珊瑚-关节-肩胛骨线:一种评估关节骨缺损的简单新工具。

K N Subramanian, Saseendar Shanmugasundaram, K S Jeash Narayan, M J Krishna Kumar, B Easwar, Dheepan Kumar, G Iyyapan, Aravind Ravichandran
{"title":"珊瑚-关节-肩胛骨线:一种评估关节骨缺损的简单新工具。","authors":"K N Subramanian, Saseendar Shanmugasundaram, K S Jeash Narayan, M J Krishna Kumar, B Easwar, Dheepan Kumar, G Iyyapan, Aravind Ravichandran","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment decisions for shoulder instability often necessitate surgical intervention, with glenoid bone loss being a key factor. Currently, various techniques exist to identify glenoid bone loss, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. This study introduces the Coraco-Gleno-Scapular (CGS) line as a tool for assessing critical glenoid bone defects. The objective is to define the CGS line and evaluate its utility in guiding clinical decisions regarding bone loss, proposing that defects extending posterior to this line indicate critical bone involvement requiring surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study analyzed 50 normal right shoulders from individuals aged 18-40 years. Using 3D en face views of the glenoid, the CGS line was defined from the anteroinferior base of the coracoid process, crossing the anterior glenoid, to the anteroinferior pole of the scapula. The best-fit circle area method and the glenoid index linear method were used to calculate the percentage of the bone area located anterior to the CGS line.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best fit circle area method revealed a mean glenoid surface area anterior to the CGS line of 22.19%, while the glenoid index linear method indicated a mean area of 27.2% anterior to the CGS line. Of the 50 shoulders, 14 had a glenoid surface area <20% anterior to the CGS line using the best-fit circle method, with no cases below 17.5%, while 36 individuals had a glenoid surface area >20%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Coraco-Gleno-Scapular line is a reliable and simple tool for assessing glenoid bone loss, providing valuable guidance in managing shoulder instability. Its ease of use makes it a promising candidate for standard application in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prospective observational study, Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"100374"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Coraco-Gleno-Scapular line: A simple tool for assessing glenoid bone defects.\",\"authors\":\"K N Subramanian, Saseendar Shanmugasundaram, K S Jeash Narayan, M J Krishna Kumar, B Easwar, Dheepan Kumar, G Iyyapan, Aravind Ravichandran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment decisions for shoulder instability often necessitate surgical intervention, with glenoid bone loss being a key factor. Currently, various techniques exist to identify glenoid bone loss, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. This study introduces the Coraco-Gleno-Scapular (CGS) line as a tool for assessing critical glenoid bone defects. The objective is to define the CGS line and evaluate its utility in guiding clinical decisions regarding bone loss, proposing that defects extending posterior to this line indicate critical bone involvement requiring surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study analyzed 50 normal right shoulders from individuals aged 18-40 years. Using 3D en face views of the glenoid, the CGS line was defined from the anteroinferior base of the coracoid process, crossing the anterior glenoid, to the anteroinferior pole of the scapula. The best-fit circle area method and the glenoid index linear method were used to calculate the percentage of the bone area located anterior to the CGS line.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best fit circle area method revealed a mean glenoid surface area anterior to the CGS line of 22.19%, while the glenoid index linear method indicated a mean area of 27.2% anterior to the CGS line. Of the 50 shoulders, 14 had a glenoid surface area <20% anterior to the CGS line using the best-fit circle method, with no cases below 17.5%, while 36 individuals had a glenoid surface area >20%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Coraco-Gleno-Scapular line is a reliable and simple tool for assessing glenoid bone loss, providing valuable guidance in managing shoulder instability. Its ease of use makes it a promising candidate for standard application in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prospective observational study, Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肩关节不稳的治疗决定往往需要手术干预,肩关节骨丢失是一个关键因素。目前,存在各种技术来识别关节盂骨丢失,每种技术都有自己的优点和缺点。本研究介绍了Coraco-Gleno-Scapular (CGS)线作为评估严重盂骨缺损的工具。目的是定义CGS线,并评估其在指导骨质流失临床决策中的作用,提出延伸到CGS线后方的缺损表明严重的骨受累需要手术干预。方法:对50例18 ~ 40岁的正常右肩进行分析。使用关节盂的三维正面视图,从喙突的前下基部,穿过前关节盂,到肩胛骨的前下极确定CGS线。采用最佳拟合圆面积法和关节盂指数线性法计算位于CGS线前的骨面积百分比。结果:最佳拟合圆面积法显示关节关节面平均面积为22.19%,而关节关节指数线性法显示关节关节面平均面积为27.2%。50个肩关节中,14个肩关节表面积为20%结论:coraco - gleno -肩胛线是评估肩胛骨丢失的可靠且简单的工具,为处理肩部不稳定提供了有价值的指导。它的易用性使其成为临床实践中标准应用的有希望的候选者。证据等级:前瞻性观察性研究,III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Coraco-Gleno-Scapular line: A simple tool for assessing glenoid bone defects.

Background: The treatment decisions for shoulder instability often necessitate surgical intervention, with glenoid bone loss being a key factor. Currently, various techniques exist to identify glenoid bone loss, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. This study introduces the Coraco-Gleno-Scapular (CGS) line as a tool for assessing critical glenoid bone defects. The objective is to define the CGS line and evaluate its utility in guiding clinical decisions regarding bone loss, proposing that defects extending posterior to this line indicate critical bone involvement requiring surgical intervention.

Methods: The study analyzed 50 normal right shoulders from individuals aged 18-40 years. Using 3D en face views of the glenoid, the CGS line was defined from the anteroinferior base of the coracoid process, crossing the anterior glenoid, to the anteroinferior pole of the scapula. The best-fit circle area method and the glenoid index linear method were used to calculate the percentage of the bone area located anterior to the CGS line.

Results: The best fit circle area method revealed a mean glenoid surface area anterior to the CGS line of 22.19%, while the glenoid index linear method indicated a mean area of 27.2% anterior to the CGS line. Of the 50 shoulders, 14 had a glenoid surface area <20% anterior to the CGS line using the best-fit circle method, with no cases below 17.5%, while 36 individuals had a glenoid surface area >20%.

Conclusion: The Coraco-Gleno-Scapular line is a reliable and simple tool for assessing glenoid bone loss, providing valuable guidance in managing shoulder instability. Its ease of use makes it a promising candidate for standard application in clinical practice.

Level of evidence: Prospective observational study, Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
期刊最新文献
RESPONSE TO ''LETTER TO EDITOR'. Mobile App-Based Monitoring of Recovery After Knee Osteotomy: Patients Take Approximately Five Months to Return to Preoperative Step Counts Despite Limited App Uptake. Return to Sport after First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis in Elite Athletes. Fixation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus Leads to Successful Clinical Outcomes in 9 out of 10 Patients: a Systematic Review. The Coraco-Gleno-Scapular Line and Assessing Glenoid Bone Defects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1