为住院医师提供在线异步研究培训。

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2024-10-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.631
Jason T Blackard, Jacqueline M Knapke, Stephanie Schuckman, Jennifer Veevers, William D Hardie, Ruchi Yadav, Alexa Kahn, Patrick Lee, Sima Terebelo, Patrick H Ryan
{"title":"为住院医师提供在线异步研究培训。","authors":"Jason T Blackard, Jacqueline M Knapke, Stephanie Schuckman, Jennifer Veevers, William D Hardie, Ruchi Yadav, Alexa Kahn, Patrick Lee, Sima Terebelo, Patrick H Ryan","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scholarly activity is a key component of most residency programmes. To establish fundamental research skills and fill gaps within training curricula, we developed an online, asynchronous set of modules called <i>Research 101</i> to introduce trainees to various topics that are germane to the conduct of research and evaluated its effectiveness in resident research education. <i>Research 101</i> was utilised by residents at One Brooklyn Health in Brooklyn, NY. Resident knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction were assessed using pre- and post-module surveys with 5-point Likert scaled questions, open-ended text responses, and a multiple-choice quiz. Pre-module survey results indicated that residents were most confident with the <i>Aligning expectations</i>, <i>Introduction to research</i>, and <i>Study design and data analysis basics</i> modules and least confident with the <i>Submitting an Institutional Review Board protocol</i> and <i>Presenting your summer research</i> modules. Post-module survey responses demonstrated increased learning compared to pre-module results for all modules and learning objectives (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). \"This module met my needs\" was endorsed 91.4% of the time. The median score for the final quiz that consisted of 25 multiple-choice questions was 23. Thematic analysis of open-ended post-module survey responses identified multiple strengths and opportunities for improvement in course content and instructional methods. These data demonstrate that residents benefit from completion of <i>Research 101</i>, as post-module survey scores were significantly higher than pre-module survey scores for all modules and questions, final quiz scores were high, and open-ended responses highlighted opportunities for additional resident learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"e180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online, asynchronous training in research for residents.\",\"authors\":\"Jason T Blackard, Jacqueline M Knapke, Stephanie Schuckman, Jennifer Veevers, William D Hardie, Ruchi Yadav, Alexa Kahn, Patrick Lee, Sima Terebelo, Patrick H Ryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cts.2024.631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Scholarly activity is a key component of most residency programmes. To establish fundamental research skills and fill gaps within training curricula, we developed an online, asynchronous set of modules called <i>Research 101</i> to introduce trainees to various topics that are germane to the conduct of research and evaluated its effectiveness in resident research education. <i>Research 101</i> was utilised by residents at One Brooklyn Health in Brooklyn, NY. Resident knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction were assessed using pre- and post-module surveys with 5-point Likert scaled questions, open-ended text responses, and a multiple-choice quiz. Pre-module survey results indicated that residents were most confident with the <i>Aligning expectations</i>, <i>Introduction to research</i>, and <i>Study design and data analysis basics</i> modules and least confident with the <i>Submitting an Institutional Review Board protocol</i> and <i>Presenting your summer research</i> modules. Post-module survey responses demonstrated increased learning compared to pre-module results for all modules and learning objectives (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). \\\"This module met my needs\\\" was endorsed 91.4% of the time. The median score for the final quiz that consisted of 25 multiple-choice questions was 23. Thematic analysis of open-ended post-module survey responses identified multiple strengths and opportunities for improvement in course content and instructional methods. These data demonstrate that residents benefit from completion of <i>Research 101</i>, as post-module survey scores were significantly higher than pre-module survey scores for all modules and questions, final quiz scores were high, and open-ended responses highlighted opportunities for additional resident learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"e180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626569/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学术活动是大多数住院医师项目的关键组成部分。为了建立基本的研究技能并填补培训课程中的空白,我们开发了一套名为“研究101”的在线异步模块,向学员介绍与研究行为相关的各种主题,并评估其在住院研究教育中的有效性。研究101被纽约布鲁克林的一个布鲁克林健康中心的居民使用。居民的知识,信心和满意度评估使用前后模块调查与五点李克特量表问题,开放式文本回答,和多项选择测验。模块前调查结果表明,住院医师对预期调整、研究介绍、研究设计和数据分析基础模块最有信心,对提交机构审查委员会协议和展示您的暑期研究模块最不自信。模块后的调查结果显示,与模块前相比,所有模块和学习目标的学习效果都有所提高(p < 0.0001)。91.4%的人赞同“这个模块满足了我的需求”。由25道选择题组成的期末测验的中位数是23分。开放式模块后调查回应的专题分析确定了课程内容和教学方法的多种优势和改进机会。这些数据表明,居民从研究101的完成中受益,因为模块后的调查得分明显高于模块前的调查得分,所有模块和问题,最终测验得分很高,开放式回答强调了额外的居民学习机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Online, asynchronous training in research for residents.

Scholarly activity is a key component of most residency programmes. To establish fundamental research skills and fill gaps within training curricula, we developed an online, asynchronous set of modules called Research 101 to introduce trainees to various topics that are germane to the conduct of research and evaluated its effectiveness in resident research education. Research 101 was utilised by residents at One Brooklyn Health in Brooklyn, NY. Resident knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction were assessed using pre- and post-module surveys with 5-point Likert scaled questions, open-ended text responses, and a multiple-choice quiz. Pre-module survey results indicated that residents were most confident with the Aligning expectations, Introduction to research, and Study design and data analysis basics modules and least confident with the Submitting an Institutional Review Board protocol and Presenting your summer research modules. Post-module survey responses demonstrated increased learning compared to pre-module results for all modules and learning objectives (p < 0.0001). "This module met my needs" was endorsed 91.4% of the time. The median score for the final quiz that consisted of 25 multiple-choice questions was 23. Thematic analysis of open-ended post-module survey responses identified multiple strengths and opportunities for improvement in course content and instructional methods. These data demonstrate that residents benefit from completion of Research 101, as post-module survey scores were significantly higher than pre-module survey scores for all modules and questions, final quiz scores were high, and open-ended responses highlighted opportunities for additional resident learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Using technology to increase reach and optimize consent experience for a large-scale research program. Evaluating translational science knowledge gains following an online short course for a general scientific audience. Health impacts of a remotely delivered prolonged nightly fasting intervention in stressed adults with memory decline and obesity: A nationwide randomized controlled pilot trial - ADDENDUM. The changing demographics and severity in hospitalized patients across COVID-19 variants: A national cohort study. A pilot randomized controlled trial of the iPeer2Peer program in adolescents with sickle cell disease: A mixed method study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1