Results

The final cohort included 20 surviving children born with EA/TEF and 31 unaffected children. There was no significant difference in literacy (3rd: 70% vs. 71%; 4th: 83% vs. 81%; 5th: 94% vs. 87%, p > 0.05) or mathematics proficiency (3rd: 80% vs. 87%; 4th: 83% vs. 78%; 5th: 75% vs. 78%, p > 0.05), referral to special education (20% vs. 19%, p = 0.65), or total days of school absence (47 vs. 26 days, p = 0.07) between EA/TEF and unaffected children.

Conclusions

Children born with EA/TEF had comparable academic proficiency to unaffected children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Birth Defects Research
Birth Defects Research Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: The journal Birth Defects Research publishes original research and reviews in areas related to the etiology of adverse developmental and reproductive outcome. In particular the journal is devoted to the publication of original scientific research that contributes to the understanding of the biology of embryonic development and the prenatal causative factors and mechanisms leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes, namely structural and functional birth defects, pregnancy loss, postnatal functional defects in the human population, and to the identification of prenatal factors and biological mechanisms that reduce these risks. Adverse reproductive and developmental outcomes may have genetic, environmental, nutritional or epigenetic causes. Accordingly, the journal Birth Defects Research takes an integrated, multidisciplinary approach in its organization and publication strategy. The journal Birth Defects Research contains separate sections for clinical and molecular teratology, developmental and reproductive toxicology, and reviews in developmental biology to acknowledge and accommodate the integrative nature of research in this field. Each section has a dedicated editor who is a leader in his/her field and who has full editorial authority in his/her area.
期刊最新文献
A Supra-Numerary Limb Grafted Onto a Sacrococcygeal Mass in a Child With Spinal Dysraphism: Case Report, Dysmorphogenesis, and Management Review Evaluation of the Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Patients With Situs Inversus Totalis Variants in Chromatin Remodeling Genes Are Involved in Patients With Chiari Malformation Type 1. A Generalized Machine Learning Model for Identifying Congenital Heart Defects (CHDs) Using ICD Codes Risk of Congenital Ocular Anomaly After Prenatal Exposure to Medications: A EUROmediCAT Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1