{"title":"术前血压对M-TEER术后预后的影响:悖论还是别的什么?","authors":"Marijana Tadic, Leonhard Schneider, Nicoleta Nita, Dominik Felbel, Michael Paukovitsch, Mathias Gröger, Mirjam Keßler, Wolfang Rottbauer","doi":"10.1002/clc.70062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of systolic blood pressure (SBP) values on admission on the outcome of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methodology</h3>\n \n <p>We included all patients who underwent interventional MV repair in our institution between January 2010 and October 2020. All data are obtained from the MiTra ULM registry. Based on SBP values measured on admission, all patients were divided into four groups: < 120, 120−129, 130−139, and ≥ 140 mmHg.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eight hundred and fifty-eight patients were included in this study. There were no major differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the four observed groups. The patients with SBP on admission ≥ 140 mmHg had the lowest prevalence of functional MR and the highest LVEF. Higher SBP at admission (HR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63−0.87) and preprocedural LVEF values (HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97−0.99) were predictors of lower 1-year mortality but did not impact 1-year hospitalization rate or MACE in the whole study population. When patients were separated into two groups according to the mechanisms of MR (functional and structural), the results showed that higher SBP on admission and better preprocedural LVEF were associated with significantly lower 1-year CV mortality in both groups of patients, with functional and structural MR. Higher SBP at admission was also associated with lower 1-year CV mortality (HR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55−0.96) in patients with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF > 50%), but not with 1-year rehospitalization and MACE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Higher SBP on admission (> 140 mmHg) is an independent predictor of a better 1-year outcome in patients treated with M-TEER. The effect of higher SBP on outcome after M-TEER should be further investigated.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"47 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Preprocedural Blood Pressure on Outcome After M-TEER: The Paradox or Something Else?\",\"authors\":\"Marijana Tadic, Leonhard Schneider, Nicoleta Nita, Dominik Felbel, Michael Paukovitsch, Mathias Gröger, Mirjam Keßler, Wolfang Rottbauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/clc.70062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of systolic blood pressure (SBP) values on admission on the outcome of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methodology</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included all patients who underwent interventional MV repair in our institution between January 2010 and October 2020. All data are obtained from the MiTra ULM registry. Based on SBP values measured on admission, all patients were divided into four groups: < 120, 120−129, 130−139, and ≥ 140 mmHg.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eight hundred and fifty-eight patients were included in this study. There were no major differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the four observed groups. The patients with SBP on admission ≥ 140 mmHg had the lowest prevalence of functional MR and the highest LVEF. Higher SBP at admission (HR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63−0.87) and preprocedural LVEF values (HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97−0.99) were predictors of lower 1-year mortality but did not impact 1-year hospitalization rate or MACE in the whole study population. When patients were separated into two groups according to the mechanisms of MR (functional and structural), the results showed that higher SBP on admission and better preprocedural LVEF were associated with significantly lower 1-year CV mortality in both groups of patients, with functional and structural MR. Higher SBP at admission was also associated with lower 1-year CV mortality (HR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55−0.96) in patients with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF > 50%), but not with 1-year rehospitalization and MACE.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Higher SBP on admission (> 140 mmHg) is an independent predictor of a better 1-year outcome in patients treated with M-TEER. The effect of higher SBP on outcome after M-TEER should be further investigated.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"47 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626250/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70062\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Preprocedural Blood Pressure on Outcome After M-TEER: The Paradox or Something Else?
Objective
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of systolic blood pressure (SBP) values on admission on the outcome of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER).
Methodology
We included all patients who underwent interventional MV repair in our institution between January 2010 and October 2020. All data are obtained from the MiTra ULM registry. Based on SBP values measured on admission, all patients were divided into four groups: < 120, 120−129, 130−139, and ≥ 140 mmHg.
Results
Eight hundred and fifty-eight patients were included in this study. There were no major differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the four observed groups. The patients with SBP on admission ≥ 140 mmHg had the lowest prevalence of functional MR and the highest LVEF. Higher SBP at admission (HR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63−0.87) and preprocedural LVEF values (HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97−0.99) were predictors of lower 1-year mortality but did not impact 1-year hospitalization rate or MACE in the whole study population. When patients were separated into two groups according to the mechanisms of MR (functional and structural), the results showed that higher SBP on admission and better preprocedural LVEF were associated with significantly lower 1-year CV mortality in both groups of patients, with functional and structural MR. Higher SBP at admission was also associated with lower 1-year CV mortality (HR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55−0.96) in patients with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF > 50%), but not with 1-year rehospitalization and MACE.
Conclusion
Higher SBP on admission (> 140 mmHg) is an independent predictor of a better 1-year outcome in patients treated with M-TEER. The effect of higher SBP on outcome after M-TEER should be further investigated.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery.
The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content.
The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.