我们如何应对多重耐药细菌的威胁?2016 - 2020年法国、英国和德国HTA机构抗生素评估比较

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1017/S0266462324000552
Rémy Dumont, Etienne Lengliné, Clara Delorme, Jean-Pierre Bru, Sévérine Ansart, Elisabeth Aslangul, Sophie Kelley, Pierre Cochat, Sylvie Chevret, Thierno Diatta
{"title":"我们如何应对多重耐药细菌的威胁?2016 - 2020年法国、英国和德国HTA机构抗生素评估比较","authors":"Rémy Dumont, Etienne Lengliné, Clara Delorme, Jean-Pierre Bru, Sévérine Ansart, Elisabeth Aslangul, Sophie Kelley, Pierre Cochat, Sylvie Chevret, Thierno Diatta","doi":"10.1017/S0266462324000552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a worldwide growing concern over the past decades. Thus, encouraging manufacturers to develop new antibiotics is needed. We hypothesised that transparency on the regulatory appraisals of antibiotics would provide an incentive to pharmaceutical development. We thus aimed at reporting the French health technology assessment (HTA) opinions and reimbursement decision on antibiotics to those German (G-BA) and English (NICE) HTA bodies.A qualitative analysis of the Transparency Committee of the French National Authority for Health (TC-HAS) opinions regarding antibiotics assessment between 2016 and 2020 was performed. Decisions of reimbursement by TC-HAS were compared to those from G-BA and NICE when available. TC-HAS recognized a clinical benefit (CB) for 15/15 evaluated indications, a clinical added value for 9/15, and a public health interest for 8/15. Among the valued antibiotics by HAS, 5 were recommended for restricted use as a \"reserve\" to protect against the risk of resistance emergence. A comparison of HTA opinions was possible across HTA for only 8 antibiotics. The G-BA granted a reserve status for 4 drugs and NICE a reserve with restricted use for 5 antibiotics. Three of these antibiotics were positioned similarly by the English, German, and French HTA bodies. This qualitative analysis of HTA opinions between different European HTA bodies shows a consistent reimbursement decision of antibiotics against MDR bacteria and tuberculosis besides the differences in the applied assessment methods. This work also shows how HTA bodies could recognize a clinical added value in a context of the emergence of antibiotic resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":"40 1","pages":"e72"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do we respond to the threat of multidrug-resistant bacteria? Comparison of antibiotic appraisals from 2016 to 2020 of the French, English, and German HTA agencies.\",\"authors\":\"Rémy Dumont, Etienne Lengliné, Clara Delorme, Jean-Pierre Bru, Sévérine Ansart, Elisabeth Aslangul, Sophie Kelley, Pierre Cochat, Sylvie Chevret, Thierno Diatta\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0266462324000552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a worldwide growing concern over the past decades. Thus, encouraging manufacturers to develop new antibiotics is needed. We hypothesised that transparency on the regulatory appraisals of antibiotics would provide an incentive to pharmaceutical development. We thus aimed at reporting the French health technology assessment (HTA) opinions and reimbursement decision on antibiotics to those German (G-BA) and English (NICE) HTA bodies.A qualitative analysis of the Transparency Committee of the French National Authority for Health (TC-HAS) opinions regarding antibiotics assessment between 2016 and 2020 was performed. Decisions of reimbursement by TC-HAS were compared to those from G-BA and NICE when available. TC-HAS recognized a clinical benefit (CB) for 15/15 evaluated indications, a clinical added value for 9/15, and a public health interest for 8/15. Among the valued antibiotics by HAS, 5 were recommended for restricted use as a \\\"reserve\\\" to protect against the risk of resistance emergence. A comparison of HTA opinions was possible across HTA for only 8 antibiotics. The G-BA granted a reserve status for 4 drugs and NICE a reserve with restricted use for 5 antibiotics. Three of these antibiotics were positioned similarly by the English, German, and French HTA bodies. This qualitative analysis of HTA opinions between different European HTA bodies shows a consistent reimbursement decision of antibiotics against MDR bacteria and tuberculosis besides the differences in the applied assessment methods. This work also shows how HTA bodies could recognize a clinical added value in a context of the emergence of antibiotic resistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"e72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324000552\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324000552","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,抗菌素耐药性(AMR)已经成为一个全球日益关注的问题。因此,鼓励制造商开发新的抗生素是必要的。我们假设,抗生素监管评估的透明度将为药物开发提供激励。因此,我们旨在向德国(G-BA)和英国(NICE)卫生技术评估机构报告法国卫生技术评估(HTA)的意见和抗生素的报销决定。对法国国家卫生管理局透明委员会(TC-HAS)关于2016年至2020年抗生素评估的意见进行定性分析。如果可以的话,将TC-HAS的报销决定与G-BA和NICE的报销决定进行比较。TC-HAS认可15/15的临床获益(CB), 9/15的临床附加价值,8/15的公共卫生利益。在HAS评价的抗生素中,建议限制使用5种作为“储备”,以防止出现耐药性风险。仅对8种抗生素的HTA评价可以进行比较。G-BA授予4种药物储备地位,NICE授予5种抗生素限制使用储备地位。其中三种抗生素在英国、德国和法国的HTA机构中定位相似。通过对欧洲不同HTA机构间HTA意见的定性分析,除了应用评估方法的差异外,MDR细菌和结核病抗生素的报销决策是一致的。这项工作还显示了HTA体如何在抗生素耐药性出现的背景下识别临床附加价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How do we respond to the threat of multidrug-resistant bacteria? Comparison of antibiotic appraisals from 2016 to 2020 of the French, English, and German HTA agencies.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a worldwide growing concern over the past decades. Thus, encouraging manufacturers to develop new antibiotics is needed. We hypothesised that transparency on the regulatory appraisals of antibiotics would provide an incentive to pharmaceutical development. We thus aimed at reporting the French health technology assessment (HTA) opinions and reimbursement decision on antibiotics to those German (G-BA) and English (NICE) HTA bodies.A qualitative analysis of the Transparency Committee of the French National Authority for Health (TC-HAS) opinions regarding antibiotics assessment between 2016 and 2020 was performed. Decisions of reimbursement by TC-HAS were compared to those from G-BA and NICE when available. TC-HAS recognized a clinical benefit (CB) for 15/15 evaluated indications, a clinical added value for 9/15, and a public health interest for 8/15. Among the valued antibiotics by HAS, 5 were recommended for restricted use as a "reserve" to protect against the risk of resistance emergence. A comparison of HTA opinions was possible across HTA for only 8 antibiotics. The G-BA granted a reserve status for 4 drugs and NICE a reserve with restricted use for 5 antibiotics. Three of these antibiotics were positioned similarly by the English, German, and French HTA bodies. This qualitative analysis of HTA opinions between different European HTA bodies shows a consistent reimbursement decision of antibiotics against MDR bacteria and tuberculosis besides the differences in the applied assessment methods. This work also shows how HTA bodies could recognize a clinical added value in a context of the emergence of antibiotic resistance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
期刊最新文献
A MINIMUM DATASET FOR DESTINATION THERAPY WITH LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE: THE EVIDENCE THAT MATTERS TO DECISION MAKERS. A decision-analytic method to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of remote monitoring technology for chronic depression. Development of a value assessment framework for Health Technology Assessment in rare diseases drugs: insights from a Delphi study in Brazil. Good Practices for Health Technology Assessment Guideline Development: A Report of the Health Technology Assessment International, HTAsiaLink, and ISPOR Special Task Force. How can actuarial science contribute to the field of health technology assessment? An interdisciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1