发展个体化风险评估模型预测创伤后癫痫后1和2年中度至重度创伤性脑损伤:创伤性脑损伤模型系统研究。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1111/epi.18210
Nabil Awan, Raj G. Kumar, Shannon B. Juengst, Dominic DiSanto, Cynthia Harrison-Felix, Kristen Dams-O'Connor, Mary Jo Pugh, Ross D. Zafonte, William C. Walker, Jerzy P. Szaflarski, Robert T. Krafty, Amy K. Wagner
{"title":"发展个体化风险评估模型预测创伤后癫痫后1和2年中度至重度创伤性脑损伤:创伤性脑损伤模型系统研究。","authors":"Nabil Awan,&nbsp;Raj G. Kumar,&nbsp;Shannon B. Juengst,&nbsp;Dominic DiSanto,&nbsp;Cynthia Harrison-Felix,&nbsp;Kristen Dams-O'Connor,&nbsp;Mary Jo Pugh,&nbsp;Ross D. Zafonte,&nbsp;William C. Walker,&nbsp;Jerzy P. Szaflarski,&nbsp;Robert T. Krafty,&nbsp;Amy K. Wagner","doi":"10.1111/epi.18210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Although traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) are common, there are no prospective models quantifying individual epilepsy risk after moderate-to-severe TBI (msTBI). We generated parsimonious prediction models to quantify individual epilepsy risk between acute inpatient rehabilitation for individuals 2 years after msTBI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used data from 6089 prospectively enrolled participants (≥16 years) in the TBI Model Systems National Database. Of these, 4126 individuals had complete seizure data collected over a 2-year period post-injury. We performed a case-complete analysis to generate multiple prediction models using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression. Baseline predictors were used to assess 2-year seizure risk (Model 1). Then a 2-year seizure risk was assessed excluding the acute care variables (Model 2). In addition, we generated prognostic models predicting new/recurrent seizures during Year 2 post-msTBI (Model 3) and predicting new seizures only during Year 2 (Model 4). We assessed model sensitivity when keeping specificity ≥.60, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and AUROC model performance through 5-fold cross-validation (CV).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Model 1 (73.8% men, 44.1 ± 19.7 years, 76.1% moderate TBI) had a model sensitivity = 76.00% and average AUROC = .73 ± .02 in 5-fold CV. Model 2 had a model sensitivity = 72.16% and average AUROC = .70 ± .02 in 5-fold CV. Model 3 had a sensitivity = 86.63% and average AUROC = .84 ± .03 in 5-fold CV. Model 4 had a sensitivity = 73.68% and average AUROC = .67 ± .03 in 5-fold CV. Cranial surgeries, acute care seizures, intracranial fragments, and traumatic hemorrhages were consistent predictors across all models. Demographic and mental health variables contributed to some models. Simulated, clinical examples model individual PTE predictions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>Using information available, acute-care, and year-1 post-injury data, parsimonious quantitative epilepsy prediction models following msTBI may facilitate timely evidence-based PTE prognostication within a 2-year period. We developed interactive web-based tools for testing prediction model external validity among independent cohorts. Individualized PTE risk may inform clinical trial development/design and clinical decision support tools for this population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"66 2","pages":"482-498"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epi.18210","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of individualized risk assessment models for predicting post-traumatic epilepsy 1 and 2 years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: A traumatic brain injury model system study\",\"authors\":\"Nabil Awan,&nbsp;Raj G. Kumar,&nbsp;Shannon B. Juengst,&nbsp;Dominic DiSanto,&nbsp;Cynthia Harrison-Felix,&nbsp;Kristen Dams-O'Connor,&nbsp;Mary Jo Pugh,&nbsp;Ross D. Zafonte,&nbsp;William C. Walker,&nbsp;Jerzy P. Szaflarski,&nbsp;Robert T. Krafty,&nbsp;Amy K. Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) are common, there are no prospective models quantifying individual epilepsy risk after moderate-to-severe TBI (msTBI). We generated parsimonious prediction models to quantify individual epilepsy risk between acute inpatient rehabilitation for individuals 2 years after msTBI.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used data from 6089 prospectively enrolled participants (≥16 years) in the TBI Model Systems National Database. Of these, 4126 individuals had complete seizure data collected over a 2-year period post-injury. We performed a case-complete analysis to generate multiple prediction models using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression. Baseline predictors were used to assess 2-year seizure risk (Model 1). Then a 2-year seizure risk was assessed excluding the acute care variables (Model 2). In addition, we generated prognostic models predicting new/recurrent seizures during Year 2 post-msTBI (Model 3) and predicting new seizures only during Year 2 (Model 4). We assessed model sensitivity when keeping specificity ≥.60, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and AUROC model performance through 5-fold cross-validation (CV).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Model 1 (73.8% men, 44.1 ± 19.7 years, 76.1% moderate TBI) had a model sensitivity = 76.00% and average AUROC = .73 ± .02 in 5-fold CV. Model 2 had a model sensitivity = 72.16% and average AUROC = .70 ± .02 in 5-fold CV. Model 3 had a sensitivity = 86.63% and average AUROC = .84 ± .03 in 5-fold CV. Model 4 had a sensitivity = 73.68% and average AUROC = .67 ± .03 in 5-fold CV. Cranial surgeries, acute care seizures, intracranial fragments, and traumatic hemorrhages were consistent predictors across all models. Demographic and mental health variables contributed to some models. Simulated, clinical examples model individual PTE predictions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using information available, acute-care, and year-1 post-injury data, parsimonious quantitative epilepsy prediction models following msTBI may facilitate timely evidence-based PTE prognostication within a 2-year period. We developed interactive web-based tools for testing prediction model external validity among independent cohorts. Individualized PTE risk may inform clinical trial development/design and clinical decision support tools for this population.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\"66 2\",\"pages\":\"482-498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epi.18210\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.18210\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.18210","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管创伤性脑损伤(TBI)和创伤后癫痫(PTE)很常见,但目前还没有量化中重度TBI (msTBI)后个体癫痫风险的前瞻性模型。我们建立了简洁的预测模型来量化msTBI后2年急性住院康复患者之间的个体癫痫风险。方法:我们使用TBI模型系统国家数据库中6089名前瞻性入组参与者(≥16岁)的数据。其中,4126人在受伤后2年内收集了完整的癫痫发作数据。我们使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子逻辑回归进行了案例完整分析,以生成多个预测模型。使用基线预测因子评估2年癫痫发作风险(模型1)。然后评估排除急性护理变量的2年癫痫发作风险(模型2)。此外,我们建立了预测mstbi后第2年新发作/复发发作的预后模型(模型3),并仅预测第2年新发作(模型4)。我们在保持特异性≥时评估模型敏感性。60、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC),并通过5倍交叉验证(CV)验证AUROC模型的性能。结果:模型1(73.8%男性,44.1±19.7岁,76.1%中度TBI)的模型敏感性= 76.00%,平均AUROC = 0.73±。5倍CV中的02。模型2的模型灵敏度为72.16%,平均AUROC为0.70±。5倍CV中的02。模型3的灵敏度为86.63%,平均AUROC为0.84±。5倍CV中的03。模型4的灵敏度为73.68%,平均AUROC为0.67±。5倍CV中的03。颅内手术、急性发作、颅内碎片和创伤性出血是所有模型一致的预测因子。人口和心理健康变量对某些模型有影响。模拟的,临床的例子模拟个人PTE预测。意义:利用现有信息、急性护理和损伤后1年的数据,简化msTBI后癫痫定量预测模型可以促进2年内及时的基于证据的PTE预测。我们开发了交互式的基于网络的工具,用于在独立队列中测试预测模型的外部有效性。个体化PTE风险可以为该人群的临床试验开发/设计和临床决策支持工具提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of individualized risk assessment models for predicting post-traumatic epilepsy 1 and 2 years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: A traumatic brain injury model system study

Objective

Although traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) are common, there are no prospective models quantifying individual epilepsy risk after moderate-to-severe TBI (msTBI). We generated parsimonious prediction models to quantify individual epilepsy risk between acute inpatient rehabilitation for individuals 2 years after msTBI.

Methods

We used data from 6089 prospectively enrolled participants (≥16 years) in the TBI Model Systems National Database. Of these, 4126 individuals had complete seizure data collected over a 2-year period post-injury. We performed a case-complete analysis to generate multiple prediction models using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression. Baseline predictors were used to assess 2-year seizure risk (Model 1). Then a 2-year seizure risk was assessed excluding the acute care variables (Model 2). In addition, we generated prognostic models predicting new/recurrent seizures during Year 2 post-msTBI (Model 3) and predicting new seizures only during Year 2 (Model 4). We assessed model sensitivity when keeping specificity ≥.60, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and AUROC model performance through 5-fold cross-validation (CV).

Results

Model 1 (73.8% men, 44.1 ± 19.7 years, 76.1% moderate TBI) had a model sensitivity = 76.00% and average AUROC = .73 ± .02 in 5-fold CV. Model 2 had a model sensitivity = 72.16% and average AUROC = .70 ± .02 in 5-fold CV. Model 3 had a sensitivity = 86.63% and average AUROC = .84 ± .03 in 5-fold CV. Model 4 had a sensitivity = 73.68% and average AUROC = .67 ± .03 in 5-fold CV. Cranial surgeries, acute care seizures, intracranial fragments, and traumatic hemorrhages were consistent predictors across all models. Demographic and mental health variables contributed to some models. Simulated, clinical examples model individual PTE predictions.

Significance

Using information available, acute-care, and year-1 post-injury data, parsimonious quantitative epilepsy prediction models following msTBI may facilitate timely evidence-based PTE prognostication within a 2-year period. We developed interactive web-based tools for testing prediction model external validity among independent cohorts. Individualized PTE risk may inform clinical trial development/design and clinical decision support tools for this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of antiseizure medication concentration ranges in blood samples using an automated big data approach. Immunity and neuroinflammation in early stages of life and epilepsy. Long-term safety and effectiveness of fenfluramine in children and adults with Dravet syndrome. Prognostic value of interictal epileptiform discharges on routine EEG in adults with epilepsy. Psychopathology in children before and after epilepsy surgery: a prospective controlled study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1