IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Reproductive biomedicine online Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104452
Celine Frank, Claire H C Laeven, Deidre Meulenbroeks, Edith Coonen, Christine E M de Die-Smulders, Ronald J T van Golde, Lonne M Mallens, Aimée D C Paulussen, Juliette Schuurmans, Liesbeth A D M van Osch
{"title":"Preconception carrier screening in couples seeking IVF: exploring the patient perspective.","authors":"Celine Frank, Claire H C Laeven, Deidre Meulenbroeks, Edith Coonen, Christine E M de Die-Smulders, Ronald J T van Golde, Lonne M Mallens, Aimée D C Paulussen, Juliette Schuurmans, Liesbeth A D M van Osch","doi":"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Research question: </strong>What is the level of understanding, and what are the attitudes and considerations regarding preconception carrier screening (PCS) among couples seeking IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)?</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A mixed-methods design was used. Nine interviews were conducted with couples or individual partners (n = 16) who had an initial consultation for IVF/ICSI in the 2 years preceding this study. A questionnaire was completed by 115 participants. No actual PCS was offered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All interviewed couples expressed a positive attitude towards PCS, and over half of the respondents stated that they would pursue or seriously consider pursuing PCS if possible. Some couples falsely believed that PCS could identify a cause for their fertility problems and increase their chance of conceiving. The desire to make an informed reproductive decision was the most important argument in favour of PCS. The primary argument against PCS was the apprehension of being confronted with reproductive dilemmas. The longer the delay to IVF/ICSI treatment required to perform PCS, the more couples would be inclined to decline screening. Participants indicated that they would prefer to receive information about PCS from a medical specialist at an early stage in their IVF/ICSI treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although attitudes towards PCS were generally positive, some concerns were raised about treatment delays and potential reproductive dilemmas, and some couples had misconceptions about the purpose of screening within the context of their IVF/ICSI treatment. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring information and counselling to the specific needs of couples seeking IVF/ICSI.</p>","PeriodicalId":21134,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biomedicine online","volume":"50 1","pages":"104452"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biomedicine online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104452","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究问题:寻求体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)的夫妇对受孕前携带者筛查(PCS)的了解程度、态度和考虑因素是什么?采用混合方法设计。对在本研究之前两年内接受过试管婴儿/卵胞浆内单精子显微注射初次咨询的夫妇或个人伴侣(n = 16)进行了九次访谈。115 名参与者填写了调查问卷。没有提供实际的 PCS:所有受访夫妇都对 PCS 持积极态度,半数以上的受访者表示,如果可能,他们会采取或认真考虑采取 PCS。一些夫妇错误地认为 PCS 可以找出导致其生育问题的原因,从而增加受孕机会。希望做出知情的生育决定是支持 PCS 的最重要理由。反对 PCS 的主要理由是担心面临生育困境。进行 PCS 所需的 IVF/ICSI 治疗延迟时间越长,越多的夫妇倾向于拒绝筛查。参与者表示,他们更希望在试管婴儿/卵胞浆内单精子显微注射治疗的早期阶段从医学专家那里获得有关 PCS 的信息:尽管人们对 PCS 的态度总体上是积极的,但也有一些人对治疗延误和潜在的生殖困境表示担忧,而且一些夫妇对在 IVF/ICSI 治疗过程中进行筛查的目的存在误解。这些发现凸显了根据寻求体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子显微注射的夫妇的具体需求提供信息和咨询的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preconception carrier screening in couples seeking IVF: exploring the patient perspective.

Research question: What is the level of understanding, and what are the attitudes and considerations regarding preconception carrier screening (PCS) among couples seeking IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)?

Design: A mixed-methods design was used. Nine interviews were conducted with couples or individual partners (n = 16) who had an initial consultation for IVF/ICSI in the 2 years preceding this study. A questionnaire was completed by 115 participants. No actual PCS was offered.

Results: All interviewed couples expressed a positive attitude towards PCS, and over half of the respondents stated that they would pursue or seriously consider pursuing PCS if possible. Some couples falsely believed that PCS could identify a cause for their fertility problems and increase their chance of conceiving. The desire to make an informed reproductive decision was the most important argument in favour of PCS. The primary argument against PCS was the apprehension of being confronted with reproductive dilemmas. The longer the delay to IVF/ICSI treatment required to perform PCS, the more couples would be inclined to decline screening. Participants indicated that they would prefer to receive information about PCS from a medical specialist at an early stage in their IVF/ICSI treatment.

Conclusion: Although attitudes towards PCS were generally positive, some concerns were raised about treatment delays and potential reproductive dilemmas, and some couples had misconceptions about the purpose of screening within the context of their IVF/ICSI treatment. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring information and counselling to the specific needs of couples seeking IVF/ICSI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive biomedicine online
Reproductive biomedicine online 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.50%
发文量
391
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Reproductive BioMedicine Online covers the formation, growth and differentiation of the human embryo. It is intended to bring to public attention new research on biological and clinical research on human reproduction and the human embryo including relevant studies on animals. It is published by a group of scientists and clinicians working in these fields of study. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, academics and patients. Context: The period of human embryonic growth covered is between the formation of the primordial germ cells in the fetus until mid-pregnancy. High quality research on lower animals is included if it helps to clarify the human situation. Studies progressing to birth and later are published if they have a direct bearing on events in the earlier stages of pregnancy.
期刊最新文献
Sir Robert Edwards: from the science of human conception to the reality of IVF birth. Ultra-fast vitrification and rapid elution of human oocytes: part I. germinal vesicle model validation. Ultra-fast vitrification and rapid elution of human oocytes: Part II - verification of blastocyst development from mature oocytes. Private versus funded infertility care: not a challenge but a call for cooperation Inside Front Cover - Affiliations and First page of TOC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1