InnovEyes视图平台在比较光线跟踪引导LASIK和地形引导LASIK中的应用研究。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of refractive surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20241030-03
Xinfang Cao, Jun Zhang, Jie Shao, Yonggang Zhang, Li Zheng
{"title":"InnovEyes视图平台在比较光线跟踪引导LASIK和地形引导LASIK中的应用研究。","authors":"Xinfang Cao, Jun Zhang, Jie Shao, Yonggang Zhang, Li Zheng","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20241030-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the performance of the InnovEyes Sightmap platform (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) in refractive surgery by comparing the visual acuity and higher order aberrations (HOAs) between ray-tracing-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and topography-guided LASIK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled participants who underwent either ray-tracing-guided LASIK or topography-guided LASIK. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations were performed preoperatively, as well as at 1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Patients in the ray-tracing-guided LASIK group underwent wavefront, tomography, and biometry assessment using the InnovEyes Sightmap diagnostic device. Assessments included visual acuity, manifest refraction, and whole-eye HOAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 eyes treated with ray-tracing-guided LASIK and 42 eyes treated with topography-guided LASIK were analyzed. Both strategies demonstrated comparable good refraction accuracy and refractive stability (<i>P</i> > .05). The ray-tracing-guided LASIK group exhibited significantly better postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) compared to the topography-guided LASIK group (-0.12 ± 0.05 vs -0.07 ± 0.04 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, respectively; <i>P</i> < .05), with 48% of eyes achieving a UDVA of 20/12.5 or better. Ray-tracing-guided LASIK induced a small but statistically significant increase in HOAs and vertical coma aberration, along with a significant reduction in spherical aberration (<i>P</i> < .05). In contrast, topography-guided LASIK resulted in a significant increase in vertical coma (<i>P</i> < .05) without significant changes in overall HOAs or spherical aberration (<i>P</i> > .05). At 3 months postoperatively, spherical aberration was significantly different between the two groups (-0.021 ± 0.031 vs 0.054 ± 0.122 µm, respectively; <i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The InnovEyes Sightmap platform's ray-tracing-guided LASIK demonstrated potential advantages in visual acuity outcomes compared to topography-guided LASIK. The observed negative shift in spherical aberration, characterized by a lower absolute value, may have contributed to the enhanced visual acuity results. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2024;40(12):e994-e1002.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"40 12","pages":"e994-e1002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of the InnovEyes Sightmap Platform in Comparing Ray-Tracing-Guided LASIK and Topography-Guided LASIK.\",\"authors\":\"Xinfang Cao, Jun Zhang, Jie Shao, Yonggang Zhang, Li Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20241030-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the performance of the InnovEyes Sightmap platform (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) in refractive surgery by comparing the visual acuity and higher order aberrations (HOAs) between ray-tracing-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and topography-guided LASIK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled participants who underwent either ray-tracing-guided LASIK or topography-guided LASIK. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations were performed preoperatively, as well as at 1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Patients in the ray-tracing-guided LASIK group underwent wavefront, tomography, and biometry assessment using the InnovEyes Sightmap diagnostic device. Assessments included visual acuity, manifest refraction, and whole-eye HOAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 eyes treated with ray-tracing-guided LASIK and 42 eyes treated with topography-guided LASIK were analyzed. Both strategies demonstrated comparable good refraction accuracy and refractive stability (<i>P</i> > .05). The ray-tracing-guided LASIK group exhibited significantly better postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) compared to the topography-guided LASIK group (-0.12 ± 0.05 vs -0.07 ± 0.04 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, respectively; <i>P</i> < .05), with 48% of eyes achieving a UDVA of 20/12.5 or better. Ray-tracing-guided LASIK induced a small but statistically significant increase in HOAs and vertical coma aberration, along with a significant reduction in spherical aberration (<i>P</i> < .05). In contrast, topography-guided LASIK resulted in a significant increase in vertical coma (<i>P</i> < .05) without significant changes in overall HOAs or spherical aberration (<i>P</i> > .05). At 3 months postoperatively, spherical aberration was significantly different between the two groups (-0.021 ± 0.031 vs 0.054 ± 0.122 µm, respectively; <i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The InnovEyes Sightmap platform's ray-tracing-guided LASIK demonstrated potential advantages in visual acuity outcomes compared to topography-guided LASIK. The observed negative shift in spherical aberration, characterized by a lower absolute value, may have contributed to the enhanced visual acuity results. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2024;40(12):e994-e1002.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"40 12\",\"pages\":\"e994-e1002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20241030-03\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20241030-03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过比较射线追踪引导激光原位角膜磨磨术(LASIK)和地形引导激光原位角膜磨磨术(LASIK)的视力和高阶像差(HOAs),评价InnovEyes视力图平台(Alcon Laboratories, Inc)在屈光手术中的性能。方法:这项前瞻性研究招募了接受射线追踪引导LASIK或地形引导LASIK的参与者。术前、术后1天、2周、1个月、3个月进行全面眼科评价。射线追踪引导的LASIK组患者使用InnovEyes视力图诊断设备进行波前、断层扫描和生物测量评估。评估包括视力、明显屈光和全眼hoa。结果:对42只眼行射线追踪引导LASIK和42只眼行地形引导LASIK进行分析。两种策略均显示出相当好的折射精度和折射稳定性(P < 0.05)。与地形引导组相比,光迹引导组术后未矫正距离视力(UDVA)显著提高(最小分辨角的-0.12±0.05比-0.07±0.04对数);P < 0.05), 48%的眼睛UDVA达到20/12.5或更好。射线追踪引导的LASIK导致hoa和垂直彗差的小幅增加,但具有统计学意义,同时球差显著降低(P < 0.05)。相比之下,地形引导的LASIK导致垂直昏迷显著增加(P < 0.05),但总体hoa和球差没有显著变化(P < 0.05)。术后3个月,两组的球差差异有统计学意义(分别为-0.021±0.031 vs 0.054±0.122µm);P < 0.05)。结论:与地形引导LASIK相比,InnovEyes视力地图平台的光线追踪引导LASIK在视力结果方面具有潜在优势。观测到的球差负移,其特点是绝对值较低,可能有助于提高视力的结果。[J].中华眼科杂志,2011;35(6):559 - 561。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study of the InnovEyes Sightmap Platform in Comparing Ray-Tracing-Guided LASIK and Topography-Guided LASIK.

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of the InnovEyes Sightmap platform (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) in refractive surgery by comparing the visual acuity and higher order aberrations (HOAs) between ray-tracing-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and topography-guided LASIK.

Methods: This prospective study enrolled participants who underwent either ray-tracing-guided LASIK or topography-guided LASIK. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations were performed preoperatively, as well as at 1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Patients in the ray-tracing-guided LASIK group underwent wavefront, tomography, and biometry assessment using the InnovEyes Sightmap diagnostic device. Assessments included visual acuity, manifest refraction, and whole-eye HOAs.

Results: A total of 42 eyes treated with ray-tracing-guided LASIK and 42 eyes treated with topography-guided LASIK were analyzed. Both strategies demonstrated comparable good refraction accuracy and refractive stability (P > .05). The ray-tracing-guided LASIK group exhibited significantly better postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) compared to the topography-guided LASIK group (-0.12 ± 0.05 vs -0.07 ± 0.04 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, respectively; P < .05), with 48% of eyes achieving a UDVA of 20/12.5 or better. Ray-tracing-guided LASIK induced a small but statistically significant increase in HOAs and vertical coma aberration, along with a significant reduction in spherical aberration (P < .05). In contrast, topography-guided LASIK resulted in a significant increase in vertical coma (P < .05) without significant changes in overall HOAs or spherical aberration (P > .05). At 3 months postoperatively, spherical aberration was significantly different between the two groups (-0.021 ± 0.031 vs 0.054 ± 0.122 µm, respectively; P < .05).

Conclusions: The InnovEyes Sightmap platform's ray-tracing-guided LASIK demonstrated potential advantages in visual acuity outcomes compared to topography-guided LASIK. The observed negative shift in spherical aberration, characterized by a lower absolute value, may have contributed to the enhanced visual acuity results. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(12):e994-e1002.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Refractive Outcomes After Scleral Fixation of the Carlevale Intraocular Lens. Reply: Refractive Outcomes After Scleral Fixation of the Carlevale Intraocular Lens. Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction of Bilaterally Implanted Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens: Outcomes of a Multicenter Registry. Prospective Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of Diffractive Trifocal Extended Depth-of-Focus and Diffractive Trifocal Hydrophobic Intraocular Lenses. Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Eye Comparison of the Lenticule Decentration Following SMILE: Coaxially Sighted Corneal Light Reflex Versus Tear Film Mark Centration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1