社区中未使用的症状响应工具包会发生什么:叙述回顾。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0105
Arielle R Brickman, Minsoo Yoon, Cecilia Li
{"title":"社区中未使用的症状响应工具包会发生什么:叙述回顾。","authors":"Arielle R Brickman, Minsoo Yoon, Cecilia Li","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> It is a common practice in Ontario to prescribe patients with advanced life-limiting illness a Symptom Response Kit (SRK), an emergency medication and medical supply kit, to manage distressing symptoms in the community toward the end of life (EOL). These are hugely beneficial to patients; however, the medications included have high risk profiles, and there is no uniform procedure in place for the return or disposal of SRKs. This narrative review aims to identify what happens to unused SRKs when no longer needed. <b><i>Methodology:</i></b> The literature search was conducted on Medline Ovid, Embase, and CINAHL databases in early 2022 and re-conducted from 2022 to September 15, 2023. Ontario Health at Home (OHAH) websites were also searched in early 2022 and again in January 2024. We included conference abstracts, systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and clinical trials published in the English language that discussed the use of SRK (or equivalent) in community palliative care. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-six studies were included, 12 (46.2%) of which originated from the United States and 3 (11.5%) from Canada. Few studies (34.6%) discussed safety. One study provided instructions given to patients and families regarding return or disposal of unused kits. There was no consistent terminology for SRKs in studies or throughout OHAH organization websites. Three OHAH organizations' websites had instructions available on procedures for disposal or return of unused kits. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> There is a paucity of research on the use of SRK, although the practice is common. There is no consensus on SRK terminology and no studies evaluating the return or safe disposal of SRKs in the community when no longer needed. Future work should establish safety regulations, disposal monitoring, supervision of use, and terminology standardization. OHAH organizations provincially are conducting innovative work in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"668-682"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Happens to Unused Symptom Response Kits in the Community: A Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Arielle R Brickman, Minsoo Yoon, Cecilia Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jpm.2024.0105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> It is a common practice in Ontario to prescribe patients with advanced life-limiting illness a Symptom Response Kit (SRK), an emergency medication and medical supply kit, to manage distressing symptoms in the community toward the end of life (EOL). These are hugely beneficial to patients; however, the medications included have high risk profiles, and there is no uniform procedure in place for the return or disposal of SRKs. This narrative review aims to identify what happens to unused SRKs when no longer needed. <b><i>Methodology:</i></b> The literature search was conducted on Medline Ovid, Embase, and CINAHL databases in early 2022 and re-conducted from 2022 to September 15, 2023. Ontario Health at Home (OHAH) websites were also searched in early 2022 and again in January 2024. We included conference abstracts, systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and clinical trials published in the English language that discussed the use of SRK (or equivalent) in community palliative care. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-six studies were included, 12 (46.2%) of which originated from the United States and 3 (11.5%) from Canada. Few studies (34.6%) discussed safety. One study provided instructions given to patients and families regarding return or disposal of unused kits. There was no consistent terminology for SRKs in studies or throughout OHAH organization websites. Three OHAH organizations' websites had instructions available on procedures for disposal or return of unused kits. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> There is a paucity of research on the use of SRK, although the practice is common. There is no consensus on SRK terminology and no studies evaluating the return or safe disposal of SRKs in the community when no longer needed. Future work should establish safety regulations, disposal monitoring, supervision of use, and terminology standardization. OHAH organizations provincially are conducting innovative work in this area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"668-682\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0105\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在安大略省,给晚期限制生命的疾病患者开一个症状反应包(SRK)是一种常见的做法,这是一种紧急药物和医疗供应包,用于管理社区临终前的痛苦症状(EOL)。这些对病人非常有益;然而,所包括的药物具有高风险,并且对于srk的退回或处置没有统一的程序。这篇叙述性回顾旨在确定当不再需要时未使用的srk会发生什么。方法:于2022年初在Medline Ovid、Embase和CINAHL数据库进行文献检索,并于2022年至2023年9月15日重新检索。安大略省家庭健康(OHAH)网站也在2022年初和2024年1月进行了搜索。我们纳入了会议摘要、系统综述、范围综述和用英语发表的讨论SRK(或同等药物)在社区姑息治疗中的应用的临床试验。结果:纳入26项研究,其中12项(46.2%)来自美国,3项(11.5%)来自加拿大。很少有研究(34.6%)讨论安全性。一项研究向患者和家属提供了关于归还或处置未使用的药箱的说明。在研究中或在OHAH组织网站上没有一致的srk术语。三个ohha组织的网站上有关于处置或归还未使用的工具包的程序说明。结论:尽管SRK的使用很常见,但关于SRK使用的研究却很缺乏。对SRK的术语没有达成共识,也没有研究评估不再需要SRK时在社区中的返回或安全处置。今后的工作应建立安全法规、处置监测、使用监督和术语标准化。各省的ohha组织正在这一领域开展创新工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Happens to Unused Symptom Response Kits in the Community: A Narrative Review.

Introduction: It is a common practice in Ontario to prescribe patients with advanced life-limiting illness a Symptom Response Kit (SRK), an emergency medication and medical supply kit, to manage distressing symptoms in the community toward the end of life (EOL). These are hugely beneficial to patients; however, the medications included have high risk profiles, and there is no uniform procedure in place for the return or disposal of SRKs. This narrative review aims to identify what happens to unused SRKs when no longer needed. Methodology: The literature search was conducted on Medline Ovid, Embase, and CINAHL databases in early 2022 and re-conducted from 2022 to September 15, 2023. Ontario Health at Home (OHAH) websites were also searched in early 2022 and again in January 2024. We included conference abstracts, systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and clinical trials published in the English language that discussed the use of SRK (or equivalent) in community palliative care. Results: Twenty-six studies were included, 12 (46.2%) of which originated from the United States and 3 (11.5%) from Canada. Few studies (34.6%) discussed safety. One study provided instructions given to patients and families regarding return or disposal of unused kits. There was no consistent terminology for SRKs in studies or throughout OHAH organization websites. Three OHAH organizations' websites had instructions available on procedures for disposal or return of unused kits. Conclusions: There is a paucity of research on the use of SRK, although the practice is common. There is no consensus on SRK terminology and no studies evaluating the return or safe disposal of SRKs in the community when no longer needed. Future work should establish safety regulations, disposal monitoring, supervision of use, and terminology standardization. OHAH organizations provincially are conducting innovative work in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
期刊最新文献
Help Is a Phone Call Away: A 24-Hour Nurse-Led Pediatric Hospice Clinical Care Line. The Role of Palliative Radiotherapy as Adjuvant Therapy for Pain Control in Pediatric Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Navigating Outpatient Opioid Prescribing. How Would Hospice Use Differ if Every Medicare Beneficiary Were in Medicare Advantage? Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Addressing Suicidality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1