{"title":"出院后营养状况的变化预测急性失代偿性HFpEF患者的预后。","authors":"Takashi Kitao, Shungo Hikoso, Shunsuke Tamaki, Masahiro Seo, Masamichi Yano, Takaharu Hayashi, Akito Nakagawa, Yusuke Nakagawa, Yohei Sotomi, Daisaku Nakatani, Takahisa Yamada, Yoshio Yasumura, Yasushi Sakata","doi":"10.1007/s00380-024-02499-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Undernutrition has been identified as a poor prognostic factor in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of changes in nutritional status from discharge to one year post-discharge on the prognosis of patients with HFpEF. Initially, 547 HFpEF cases were classified into a normal nutrition group (NN) (n = 130) and an undernutrition group (UN) (n = 417), according to Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) scores at discharge. These groups were further subdivided according to CONUT scores one year post-discharge into NN (G1, n = 88) and UN (G2, n = 42), and NN (G3, n = 147) and UN (G4, n = 270), respectively. The primary end point was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure readmission after the visit one year post-discharge. Normal nutrition was defined as a CONUT score of 0 or 1, and undernutrition as a CONUT score of ≥ 2. We compared the incidence rates of the primary end point between G1 and G2, and G3 and G4, and identified predictors for abnormalization or normalization of CONUT score one year post-discharge, as well as covarying factors with change in CONUT. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, abnormalization of CONUT score was associated with an increased risk of the primary end point (adjusted HR [hazard ratio]: 2.87, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 1.32-6.22, p = 0.008), while normalization of CONUT was associated with a reduced risk (adjusted HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.23-0.67, p < 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis of patients with normal nutrition at discharge, the Euro Qol 5 Dimension score was identified as an independent predictor for abnormalization of CONUT score one year post-discharge (OR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.43, p = 0.023). Among patients with undernutrition at discharge, prior heart failure hospitalization was the independent predictor for normalization of CONUT score (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.20-0.66, p < 0.001). In a multivariate linear regression analysis, independent covariates associated with changes in CONUT included hemoglobin (β = - 0.297, p < 0.001), C-reactive protein (β = 0.349, p < 0.001), and log NT-proBNP (β = 0.142, p < 0.001). Post-discharge abnormalization or normalization of CONUT scores has prognostic impact on patients with HFpEF. Changes in CONUT may independently correlate with changes in hematopoiesis, inflammation, and fluid retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-discharge changes in nutritional status predict prognosis in patients with acute decompensated HFpEF from the PURSUIT-HFpEF Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Takashi Kitao, Shungo Hikoso, Shunsuke Tamaki, Masahiro Seo, Masamichi Yano, Takaharu Hayashi, Akito Nakagawa, Yusuke Nakagawa, Yohei Sotomi, Daisaku Nakatani, Takahisa Yamada, Yoshio Yasumura, Yasushi Sakata\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00380-024-02499-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Undernutrition has been identified as a poor prognostic factor in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of changes in nutritional status from discharge to one year post-discharge on the prognosis of patients with HFpEF. Initially, 547 HFpEF cases were classified into a normal nutrition group (NN) (n = 130) and an undernutrition group (UN) (n = 417), according to Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) scores at discharge. These groups were further subdivided according to CONUT scores one year post-discharge into NN (G1, n = 88) and UN (G2, n = 42), and NN (G3, n = 147) and UN (G4, n = 270), respectively. The primary end point was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure readmission after the visit one year post-discharge. Normal nutrition was defined as a CONUT score of 0 or 1, and undernutrition as a CONUT score of ≥ 2. We compared the incidence rates of the primary end point between G1 and G2, and G3 and G4, and identified predictors for abnormalization or normalization of CONUT score one year post-discharge, as well as covarying factors with change in CONUT. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, abnormalization of CONUT score was associated with an increased risk of the primary end point (adjusted HR [hazard ratio]: 2.87, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 1.32-6.22, p = 0.008), while normalization of CONUT was associated with a reduced risk (adjusted HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.23-0.67, p < 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis of patients with normal nutrition at discharge, the Euro Qol 5 Dimension score was identified as an independent predictor for abnormalization of CONUT score one year post-discharge (OR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.43, p = 0.023). Among patients with undernutrition at discharge, prior heart failure hospitalization was the independent predictor for normalization of CONUT score (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.20-0.66, p < 0.001). In a multivariate linear regression analysis, independent covariates associated with changes in CONUT included hemoglobin (β = - 0.297, p < 0.001), C-reactive protein (β = 0.349, p < 0.001), and log NT-proBNP (β = 0.142, p < 0.001). Post-discharge abnormalization or normalization of CONUT scores has prognostic impact on patients with HFpEF. Changes in CONUT may independently correlate with changes in hematopoiesis, inflammation, and fluid retention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart and Vessels\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart and Vessels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02499-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02499-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
营养不良已被确定为保存射血分数(HFpEF)心力衰竭的不良预后因素。本研究旨在评估出院至出院后1年营养状况变化对HFpEF患者预后的影响。最初,547例HFpEF患者根据出院时的控制营养状况(CONUT)评分分为正常营养组(NN) (n = 130)和营养不足组(UN) (n = 417)。根据出院后1年CONUT评分进一步细分为NN组(G1, n = 88)和UN组(G2, n = 42), NN组(G3, n = 147)和UN组(G4, n = 270)。主要终点定义为出院一年后就诊后全因死亡率或心力衰竭再入院的综合。营养正常定义为CONUT评分为0或1,营养不良定义为CONUT评分≥2。我们比较了G1和G2、G3和G4的主要终点发生率,并确定了出院后1年CONUT评分异常或正常化的预测因素,以及与CONUT变化相关的协变因素。在多变量Cox比例风险模型中,CONUT评分异常与主要终点风险增加相关(校正HR[风险比]:2.87,95% CI[置信区间]:1.32-6.22,p = 0.008),而CONUT评分正常化与风险降低相关(校正HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.23-0.67, p = 0.008)
Post-discharge changes in nutritional status predict prognosis in patients with acute decompensated HFpEF from the PURSUIT-HFpEF Registry.
Undernutrition has been identified as a poor prognostic factor in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of changes in nutritional status from discharge to one year post-discharge on the prognosis of patients with HFpEF. Initially, 547 HFpEF cases were classified into a normal nutrition group (NN) (n = 130) and an undernutrition group (UN) (n = 417), according to Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) scores at discharge. These groups were further subdivided according to CONUT scores one year post-discharge into NN (G1, n = 88) and UN (G2, n = 42), and NN (G3, n = 147) and UN (G4, n = 270), respectively. The primary end point was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure readmission after the visit one year post-discharge. Normal nutrition was defined as a CONUT score of 0 or 1, and undernutrition as a CONUT score of ≥ 2. We compared the incidence rates of the primary end point between G1 and G2, and G3 and G4, and identified predictors for abnormalization or normalization of CONUT score one year post-discharge, as well as covarying factors with change in CONUT. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, abnormalization of CONUT score was associated with an increased risk of the primary end point (adjusted HR [hazard ratio]: 2.87, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 1.32-6.22, p = 0.008), while normalization of CONUT was associated with a reduced risk (adjusted HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.23-0.67, p < 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis of patients with normal nutrition at discharge, the Euro Qol 5 Dimension score was identified as an independent predictor for abnormalization of CONUT score one year post-discharge (OR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.43, p = 0.023). Among patients with undernutrition at discharge, prior heart failure hospitalization was the independent predictor for normalization of CONUT score (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.20-0.66, p < 0.001). In a multivariate linear regression analysis, independent covariates associated with changes in CONUT included hemoglobin (β = - 0.297, p < 0.001), C-reactive protein (β = 0.349, p < 0.001), and log NT-proBNP (β = 0.142, p < 0.001). Post-discharge abnormalization or normalization of CONUT scores has prognostic impact on patients with HFpEF. Changes in CONUT may independently correlate with changes in hematopoiesis, inflammation, and fluid retention.
期刊介绍:
Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.