【CEA测量方法的差异导致CEA值的差异】。

Q4 Medicine Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-11-01
Hitoshi Kameyama, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Yuya Enoki, Gen Tomizawa
{"title":"【CEA测量方法的差异导致CEA值的差异】。","authors":"Hitoshi Kameyama, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Yuya Enoki, Gen Tomizawa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study evaluated changes in carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)values obtained using measurement methods.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>For this analysis, 163 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent new CEA measurements between January and March 2023 were included. Centaur XP or XPT was used as the assay device and ADVIA Centaur CEA was used as the reagent until December 2022(old assay method). The Alinity i system was used as the assay device and CEA-Abbott was used as the reagent after January 2023(new assay method).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients with recurrence and 2 patients with other cancers were excluded. The participants consisted of 76 men and 69 women with a median age of 74 years. The median interval between new and old CEA values was 91 days. The new CEA values were higher than the old CEA values in all but 1 case(99.3%). The mean CEA increased from 2.06 ng/mL to 3.14 ng/mL and was significantly higher when using the new assay method(p<0.0001). An approximate curve was plotted using the old CEA value as x and the new CEA value as y, yielding the following equation: y=1.3281x+0.4112(R2=0.8334).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that CEA levels differ depending on the measurement method used.</p>","PeriodicalId":35588,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","volume":"51 11","pages":"1139-1142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Variation in CEA Values because of Differences in CEA Measurement Methods].\",\"authors\":\"Hitoshi Kameyama, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Yuya Enoki, Gen Tomizawa\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study evaluated changes in carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)values obtained using measurement methods.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>For this analysis, 163 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent new CEA measurements between January and March 2023 were included. Centaur XP or XPT was used as the assay device and ADVIA Centaur CEA was used as the reagent until December 2022(old assay method). The Alinity i system was used as the assay device and CEA-Abbott was used as the reagent after January 2023(new assay method).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients with recurrence and 2 patients with other cancers were excluded. The participants consisted of 76 men and 69 women with a median age of 74 years. The median interval between new and old CEA values was 91 days. The new CEA values were higher than the old CEA values in all but 1 case(99.3%). The mean CEA increased from 2.06 ng/mL to 3.14 ng/mL and was significantly higher when using the new assay method(p<0.0001). An approximate curve was plotted using the old CEA value as x and the new CEA value as y, yielding the following equation: y=1.3281x+0.4112(R2=0.8334).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that CEA levels differ depending on the measurement method used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\"51 11\",\"pages\":\"1139-1142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价癌胚抗原(CEA)测定方法的变化。患者和方法:在这项分析中,163名结直肠癌患者在2023年1月至3月期间接受了新的CEA测量。使用Centaur XP或XPT作为检测设备,使用ADVIA Centaur CEA作为试剂,直到2022年12月(旧检测方法)。2023年1月(新检测方法)后使用Alinity i系统作为检测设备,CEA-Abbott作为试剂。结果:排除16例复发患者和2例其他肿瘤患者。参与者包括76名男性和69名女性,平均年龄为74岁。新旧CEA值的中位间隔为91天。除1例(99.3%)外,新CEA值均高于旧CEA值。CEA的平均值从2.06 ng/mL增加到3.14 ng/mL,并且在使用新方法时明显更高(结论:本研究表明CEA水平因使用的测量方法而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Variation in CEA Values because of Differences in CEA Measurement Methods].

Aim: This study evaluated changes in carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)values obtained using measurement methods.

Patients and methods: For this analysis, 163 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent new CEA measurements between January and March 2023 were included. Centaur XP or XPT was used as the assay device and ADVIA Centaur CEA was used as the reagent until December 2022(old assay method). The Alinity i system was used as the assay device and CEA-Abbott was used as the reagent after January 2023(new assay method).

Results: Sixteen patients with recurrence and 2 patients with other cancers were excluded. The participants consisted of 76 men and 69 women with a median age of 74 years. The median interval between new and old CEA values was 91 days. The new CEA values were higher than the old CEA values in all but 1 case(99.3%). The mean CEA increased from 2.06 ng/mL to 3.14 ng/mL and was significantly higher when using the new assay method(p<0.0001). An approximate curve was plotted using the old CEA value as x and the new CEA value as y, yielding the following equation: y=1.3281x+0.4112(R2=0.8334).

Conclusion: This study showed that CEA levels differ depending on the measurement method used.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
337
期刊最新文献
[Online Survey about Communication between Abemaciclib-Treated Patients with Breast Cancer and Physicians]. [Survey on the Size of Oral Anticancer Drugs]. [Ⅰ. Personalized Perioperative Therapy in Luminal Breast Cancer]. [Ⅱ. Recurrence Score in Patients with BRCA1/2 Mutation from the OlympiA and TAILORx Trial Results]. [Ⅲ. MONARCH-E and Oncotype DX].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1