InnovEyes视图平台在比较光线跟踪引导LASIK和地形引导LASIK中的应用研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of refractive surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20241030-03
Xinfang Cao, Jun Zhang, Jie Shao, Yonggang Zhang, Li Zheng
{"title":"InnovEyes视图平台在比较光线跟踪引导LASIK和地形引导LASIK中的应用研究。","authors":"Xinfang Cao, Jun Zhang, Jie Shao, Yonggang Zhang, Li Zheng","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20241030-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the performance of the InnovEyes Sightmap platform (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) in refractive surgery by comparing the visual acuity and higher order aberrations (HOAs) between ray-tracing-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and topography-guided LASIK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled participants who underwent either ray-tracing-guided LASIK or topography-guided LASIK. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations were performed preoperatively, as well as at 1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Patients in the ray-tracing-guided LASIK group underwent wavefront, tomography, and biometry assessment using the InnovEyes Sightmap diagnostic device. Assessments included visual acuity, manifest refraction, and whole-eye HOAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 eyes treated with ray-tracing-guided LASIK and 42 eyes treated with topography-guided LASIK were analyzed. Both strategies demonstrated comparable good refraction accuracy and refractive stability (<i>P</i> > .05). The ray-tracing-guided LASIK group exhibited significantly better postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) compared to the topography-guided LASIK group (-0.12 ± 0.05 vs -0.07 ± 0.04 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, respectively; <i>P</i> < .05), with 48% of eyes achieving a UDVA of 20/12.5 or better. Ray-tracing-guided LASIK induced a small but statistically significant increase in HOAs and vertical coma aberration, along with a significant reduction in spherical aberration (<i>P</i> < .05). In contrast, topography-guided LASIK resulted in a significant increase in vertical coma (<i>P</i> < .05) without significant changes in overall HOAs or spherical aberration (<i>P</i> > .05). At 3 months postoperatively, spherical aberration was significantly different between the two groups (-0.021 ± 0.031 vs 0.054 ± 0.122 µm, respectively; <i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The InnovEyes Sightmap platform's ray-tracing-guided LASIK demonstrated potential advantages in visual acuity outcomes compared to topography-guided LASIK. The observed negative shift in spherical aberration, characterized by a lower absolute value, may have contributed to the enhanced visual acuity results. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2024;40(12):e994-e1002.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"40 12","pages":"e994-e1002"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of the InnovEyes Sightmap Platform in Comparing Ray-Tracing-Guided LASIK and Topography-Guided LASIK.\",\"authors\":\"Xinfang Cao, Jun Zhang, Jie Shao, Yonggang Zhang, Li Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20241030-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the performance of the InnovEyes Sightmap platform (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) in refractive surgery by comparing the visual acuity and higher order aberrations (HOAs) between ray-tracing-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and topography-guided LASIK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled participants who underwent either ray-tracing-guided LASIK or topography-guided LASIK. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations were performed preoperatively, as well as at 1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Patients in the ray-tracing-guided LASIK group underwent wavefront, tomography, and biometry assessment using the InnovEyes Sightmap diagnostic device. Assessments included visual acuity, manifest refraction, and whole-eye HOAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 eyes treated with ray-tracing-guided LASIK and 42 eyes treated with topography-guided LASIK were analyzed. Both strategies demonstrated comparable good refraction accuracy and refractive stability (<i>P</i> > .05). The ray-tracing-guided LASIK group exhibited significantly better postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) compared to the topography-guided LASIK group (-0.12 ± 0.05 vs -0.07 ± 0.04 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, respectively; <i>P</i> < .05), with 48% of eyes achieving a UDVA of 20/12.5 or better. Ray-tracing-guided LASIK induced a small but statistically significant increase in HOAs and vertical coma aberration, along with a significant reduction in spherical aberration (<i>P</i> < .05). In contrast, topography-guided LASIK resulted in a significant increase in vertical coma (<i>P</i> < .05) without significant changes in overall HOAs or spherical aberration (<i>P</i> > .05). At 3 months postoperatively, spherical aberration was significantly different between the two groups (-0.021 ± 0.031 vs 0.054 ± 0.122 µm, respectively; <i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The InnovEyes Sightmap platform's ray-tracing-guided LASIK demonstrated potential advantages in visual acuity outcomes compared to topography-guided LASIK. The observed negative shift in spherical aberration, characterized by a lower absolute value, may have contributed to the enhanced visual acuity results. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2024;40(12):e994-e1002.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"40 12\",\"pages\":\"e994-e1002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20241030-03\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20241030-03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过比较射线追踪引导激光原位角膜磨磨术(LASIK)和地形引导激光原位角膜磨磨术(LASIK)的视力和高阶像差(HOAs),评价InnovEyes视力图平台(Alcon Laboratories, Inc)在屈光手术中的性能。方法:这项前瞻性研究招募了接受射线追踪引导LASIK或地形引导LASIK的参与者。术前、术后1天、2周、1个月、3个月进行全面眼科评价。射线追踪引导的LASIK组患者使用InnovEyes视力图诊断设备进行波前、断层扫描和生物测量评估。评估包括视力、明显屈光和全眼hoa。结果:对42只眼行射线追踪引导LASIK和42只眼行地形引导LASIK进行分析。两种策略均显示出相当好的折射精度和折射稳定性(P < 0.05)。与地形引导组相比,光迹引导组术后未矫正距离视力(UDVA)显著提高(最小分辨角的-0.12±0.05比-0.07±0.04对数);P < 0.05), 48%的眼睛UDVA达到20/12.5或更好。射线追踪引导的LASIK导致hoa和垂直彗差的小幅增加,但具有统计学意义,同时球差显著降低(P < 0.05)。相比之下,地形引导的LASIK导致垂直昏迷显著增加(P < 0.05),但总体hoa和球差没有显著变化(P < 0.05)。术后3个月,两组的球差差异有统计学意义(分别为-0.021±0.031 vs 0.054±0.122µm);P < 0.05)。结论:与地形引导LASIK相比,InnovEyes视力地图平台的光线追踪引导LASIK在视力结果方面具有潜在优势。观测到的球差负移,其特点是绝对值较低,可能有助于提高视力的结果。[J].中华眼科杂志,2011;35(6):559 - 561。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study of the InnovEyes Sightmap Platform in Comparing Ray-Tracing-Guided LASIK and Topography-Guided LASIK.

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of the InnovEyes Sightmap platform (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) in refractive surgery by comparing the visual acuity and higher order aberrations (HOAs) between ray-tracing-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and topography-guided LASIK.

Methods: This prospective study enrolled participants who underwent either ray-tracing-guided LASIK or topography-guided LASIK. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations were performed preoperatively, as well as at 1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Patients in the ray-tracing-guided LASIK group underwent wavefront, tomography, and biometry assessment using the InnovEyes Sightmap diagnostic device. Assessments included visual acuity, manifest refraction, and whole-eye HOAs.

Results: A total of 42 eyes treated with ray-tracing-guided LASIK and 42 eyes treated with topography-guided LASIK were analyzed. Both strategies demonstrated comparable good refraction accuracy and refractive stability (P > .05). The ray-tracing-guided LASIK group exhibited significantly better postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) compared to the topography-guided LASIK group (-0.12 ± 0.05 vs -0.07 ± 0.04 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, respectively; P < .05), with 48% of eyes achieving a UDVA of 20/12.5 or better. Ray-tracing-guided LASIK induced a small but statistically significant increase in HOAs and vertical coma aberration, along with a significant reduction in spherical aberration (P < .05). In contrast, topography-guided LASIK resulted in a significant increase in vertical coma (P < .05) without significant changes in overall HOAs or spherical aberration (P > .05). At 3 months postoperatively, spherical aberration was significantly different between the two groups (-0.021 ± 0.031 vs 0.054 ± 0.122 µm, respectively; P < .05).

Conclusions: The InnovEyes Sightmap platform's ray-tracing-guided LASIK demonstrated potential advantages in visual acuity outcomes compared to topography-guided LASIK. The observed negative shift in spherical aberration, characterized by a lower absolute value, may have contributed to the enhanced visual acuity results. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(12):e994-e1002.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Additional Considerations for Interpreting SMILE Outcomes With the VisuMax 800 Platform. Assessing the Visual and Refractive Outcomes of PRESBYOND Laser Blended Vision Treatment in Myopic and Hyperopic Presbyopic Patients in Western Australia. Ocular Residual Astigmatism, Posterior Corneal Astigmatism, and Anterior Corneal Irregularities in Virgin Eyes Undergoing Topography-guided LASIK. Key Surgical Steps for 4-Haptic Delivery Into the Posterior Chamber During Implantable Collamer Lens Surgery. Comparison of Effective Optical Zone, Lenticule Decentration, and Corneal Aberrations Following KLEx Extraction Between the VisuMax 800 and VisuMax 500.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1