Barkha Chhabra, Dion Birhiray, Lorenzo Deveza, Matthew Gremillion, Grant McHorse, Benny Dahl, Frank Gerow, Darrell Hanson, Brian Smith
{"title":"由于多学科筛查过程导致的手术延迟会导致复杂脑瘫患者神经肌肉侧凸曲线进展吗?","authors":"Barkha Chhabra, Dion Birhiray, Lorenzo Deveza, Matthew Gremillion, Grant McHorse, Benny Dahl, Frank Gerow, Darrell Hanson, Brian Smith","doi":"10.1007/s00264-024-06378-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While surgical intervention of scoliosis in cerebral palsy (CP) patients has shown notable improvements in quality of life, the high risk of post-operative complications in CP patients necessitates careful preoperative optimization. A preoperative multidisciplinary (Multi-D) pathway at our tertiary pediatric hospital in effect since 2014 led to a significant reduction in mortality at one year. However, such a strategy delays surgery, potentially increasing the risk of curve progression. This study aims to elucidate the impact of the Multi-D screening process on curve progression in neuromuscular scoliosis among complex CP patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all CP patients with scoliosis at a tertiary care center from 2012 to 2020 was conducted. This assessment focused on the progression of the major Cobb angle from the time of the indications conference to surgery of patients who went through Multi-D screening. Patient demographics and perioperative variables were obtained from the electronic medical record (EPIC, Systems Verona, WI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After exclusion criteria were met, there were 85 patients who went through Multi-D, 78 of whom had surgery, and seven who did not. Surgery was delayed an average of 202 days for Multi-D optimization. We found a trend in increasing Cobb angle over time, but this correlation did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.079). 45 Multi-D surgery participants had a decrease or no change in Cobb angle and had surgery an average of 5.6 months after indications. 33 Multi-D surgery participants had an increase in Cobb angle and had surgery an average of 8.5 months after indications. Cobb angle progressed an average of 13.4° in the increased group, and - 0.4° in the decrease or no change group. There were no associations with change in Cobb angle and GMFCS, starting major curve angle, number of referrals, or intrathecal baclofen pump use according to this analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multi-D optimization resulted in an average delay in surgery of 6.7 months. Patients that did not have a change in Cobb angle had surgery within 5.6 months vs. patients that had an increase in Cobb angle had surgery on average 8.5 months after indicated for surgery, with an average increase of Cobb angle of 13.4°.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"447-453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does a delay of surgery due to a multidisciplinary screening process result in neuromuscular scoliosis curve progression in complex Cerebral Palsy?\",\"authors\":\"Barkha Chhabra, Dion Birhiray, Lorenzo Deveza, Matthew Gremillion, Grant McHorse, Benny Dahl, Frank Gerow, Darrell Hanson, Brian Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00264-024-06378-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While surgical intervention of scoliosis in cerebral palsy (CP) patients has shown notable improvements in quality of life, the high risk of post-operative complications in CP patients necessitates careful preoperative optimization. A preoperative multidisciplinary (Multi-D) pathway at our tertiary pediatric hospital in effect since 2014 led to a significant reduction in mortality at one year. However, such a strategy delays surgery, potentially increasing the risk of curve progression. This study aims to elucidate the impact of the Multi-D screening process on curve progression in neuromuscular scoliosis among complex CP patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all CP patients with scoliosis at a tertiary care center from 2012 to 2020 was conducted. This assessment focused on the progression of the major Cobb angle from the time of the indications conference to surgery of patients who went through Multi-D screening. Patient demographics and perioperative variables were obtained from the electronic medical record (EPIC, Systems Verona, WI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After exclusion criteria were met, there were 85 patients who went through Multi-D, 78 of whom had surgery, and seven who did not. Surgery was delayed an average of 202 days for Multi-D optimization. We found a trend in increasing Cobb angle over time, but this correlation did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.079). 45 Multi-D surgery participants had a decrease or no change in Cobb angle and had surgery an average of 5.6 months after indications. 33 Multi-D surgery participants had an increase in Cobb angle and had surgery an average of 8.5 months after indications. Cobb angle progressed an average of 13.4° in the increased group, and - 0.4° in the decrease or no change group. There were no associations with change in Cobb angle and GMFCS, starting major curve angle, number of referrals, or intrathecal baclofen pump use according to this analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multi-D optimization resulted in an average delay in surgery of 6.7 months. Patients that did not have a change in Cobb angle had surgery within 5.6 months vs. patients that had an increase in Cobb angle had surgery on average 8.5 months after indicated for surgery, with an average increase of Cobb angle of 13.4°.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"447-453\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06378-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06378-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:脑瘫(CP)患者脊柱侧凸的手术干预虽然显著改善了患者的生活质量,但CP患者术后并发症的风险较高,需要仔细的术前优化。我们的三级儿科医院自2014年起实施的术前多学科(Multi-D)途径显著降低了一年内的死亡率。然而,这样的策略会延迟手术,潜在地增加弯曲进展的风险。本研究旨在阐明多重d筛查过程对复杂CP患者神经肌肉侧凸弯曲进展的影响。方法:回顾性分析2012年至2020年在某三级医疗中心就诊的所有CP脊柱侧凸患者。本评估侧重于从适应症会议到手术的主要Cobb角的进展,这些患者进行了多维筛查。从电子病历(EPIC, Systems Verona, WI)中获得患者人口统计数据和围手术期变量。结果:符合排除标准后,85例患者行Multi-D,其中78例行手术,7例未行手术。由于多维优化,手术平均延迟202天。我们发现Cobb角随着时间的推移有增加的趋势,但这种相关性没有达到统计学意义(p = 0.079)。45例多角手术患者Cobb角减小或无变化,平均在适应证后5.6个月进行手术。33例多角手术患者Cobb角升高,术后平均8.5个月。增加组Cobb角平均增加13.4°,减少组或未改变组Cobb角平均增加- 0.4°。根据本分析,与Cobb角和GMFCS、起始主曲线角度、转诊次数或鞘内巴氯芬泵使用的变化无关。结论:多维优化平均延迟手术6.7个月。Cobb角没有变化的患者在手术后5.6个月内手术,而Cobb角增加的患者在手术后平均8.5个月手术,平均Cobb角增加13.4°。证据等级:III级,回顾性比较研究。
Does a delay of surgery due to a multidisciplinary screening process result in neuromuscular scoliosis curve progression in complex Cerebral Palsy?
Purpose: While surgical intervention of scoliosis in cerebral palsy (CP) patients has shown notable improvements in quality of life, the high risk of post-operative complications in CP patients necessitates careful preoperative optimization. A preoperative multidisciplinary (Multi-D) pathway at our tertiary pediatric hospital in effect since 2014 led to a significant reduction in mortality at one year. However, such a strategy delays surgery, potentially increasing the risk of curve progression. This study aims to elucidate the impact of the Multi-D screening process on curve progression in neuromuscular scoliosis among complex CP patients.
Methods: A retrospective review of all CP patients with scoliosis at a tertiary care center from 2012 to 2020 was conducted. This assessment focused on the progression of the major Cobb angle from the time of the indications conference to surgery of patients who went through Multi-D screening. Patient demographics and perioperative variables were obtained from the electronic medical record (EPIC, Systems Verona, WI).
Results: After exclusion criteria were met, there were 85 patients who went through Multi-D, 78 of whom had surgery, and seven who did not. Surgery was delayed an average of 202 days for Multi-D optimization. We found a trend in increasing Cobb angle over time, but this correlation did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.079). 45 Multi-D surgery participants had a decrease or no change in Cobb angle and had surgery an average of 5.6 months after indications. 33 Multi-D surgery participants had an increase in Cobb angle and had surgery an average of 8.5 months after indications. Cobb angle progressed an average of 13.4° in the increased group, and - 0.4° in the decrease or no change group. There were no associations with change in Cobb angle and GMFCS, starting major curve angle, number of referrals, or intrathecal baclofen pump use according to this analysis.
Conclusions: Multi-D optimization resulted in an average delay in surgery of 6.7 months. Patients that did not have a change in Cobb angle had surgery within 5.6 months vs. patients that had an increase in Cobb angle had surgery on average 8.5 months after indicated for surgery, with an average increase of Cobb angle of 13.4°.
Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
期刊介绍:
International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters.
Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable.
The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.