父亲参与产前准备对夫妻早产准备的影响。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Patient Education and Counseling Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108599
Mir A Basir, Siobhan M McDonnell, Ruta Brazauskas, U Olivia Kim, S Iqbal Ahamed, Jennifer J McIntosh, Kris Pizur-Barnekow, Michael B Pitt, Abbey Kruper, Steven R Leuthner, Kathryn E Flynn
{"title":"父亲参与产前准备对夫妻早产准备的影响。","authors":"Mir A Basir, Siobhan M McDonnell, Ruta Brazauskas, U Olivia Kim, S Iqbal Ahamed, Jennifer J McIntosh, Kris Pizur-Barnekow, Michael B Pitt, Abbey Kruper, Steven R Leuthner, Kathryn E Flynn","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the effect of fathers' participation in the Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) program on maternal learning and fathers' preterm birth knowledge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mothers with preterm birth predisposing medical condition(s) enrolled with or without the baby's father and were randomized to the P3 intervention (text-messages linking to animated videos) or control (patient education webpages). Parent Prematurity Knowledge Questionnaire assessed knowledge, including unmarried fathers' legal neonatal decision-making ability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>104 mothers reported living with the baby's father; 50 participated with the father and 54 participated alone. In the P3 group, mothers participating with the father (n = 33) had greater knowledge than mothers participating alone (n = 21), 85 % correct responses vs. 76 %, p = 0.033. However, there was no difference in knowledge among the control mothers, 67 % vs. 60 %, p = 0.068. P3 fathers (n = 33) knowledge scores were not different than control fathers (n = 17), 77 % vs. 68 %, p= 0.054. Parents who viewed the video on fathers' rights (n = 58) were more likely than those who did not (n = 96) to know unmarried fathers' legal inability to decide neonatal treatments, 84 % vs. 41 %, p < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among opposite-sex cohabitating couples, fathers' participation in the P3 program enhanced maternal learning.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>The P3 program's potential to educate fathers may benefit high-risk pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04093492, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04093492.</p>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"132 ","pages":"108599"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of fathers in Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) program on couple's preterm birth preparedness.\",\"authors\":\"Mir A Basir, Siobhan M McDonnell, Ruta Brazauskas, U Olivia Kim, S Iqbal Ahamed, Jennifer J McIntosh, Kris Pizur-Barnekow, Michael B Pitt, Abbey Kruper, Steven R Leuthner, Kathryn E Flynn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pec.2024.108599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the effect of fathers' participation in the Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) program on maternal learning and fathers' preterm birth knowledge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mothers with preterm birth predisposing medical condition(s) enrolled with or without the baby's father and were randomized to the P3 intervention (text-messages linking to animated videos) or control (patient education webpages). Parent Prematurity Knowledge Questionnaire assessed knowledge, including unmarried fathers' legal neonatal decision-making ability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>104 mothers reported living with the baby's father; 50 participated with the father and 54 participated alone. In the P3 group, mothers participating with the father (n = 33) had greater knowledge than mothers participating alone (n = 21), 85 % correct responses vs. 76 %, p = 0.033. However, there was no difference in knowledge among the control mothers, 67 % vs. 60 %, p = 0.068. P3 fathers (n = 33) knowledge scores were not different than control fathers (n = 17), 77 % vs. 68 %, p= 0.054. Parents who viewed the video on fathers' rights (n = 58) were more likely than those who did not (n = 96) to know unmarried fathers' legal inability to decide neonatal treatments, 84 % vs. 41 %, p < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among opposite-sex cohabitating couples, fathers' participation in the P3 program enhanced maternal learning.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>The P3 program's potential to educate fathers may benefit high-risk pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04093492, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04093492.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"volume\":\"132 \",\"pages\":\"108599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Education and Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108599\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价父亲参与产前准备(Preemie Prep for Parents, P3)项目对母亲学习和父亲早产知识的影响。方法:有早产易感疾病的母亲与婴儿父亲一起或不一起入组,随机分为P3干预组(与动画视频链接的短信)和对照组(患者教育网页)。父母早产儿知识问卷评估知识,包括未婚父亲对新生儿的合法决策能力。结果:104名母亲报告与婴儿父亲生活在一起;50人与父亲一起参加,54人单独参加。在P3组中,与父亲一起参与的母亲(n = 33)比单独参与的母亲(n = 21)有更多的知识,正确率为85%比76%,p = 0.033。然而,对照组母亲在知识方面没有差异,67%对60%,p = 0.068。P3组父亲(n = 33)的知识得分与对照组父亲(n = 17)无显著差异,分别为77%对68%,p= 0.054。看过父亲权利视频的父母(n = 58)比没有看过的父母(n = 96)更有可能知道未婚父亲在决定新生儿治疗方面的法律无能,比例为84%比41%。结论:在异性同居夫妇中,父亲参与P3项目促进了母亲的学习。实践启示:P3项目教育父亲的潜力可能有利于高危妊娠。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04093492, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04093492。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of fathers in Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) program on couple's preterm birth preparedness.

Objective: Evaluate the effect of fathers' participation in the Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) program on maternal learning and fathers' preterm birth knowledge.

Methods: Mothers with preterm birth predisposing medical condition(s) enrolled with or without the baby's father and were randomized to the P3 intervention (text-messages linking to animated videos) or control (patient education webpages). Parent Prematurity Knowledge Questionnaire assessed knowledge, including unmarried fathers' legal neonatal decision-making ability.

Results: 104 mothers reported living with the baby's father; 50 participated with the father and 54 participated alone. In the P3 group, mothers participating with the father (n = 33) had greater knowledge than mothers participating alone (n = 21), 85 % correct responses vs. 76 %, p = 0.033. However, there was no difference in knowledge among the control mothers, 67 % vs. 60 %, p = 0.068. P3 fathers (n = 33) knowledge scores were not different than control fathers (n = 17), 77 % vs. 68 %, p= 0.054. Parents who viewed the video on fathers' rights (n = 58) were more likely than those who did not (n = 96) to know unmarried fathers' legal inability to decide neonatal treatments, 84 % vs. 41 %, p < 0.001.

Conclusions: Among opposite-sex cohabitating couples, fathers' participation in the P3 program enhanced maternal learning.

Practice implications: The P3 program's potential to educate fathers may benefit high-risk pregnancies.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04093492, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04093492.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Education and Counseling
Patient Education and Counseling 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
期刊最新文献
Embedding an illustrator in the process of co-producing resources to enhance communication and shared decision-making for patients prescribed high-risk medication. Effect of fathers in Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) program on couple's preterm birth preparedness. Nonverbal behavior in telehealth visits: A narrative review. Effective remediation for advanced practice providers with lowest patient experience: The power of relational resources. Relative importance of "why" and "how" messages on medication behavior: Insights from construal level theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1