坐着的人:一项关于空闲时间和工作时间暴露于久坐与精液参数关系的系统综述。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 ANDROLOGY Andrology Pub Date : 2024-12-08 DOI:10.1111/andr.13816
Vittoria Sterpi, Elena Ricci, Francesca Chiaffarino, Francesco Fedele, Giovanna Esposito, Fabio Parazzini, Paola Viganò, Sonia Cipriani
{"title":"坐着的人:一项关于空闲时间和工作时间暴露于久坐与精液参数关系的系统综述。","authors":"Vittoria Sterpi, Elena Ricci, Francesca Chiaffarino, Francesco Fedele, Giovanna Esposito, Fabio Parazzini, Paola Viganò, Sonia Cipriani","doi":"10.1111/andr.13816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past few decades, several studies have found that semen quality parameters have steadily declined over time. Many hypotheses have been made to explain this finding, among which a sedentary lifestyle has been investigated. To synthesize the current evidence, we performed a systematic review of published papers reporting on the relationship between sedentary habits and semen parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase and PubMed were systematically searched for papers published in English up to May 2023. We included all full-text observational papers that reported the relationship between sedentariness and semen parameters. Article selection adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen observational studies were ultimately included, six in healthy men and ten in men from Fertility Clinics. They encompassed a total of 13,509 men, with 9877 being healthy men and 3632 presenting at Fertility Clinics for initial assessment. In terms of semen volume, no association emerged in the six studies involving healthy men: however, results in men referring to fertility clinics mainly showed no association, with one indicating a decline and one higher volume. Twelve studies did not report differences in sperm concentration, while one study in men from Fertility Clinics and two in healthy men observed a decline in this parameter with increasing time spent on TV watching or sedentary posture in spare time. Total sperm count was found to be similar across groups of inactivity, except for one study that showed a significant decrease when men from Fertility Clinics spent more time watching TV. No significant differences were reported in sperm motility across all studies, with only one study, among those addressing sperm morphology, indicating a lower percentage of normal forms in men watching TV more than 3 h per day. Finally, three studies conducted in men referring to Fertility Clinics analyzed the sperm DNA fragmentation index. Two of these studies found a higher DNA fragmentation index in men spending more time per day in a sitting posture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review suggests a weak association between time spent sitting during spare time and sperm concentration, but the findings are inconsistent, highlighting the need for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":7898,"journal":{"name":"Andrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The sitting men: A systematic review of spare and working time exposure to sedentariness in relation to semen parameters.\",\"authors\":\"Vittoria Sterpi, Elena Ricci, Francesca Chiaffarino, Francesco Fedele, Giovanna Esposito, Fabio Parazzini, Paola Viganò, Sonia Cipriani\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/andr.13816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past few decades, several studies have found that semen quality parameters have steadily declined over time. Many hypotheses have been made to explain this finding, among which a sedentary lifestyle has been investigated. To synthesize the current evidence, we performed a systematic review of published papers reporting on the relationship between sedentary habits and semen parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase and PubMed were systematically searched for papers published in English up to May 2023. We included all full-text observational papers that reported the relationship between sedentariness and semen parameters. Article selection adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen observational studies were ultimately included, six in healthy men and ten in men from Fertility Clinics. They encompassed a total of 13,509 men, with 9877 being healthy men and 3632 presenting at Fertility Clinics for initial assessment. In terms of semen volume, no association emerged in the six studies involving healthy men: however, results in men referring to fertility clinics mainly showed no association, with one indicating a decline and one higher volume. Twelve studies did not report differences in sperm concentration, while one study in men from Fertility Clinics and two in healthy men observed a decline in this parameter with increasing time spent on TV watching or sedentary posture in spare time. Total sperm count was found to be similar across groups of inactivity, except for one study that showed a significant decrease when men from Fertility Clinics spent more time watching TV. No significant differences were reported in sperm motility across all studies, with only one study, among those addressing sperm morphology, indicating a lower percentage of normal forms in men watching TV more than 3 h per day. Finally, three studies conducted in men referring to Fertility Clinics analyzed the sperm DNA fragmentation index. Two of these studies found a higher DNA fragmentation index in men spending more time per day in a sitting posture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review suggests a weak association between time spent sitting during spare time and sperm concentration, but the findings are inconsistent, highlighting the need for further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Andrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Andrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13816\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13816","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在过去的几十年里,一些研究发现精液质量参数随着时间的推移稳步下降。人们提出了许多假设来解释这一发现,其中包括久坐不动的生活方式。为了综合目前的证据,我们对已发表的关于久坐习惯与精液参数之间关系的论文进行了系统回顾。方法:系统检索Embase和PubMed截至2023年5月发表的英文论文。我们纳入了所有报道久坐与精液参数之间关系的全文观察性论文。文章选择遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。结果:最终纳入了16项观察性研究,其中6项针对健康男性,10项针对来自生育诊所的男性。他们共包括13,509名男性,其中9877名是健康男性,3632名在生育诊所进行初步评估。就精液量而言,涉及健康男性的六项研究中没有发现任何关联:然而,前往生育诊所的男性的结果主要显示没有关联,一项研究表明精液量下降,一项研究表明精液量增加。12项研究没有报告精子浓度的差异,而一项针对生育诊所的男性的研究和两项针对健康男性的研究发现,随着看电视时间的增加或业余时间久坐不动,精子浓度会下降。除了一项研究表明,当来自生育诊所的男性花更多时间看电视时,精子总数会显著减少外,其他不运动的人群的精子总数相似。在所有的研究中,精子活力没有明显的差异,只有一项研究表明,在那些研究精子形态的研究中,每天看电视超过3小时的男性正常精子的比例较低。最后,参考生育诊所在男性中进行的三项研究分析了精子DNA碎片指数。其中两项研究发现,每天久坐的男性DNA断裂指数更高。结论:这篇综述表明,业余时间坐着的时间与精子浓度之间存在微弱关联,但研究结果并不一致,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The sitting men: A systematic review of spare and working time exposure to sedentariness in relation to semen parameters.

Background: Over the past few decades, several studies have found that semen quality parameters have steadily declined over time. Many hypotheses have been made to explain this finding, among which a sedentary lifestyle has been investigated. To synthesize the current evidence, we performed a systematic review of published papers reporting on the relationship between sedentary habits and semen parameters.

Methods: Embase and PubMed were systematically searched for papers published in English up to May 2023. We included all full-text observational papers that reported the relationship between sedentariness and semen parameters. Article selection adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

Results: Sixteen observational studies were ultimately included, six in healthy men and ten in men from Fertility Clinics. They encompassed a total of 13,509 men, with 9877 being healthy men and 3632 presenting at Fertility Clinics for initial assessment. In terms of semen volume, no association emerged in the six studies involving healthy men: however, results in men referring to fertility clinics mainly showed no association, with one indicating a decline and one higher volume. Twelve studies did not report differences in sperm concentration, while one study in men from Fertility Clinics and two in healthy men observed a decline in this parameter with increasing time spent on TV watching or sedentary posture in spare time. Total sperm count was found to be similar across groups of inactivity, except for one study that showed a significant decrease when men from Fertility Clinics spent more time watching TV. No significant differences were reported in sperm motility across all studies, with only one study, among those addressing sperm morphology, indicating a lower percentage of normal forms in men watching TV more than 3 h per day. Finally, three studies conducted in men referring to Fertility Clinics analyzed the sperm DNA fragmentation index. Two of these studies found a higher DNA fragmentation index in men spending more time per day in a sitting posture.

Conclusions: This review suggests a weak association between time spent sitting during spare time and sperm concentration, but the findings are inconsistent, highlighting the need for further research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Andrology
Andrology ANDROLOGY-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Andrology is the study of the male reproductive system and other male gender related health issues. Andrology deals with basic and clinical aspects of the male reproductive system (gonads, endocrine and accessory organs) in all species, including the diagnosis and treatment of medical problems associated with sexual development, infertility, sexual dysfunction, sex hormone action and other urological problems. In medicine, Andrology as a specialty is a recent development, as it had previously been considered a subspecialty of urology or endocrinology
期刊最新文献
Human chorionic gonadotropin-based clinical treatments for infertile men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Motile cilia: Key developmental and functional roles in reproductive systems. Role of Kctd13 in modulating AR and SOX9 expression in different penile cell populations. Submicroscopic copy number variants in Indian children with gene panel negative 46, XY Gonadal Dysgenesis: An exploratory study using comparative genomic hybridization. Structural and evolutionary insights into the functioning of glycoprotein hormones and their receptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1