Clara Constantinescu, Doerthe Ziegelitz, Carsten Wikkelsø, Silke Kern, Daniel Jaraj, Lina Rydén, Eric Westman, Ingmar Skoog, Mats Tullberg
{"title":"在一项包含 791 名参与者的人群研究中,特发性正常压力脑积水的 MRI 标记:探索参考值和关联。","authors":"Clara Constantinescu, Doerthe Ziegelitz, Carsten Wikkelsø, Silke Kern, Daniel Jaraj, Lina Rydén, Eric Westman, Ingmar Skoog, Mats Tullberg","doi":"10.1177/19714009241303132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Epidemiological studies on idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) imaging markers and their normal values are scarce. This population-based study aimed to analyze several morphologic and volumetric iNPH-related imaging markers in a large sample, determining their distribution, diagnostic accuracy, suggested cut-offs, and associations with iNPH symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 791 70 year olds, 40 with radiologically probable iNPH (iNPH<sub>Radiol</sub>) and 751 without iNPH features (reference). MRI measures included Evans index (EI), z-EI, brain per ventricle ratio at anterior (BVR<sub>AC</sub>) and posterior commissures (BVR<sub>PC</sub>), sulcal compression, Sylvian fissure enlargement, callosal angle, diameter of temporal horns, 3<sup>rd</sup> and 4<sup>th</sup> ventricles, midbrain, and pons. Volumes of ventricles, corpus callosum, and brainstem were computed using automated segmentation. ROC analysis determined imaging markers' cut-offs. Symptoms were evaluated clinically and through self-report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the reference group, median values (95% CI) for imaging markers were as follows: EI: 0.27 (0.26-0.27), z-EI: 0.28 (0.26-0.31), BVR<sub>AC</sub>: 1.69 (1.48-1.90), and BVR<sub>PC</sub>: 2.66 (2.24-3.27). Most imaging markers differed significantly between iNPH<sub>Radiol</sub> and the reference. Lateral ventricle volumes correlated better with z-EI and BVR than EI (Rs > 0.81 vs 0.68). Optimal cut-off values for z-EI, and BVR<sub>AC</sub> and BVR<sub>PC</sub> for distinguishing iNPH<sub>Radiol</sub> were 0.32, 1.36, and 1.83, respectively. Clinical symptoms correlated moderately with imaging markers (Rs < 0.49 for iNPH<sub>Radiol</sub>, <i>p</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We report population-based reference values and propose cut-offs for iNPH-related imaging markers and volumetric measurements. Z-EI and BVR are likely superior markers for assessing ventricular enlargement in iNPH. Imaging markers of iNPH correlate moderately with iNPH symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009241303132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI markers of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in a population study with 791 participants: Exploring reference values and associations.\",\"authors\":\"Clara Constantinescu, Doerthe Ziegelitz, Carsten Wikkelsø, Silke Kern, Daniel Jaraj, Lina Rydén, Eric Westman, Ingmar Skoog, Mats Tullberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19714009241303132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Epidemiological studies on idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) imaging markers and their normal values are scarce. This population-based study aimed to analyze several morphologic and volumetric iNPH-related imaging markers in a large sample, determining their distribution, diagnostic accuracy, suggested cut-offs, and associations with iNPH symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 791 70 year olds, 40 with radiologically probable iNPH (iNPH<sub>Radiol</sub>) and 751 without iNPH features (reference). MRI measures included Evans index (EI), z-EI, brain per ventricle ratio at anterior (BVR<sub>AC</sub>) and posterior commissures (BVR<sub>PC</sub>), sulcal compression, Sylvian fissure enlargement, callosal angle, diameter of temporal horns, 3<sup>rd</sup> and 4<sup>th</sup> ventricles, midbrain, and pons. Volumes of ventricles, corpus callosum, and brainstem were computed using automated segmentation. ROC analysis determined imaging markers' cut-offs. Symptoms were evaluated clinically and through self-report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the reference group, median values (95% CI) for imaging markers were as follows: EI: 0.27 (0.26-0.27), z-EI: 0.28 (0.26-0.31), BVR<sub>AC</sub>: 1.69 (1.48-1.90), and BVR<sub>PC</sub>: 2.66 (2.24-3.27). Most imaging markers differed significantly between iNPH<sub>Radiol</sub> and the reference. Lateral ventricle volumes correlated better with z-EI and BVR than EI (Rs > 0.81 vs 0.68). Optimal cut-off values for z-EI, and BVR<sub>AC</sub> and BVR<sub>PC</sub> for distinguishing iNPH<sub>Radiol</sub> were 0.32, 1.36, and 1.83, respectively. Clinical symptoms correlated moderately with imaging markers (Rs < 0.49 for iNPH<sub>Radiol</sub>, <i>p</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We report population-based reference values and propose cut-offs for iNPH-related imaging markers and volumetric measurements. Z-EI and BVR are likely superior markers for assessing ventricular enlargement in iNPH. Imaging markers of iNPH correlate moderately with iNPH symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19714009241303132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626555/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241303132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241303132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
MRI markers of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in a population study with 791 participants: Exploring reference values and associations.
Purpose: Epidemiological studies on idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) imaging markers and their normal values are scarce. This population-based study aimed to analyze several morphologic and volumetric iNPH-related imaging markers in a large sample, determining their distribution, diagnostic accuracy, suggested cut-offs, and associations with iNPH symptoms.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 791 70 year olds, 40 with radiologically probable iNPH (iNPHRadiol) and 751 without iNPH features (reference). MRI measures included Evans index (EI), z-EI, brain per ventricle ratio at anterior (BVRAC) and posterior commissures (BVRPC), sulcal compression, Sylvian fissure enlargement, callosal angle, diameter of temporal horns, 3rd and 4th ventricles, midbrain, and pons. Volumes of ventricles, corpus callosum, and brainstem were computed using automated segmentation. ROC analysis determined imaging markers' cut-offs. Symptoms were evaluated clinically and through self-report.
Results: In the reference group, median values (95% CI) for imaging markers were as follows: EI: 0.27 (0.26-0.27), z-EI: 0.28 (0.26-0.31), BVRAC: 1.69 (1.48-1.90), and BVRPC: 2.66 (2.24-3.27). Most imaging markers differed significantly between iNPHRadiol and the reference. Lateral ventricle volumes correlated better with z-EI and BVR than EI (Rs > 0.81 vs 0.68). Optimal cut-off values for z-EI, and BVRAC and BVRPC for distinguishing iNPHRadiol were 0.32, 1.36, and 1.83, respectively. Clinical symptoms correlated moderately with imaging markers (Rs < 0.49 for iNPHRadiol, p < .01).
Conclusions: We report population-based reference values and propose cut-offs for iNPH-related imaging markers and volumetric measurements. Z-EI and BVR are likely superior markers for assessing ventricular enlargement in iNPH. Imaging markers of iNPH correlate moderately with iNPH symptoms.
期刊介绍:
NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.