根据2015年NIOSH蒸汽密封性能协议对七个封闭系统传输装置进行评估。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1177/10781552241304638
Lori T Armistead, Michael Stepanovic, Megan A Earnhart, Stephen F Eckel
{"title":"根据2015年NIOSH蒸汽密封性能协议对七个封闭系统传输装置进行评估。","authors":"Lori T Armistead, Michael Stepanovic, Megan A Earnhart, Stephen F Eckel","doi":"10.1177/10781552241304638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the effectiveness of seven different closed system transfer device (CSTD) product lines following the 2015 NIOSH Vapor Containment Performance Protocol, using a Gasmet™ DX5000 Terra multigas FTIR analyzer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven different CSTD systems were assessed using a two-task evaluation on their capacity to contain the NIOSH-specified challenge agent, 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA). Task 1 simulated reconstitution and compounding steps while Task 2 simulated compounding and administration steps. Vial adapters, syringe adapters, IV bag adapters, and y-site adapters from each CSTD product line were tested. All tasks were performed in a custom-built environmental test chamber as outlined in the 2015 NIOSH protocol, with isopropyl alcohol (IPA) release detected and measured by a Gasmet™ analyzer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BD PhaSeal™ CSTD product line effectively contained IPA vapor during both tasks with a task performance metric of 0.00 ppm for each task. BD PhaSeal™ Optima, Equashield<sup>®</sup>, Yukon Medical Arisure<sup>®</sup>, ICU Medical ChemoLock™, BD Texium™, and ICU Medical ChemoClave™ non-vented CSTDs demonstrated detectable and quantifiable IPA leakage during each task. The leaks occurred at different steps within the protocol, and the amount of IPA vapor detected varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, one CSTD product line (i.e., PhaSeal™) successfully contained IPA vapor below the Gasmet™ analyzer's limit of quantification (LOQ) for IPA of 0.04 ppm for both Tasks 1 and 2, demonstrating it to be a validated closed system per the study protocol. All other CSTD product lines demonstrated some level of IPA leakage with task performance metrics above the analyzer's LOQ. However, these results tell us little about how well CSTDs contain hazardous drugs (HDs), as a universal HD surrogate for effectively assessing the closedness of all types of CSTDs has yet to be identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552241304638"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of seven closed system transfer devices in accordance with the 2015 NIOSH vapor containment performance protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Lori T Armistead, Michael Stepanovic, Megan A Earnhart, Stephen F Eckel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10781552241304638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the effectiveness of seven different closed system transfer device (CSTD) product lines following the 2015 NIOSH Vapor Containment Performance Protocol, using a Gasmet™ DX5000 Terra multigas FTIR analyzer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven different CSTD systems were assessed using a two-task evaluation on their capacity to contain the NIOSH-specified challenge agent, 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA). Task 1 simulated reconstitution and compounding steps while Task 2 simulated compounding and administration steps. Vial adapters, syringe adapters, IV bag adapters, and y-site adapters from each CSTD product line were tested. All tasks were performed in a custom-built environmental test chamber as outlined in the 2015 NIOSH protocol, with isopropyl alcohol (IPA) release detected and measured by a Gasmet™ analyzer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BD PhaSeal™ CSTD product line effectively contained IPA vapor during both tasks with a task performance metric of 0.00 ppm for each task. BD PhaSeal™ Optima, Equashield<sup>®</sup>, Yukon Medical Arisure<sup>®</sup>, ICU Medical ChemoLock™, BD Texium™, and ICU Medical ChemoClave™ non-vented CSTDs demonstrated detectable and quantifiable IPA leakage during each task. The leaks occurred at different steps within the protocol, and the amount of IPA vapor detected varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, one CSTD product line (i.e., PhaSeal™) successfully contained IPA vapor below the Gasmet™ analyzer's limit of quantification (LOQ) for IPA of 0.04 ppm for both Tasks 1 and 2, demonstrating it to be a validated closed system per the study protocol. All other CSTD product lines demonstrated some level of IPA leakage with task performance metrics above the analyzer's LOQ. However, these results tell us little about how well CSTDs contain hazardous drugs (HDs), as a universal HD surrogate for effectively assessing the closedness of all types of CSTDs has yet to be identified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10781552241304638\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241304638\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241304638","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是使用Gasmet™DX5000 Terra多气体FTIR分析仪,根据2015年NIOSH蒸汽密封性能协议,评估和比较7种不同的封闭系统传输装置(CSTD)产品线的有效性。方法:采用双任务评价法对7种不同的CSTD系统进行了niosh指定攻毒剂70%异丙醇(IPA)的容量评估。任务1模拟重组和复合步骤,而任务2模拟复合和管理步骤。测试了每个CSTD产品线的小瓶适配器、注射器适配器、静脉输液袋适配器和y-site适配器。根据2015年NIOSH协议,所有任务都在定制的环境测试室中进行,使用Gasmet™分析仪检测和测量异丙醇(IPA)释放。结果:BD PhaSeal™CSTD产品线在两项任务中都有效地含有IPA蒸气,每项任务的任务性能指标为0.00 ppm。BD PhaSeal™Optima、Equashield®、Yukon Medical Arisure®、ICU Medical ChemoLock™、BD Texium™和ICU Medical ChemoClave™非通气cstd在每次任务中都显示出可检测和可量化的IPA泄漏。泄漏发生在协议的不同步骤,检测到的IPA蒸气量各不相同。结论:在本研究中,一条CSTD产品线(即PhaSeal™)在任务1和任务2中成功地将IPA蒸汽包含在Gasmet™分析仪的定量限(LOQ) 0.04 ppm以下,证明它是一个根据研究方案验证的封闭系统。所有其他CSTD产品线都表现出一定程度的IPA泄漏,任务性能指标高于分析仪的LOQ。然而,这些结果几乎没有告诉我们cstd含有有害药物的程度,因为有效评估所有类型cstd的封闭性的通用HD替代品尚未确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An assessment of seven closed system transfer devices in accordance with the 2015 NIOSH vapor containment performance protocol.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the effectiveness of seven different closed system transfer device (CSTD) product lines following the 2015 NIOSH Vapor Containment Performance Protocol, using a Gasmet™ DX5000 Terra multigas FTIR analyzer.

Methods: Seven different CSTD systems were assessed using a two-task evaluation on their capacity to contain the NIOSH-specified challenge agent, 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA). Task 1 simulated reconstitution and compounding steps while Task 2 simulated compounding and administration steps. Vial adapters, syringe adapters, IV bag adapters, and y-site adapters from each CSTD product line were tested. All tasks were performed in a custom-built environmental test chamber as outlined in the 2015 NIOSH protocol, with isopropyl alcohol (IPA) release detected and measured by a Gasmet™ analyzer.

Results: The BD PhaSeal™ CSTD product line effectively contained IPA vapor during both tasks with a task performance metric of 0.00 ppm for each task. BD PhaSeal™ Optima, Equashield®, Yukon Medical Arisure®, ICU Medical ChemoLock™, BD Texium™, and ICU Medical ChemoClave™ non-vented CSTDs demonstrated detectable and quantifiable IPA leakage during each task. The leaks occurred at different steps within the protocol, and the amount of IPA vapor detected varied.

Conclusion: In this study, one CSTD product line (i.e., PhaSeal™) successfully contained IPA vapor below the Gasmet™ analyzer's limit of quantification (LOQ) for IPA of 0.04 ppm for both Tasks 1 and 2, demonstrating it to be a validated closed system per the study protocol. All other CSTD product lines demonstrated some level of IPA leakage with task performance metrics above the analyzer's LOQ. However, these results tell us little about how well CSTDs contain hazardous drugs (HDs), as a universal HD surrogate for effectively assessing the closedness of all types of CSTDs has yet to be identified.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic outcomes of patients with acute erythroid leukemia treated with hypomethylating agents. Irinotecan-induced dysarthria and management. Assessing antineoplastic drug contamination in South African oncology pharmacies: Workplace and biological monitoring. Carbon footprint of a chemotherapy production unit within a hospital pharmacy: Time for green pharmacy. BRAF inhibitors with or without MEK inhibitors in advanced BRAF-positive non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1