Dilki Jayasinghe, Nathasha Naranpanawa, Daniel Paul Ashley, Åsa Ingvar, Brigid Betz-Stablein, H Peter Soyer, Monika Janda
{"title":"当代普通人群研究中痣计数和报告方法的系统性回顾。","authors":"Dilki Jayasinghe, Nathasha Naranpanawa, Daniel Paul Ashley, Åsa Ingvar, Brigid Betz-Stablein, H Peter Soyer, Monika Janda","doi":"10.5826/dpc.1404a223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Having many melanocytic nevi on the skin is a risk factor for melanoma. However, the reproducibility of nevus counts in previous studies is limited due to high inter- and intraobserver variation. Despite the introduction of a protocol for counting and reporting of nevi in 1990 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), significant variations in nevus counting methods persist across studies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to review the variations in nevus counting and reporting methods, adherence and deviations from the IARC protocol, and the reproducibility of nevus counting studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science was conducted. The review was limited to nevus (>2 mm) counting studies of general population adults conducted between 2000 and 2022 and studies using skilled examiners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the eight studies which were eligible for inclusion, none followed the IARC protocol. Three studies used a predefined criterion to count nevi. Five studies provided training for their observers. Three studies assessed the inter- or intraobserver variation using the correlation coefficient (>0.75), and three studies attempted to verify the validity and the reproducibility of the counts. There was little to no agreement in nevus counting and reporting procedures in the reviewed studies, and most studies did not report their procedures adequately.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the need for an easily accessible and feasible protocol for the identification, counting, and reporting of nevi, which also considers nevus counting from total-body imaging and automated nevus counts since these technologies are expected to become widely available for future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11168,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review of Nevus Counting and Reporting Methodologies in Contemporary Studies of the General Population.\",\"authors\":\"Dilki Jayasinghe, Nathasha Naranpanawa, Daniel Paul Ashley, Åsa Ingvar, Brigid Betz-Stablein, H Peter Soyer, Monika Janda\",\"doi\":\"10.5826/dpc.1404a223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Having many melanocytic nevi on the skin is a risk factor for melanoma. However, the reproducibility of nevus counts in previous studies is limited due to high inter- and intraobserver variation. Despite the introduction of a protocol for counting and reporting of nevi in 1990 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), significant variations in nevus counting methods persist across studies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to review the variations in nevus counting and reporting methods, adherence and deviations from the IARC protocol, and the reproducibility of nevus counting studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science was conducted. The review was limited to nevus (>2 mm) counting studies of general population adults conducted between 2000 and 2022 and studies using skilled examiners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the eight studies which were eligible for inclusion, none followed the IARC protocol. Three studies used a predefined criterion to count nevi. Five studies provided training for their observers. Three studies assessed the inter- or intraobserver variation using the correlation coefficient (>0.75), and three studies attempted to verify the validity and the reproducibility of the counts. There was little to no agreement in nevus counting and reporting procedures in the reviewed studies, and most studies did not report their procedures adequately.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the need for an easily accessible and feasible protocol for the identification, counting, and reporting of nevi, which also considers nevus counting from total-body imaging and automated nevus counts since these technologies are expected to become widely available for future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology practical & conceptual\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619936/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology practical & conceptual\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1404a223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1404a223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
皮肤上有许多黑素细胞痣是黑色素瘤的危险因素。然而,在以往的研究中,由于观察者之间和内部的高度变异,痣计数的可重复性受到限制。尽管国际癌症研究机构(IARC)在1990年引入了痣计数和报告的协议,但在不同的研究中,痣计数方法仍然存在显著差异。目的:我们试图回顾痣计数和报告方法的变化,遵守和偏离IARC协议,以及痣计数研究的可重复性。方法:系统检索Embase、PubMed、Web of Science。该综述仅限于2000年至2022年期间进行的普通人群成年人的痣(bbb20 mm)计数研究以及使用熟练检查员的研究。结果:在符合纳入条件的8项研究中,没有一项遵循IARC的方案。三项研究使用了预定义的标准来计算痣。五项研究为观察员提供了培训。三项研究使用相关系数(>0.75)评估了观察者间或观察者内的变异,三项研究试图验证计数的有效性和可重复性。在回顾的研究中,对痣计数和报告程序几乎没有一致意见,而且大多数研究没有充分报告其程序。结论:本综述强调需要一个易于获取和可行的方案来识别、计数和报告痣,其中还考虑了全身成像和自动痣计数,因为这些技术有望在未来的研究中得到广泛应用。
Systematic Review of Nevus Counting and Reporting Methodologies in Contemporary Studies of the General Population.
Introduction: Having many melanocytic nevi on the skin is a risk factor for melanoma. However, the reproducibility of nevus counts in previous studies is limited due to high inter- and intraobserver variation. Despite the introduction of a protocol for counting and reporting of nevi in 1990 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), significant variations in nevus counting methods persist across studies.
Objectives: We sought to review the variations in nevus counting and reporting methods, adherence and deviations from the IARC protocol, and the reproducibility of nevus counting studies.
Methods: A systematic search of Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science was conducted. The review was limited to nevus (>2 mm) counting studies of general population adults conducted between 2000 and 2022 and studies using skilled examiners.
Results: Out of the eight studies which were eligible for inclusion, none followed the IARC protocol. Three studies used a predefined criterion to count nevi. Five studies provided training for their observers. Three studies assessed the inter- or intraobserver variation using the correlation coefficient (>0.75), and three studies attempted to verify the validity and the reproducibility of the counts. There was little to no agreement in nevus counting and reporting procedures in the reviewed studies, and most studies did not report their procedures adequately.
Conclusion: This review highlights the need for an easily accessible and feasible protocol for the identification, counting, and reporting of nevi, which also considers nevus counting from total-body imaging and automated nevus counts since these technologies are expected to become widely available for future studies.