{"title":"基于机器学习的光谱建模:增强美学的仿生指南。","authors":"L J Herrera, R Ghinea, M M Perez, R D Paravina","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide guidelines and means for optimal coverage and distribution of computer models with 1-10 clusters, designed based on an in vivo extensive dental colorimetric database and compare the findings with some reputable shade guides.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) algorithm was used to optimize the tab position in the CIELAB color space, while MATLAB Fuzzy Logic was used to implement the codes. A minimization process was performed to fine-tune the cluster centers, minimizing Coverage Error (CE<sub>00</sub>) and Maximum Error (ME<sub>00</sub>). Spectral reconstruction was performed, and the results were compared with the corresponding data for VITA classical A1-D4 (VC), Linearguide 3D-Master (LG), and Bleachedguide 3D-Master (BG) shade guide. Paired t-test was employed to assess the significance of CE<sub>00</sub> differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CE<sub>00</sub> and ME<sub>00</sub> ranges for 1-to-10-tab models were 3.8 (14.2) to 1.7 (4.3), while the corresponding values for shade guides were 3.1 (9.1) for VC, 2.3 (6.0) for LG, and 2.9 (9.3) for BG. Hence, the 4-tab-model with CE<sub>00</sub> of 2.2 and ME<sub>00</sub> of 7.1, outperformed CE<sub>00</sub> of LG (the lowest/best CE<sub>00</sub> among shade guides), while the 6-tab-model, with CE<sub>00</sub> of 2.0 and ME<sub>00</sub> of 5.6, outperformed its ME<sub>00</sub>. A paired t-test confirmed that increasing the number of tabs models resulted in significant CE improvement in all cases (p ≤ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shade guide models with only 4 to 6 tabs, optimized using computational techniques, outperformed physical dental shade guides tested, exhibiting significantly lower (better) Coverage Error and Maximum Error.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Given that the spectral modeling was performed on an extensive in vivo database of natural teeth, this approach was validated as a biomimetic guide for shade guides and corresponding materials of the future, offering a possibility for better shade matching with fewer shades/shade tabs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine-Learning-Based Spectral Modeling: A Biomimetic Guide for Enhancing Esthetics.\",\"authors\":\"L J Herrera, R Ghinea, M M Perez, R D Paravina\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.13380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide guidelines and means for optimal coverage and distribution of computer models with 1-10 clusters, designed based on an in vivo extensive dental colorimetric database and compare the findings with some reputable shade guides.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) algorithm was used to optimize the tab position in the CIELAB color space, while MATLAB Fuzzy Logic was used to implement the codes. A minimization process was performed to fine-tune the cluster centers, minimizing Coverage Error (CE<sub>00</sub>) and Maximum Error (ME<sub>00</sub>). Spectral reconstruction was performed, and the results were compared with the corresponding data for VITA classical A1-D4 (VC), Linearguide 3D-Master (LG), and Bleachedguide 3D-Master (BG) shade guide. Paired t-test was employed to assess the significance of CE<sub>00</sub> differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CE<sub>00</sub> and ME<sub>00</sub> ranges for 1-to-10-tab models were 3.8 (14.2) to 1.7 (4.3), while the corresponding values for shade guides were 3.1 (9.1) for VC, 2.3 (6.0) for LG, and 2.9 (9.3) for BG. Hence, the 4-tab-model with CE<sub>00</sub> of 2.2 and ME<sub>00</sub> of 7.1, outperformed CE<sub>00</sub> of LG (the lowest/best CE<sub>00</sub> among shade guides), while the 6-tab-model, with CE<sub>00</sub> of 2.0 and ME<sub>00</sub> of 5.6, outperformed its ME<sub>00</sub>. A paired t-test confirmed that increasing the number of tabs models resulted in significant CE improvement in all cases (p ≤ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shade guide models with only 4 to 6 tabs, optimized using computational techniques, outperformed physical dental shade guides tested, exhibiting significantly lower (better) Coverage Error and Maximum Error.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Given that the spectral modeling was performed on an extensive in vivo database of natural teeth, this approach was validated as a biomimetic guide for shade guides and corresponding materials of the future, offering a possibility for better shade matching with fewer shades/shade tabs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13380\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Machine-Learning-Based Spectral Modeling: A Biomimetic Guide for Enhancing Esthetics.
Objective: To provide guidelines and means for optimal coverage and distribution of computer models with 1-10 clusters, designed based on an in vivo extensive dental colorimetric database and compare the findings with some reputable shade guides.
Materials and methods: The Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) algorithm was used to optimize the tab position in the CIELAB color space, while MATLAB Fuzzy Logic was used to implement the codes. A minimization process was performed to fine-tune the cluster centers, minimizing Coverage Error (CE00) and Maximum Error (ME00). Spectral reconstruction was performed, and the results were compared with the corresponding data for VITA classical A1-D4 (VC), Linearguide 3D-Master (LG), and Bleachedguide 3D-Master (BG) shade guide. Paired t-test was employed to assess the significance of CE00 differences.
Results: CE00 and ME00 ranges for 1-to-10-tab models were 3.8 (14.2) to 1.7 (4.3), while the corresponding values for shade guides were 3.1 (9.1) for VC, 2.3 (6.0) for LG, and 2.9 (9.3) for BG. Hence, the 4-tab-model with CE00 of 2.2 and ME00 of 7.1, outperformed CE00 of LG (the lowest/best CE00 among shade guides), while the 6-tab-model, with CE00 of 2.0 and ME00 of 5.6, outperformed its ME00. A paired t-test confirmed that increasing the number of tabs models resulted in significant CE improvement in all cases (p ≤ 0.05).
Conclusions: Shade guide models with only 4 to 6 tabs, optimized using computational techniques, outperformed physical dental shade guides tested, exhibiting significantly lower (better) Coverage Error and Maximum Error.
Clinical significance: Given that the spectral modeling was performed on an extensive in vivo database of natural teeth, this approach was validated as a biomimetic guide for shade guides and corresponding materials of the future, offering a possibility for better shade matching with fewer shades/shade tabs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features.
The range of topics covered in the journal includes:
- Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts
- Implants
- Conservative adhesive restorations
- Tooth Whitening
- Prosthodontic materials and techniques
- Dental materials
- Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics
- Esthetics related research
- Innovations in esthetics