站立宽度对最大后蹲运动运动学和动力学的影响。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000004949
Stian Larsen, Mark de Zee, Roland van den Tillaar
{"title":"站立宽度对最大后蹲运动运动学和动力学的影响。","authors":"Stian Larsen, Mark de Zee, Roland van den Tillaar","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Larsen, S, Zee, Md, and Tillaar, Rvd. The impact of stance width on kinematics and kinetics during maximum back squats. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): 1-9, 2025-This study compared the lower extremity peak net joint moments (NJMs) and muscle forces between wide and narrow stance widths defined as 1.7 and 0.7 acromion width in the last repetition of the concentric phase in 3 repetition maximum back squats. Twelve recreationally trained men (age:25.3 ± 2.9 years, height:179 ± 7.7 cm, body mass:82.8 ± 6.9 kg) volunteered for the study. The NJMs were estimated using inverse dynamics and individual muscle forces with static optimization. The main findings of interest were that the wide stance resulted in statistically smaller knee flexion angles (Cohen's d: 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -17.96 to -3.18°), knee extension NJMs [d: 1.45; 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.61 Nm·kg-1], and vastii forces [d: 1.3; 95% CI: -27.7 to -0.9.5 N·kg-1] compared with the narrow stance. Moreover, we observed significantly larger hip abduction angles [d: 3.8; 95% CI: 12.04 to 16.86°] for the wide stance. Hence, we suggest that recreationally trained men aiming to optimize muscle forces in the vastii muscles during maximum back squat training should consider adopting a narrow stance.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":"39 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Stance Width on Kinematics and Kinetics During Maximum Back Squats.\",\"authors\":\"Stian Larsen, Mark de Zee, Roland van den Tillaar\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Larsen, S, Zee, Md, and Tillaar, Rvd. The impact of stance width on kinematics and kinetics during maximum back squats. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): 1-9, 2025-This study compared the lower extremity peak net joint moments (NJMs) and muscle forces between wide and narrow stance widths defined as 1.7 and 0.7 acromion width in the last repetition of the concentric phase in 3 repetition maximum back squats. Twelve recreationally trained men (age:25.3 ± 2.9 years, height:179 ± 7.7 cm, body mass:82.8 ± 6.9 kg) volunteered for the study. The NJMs were estimated using inverse dynamics and individual muscle forces with static optimization. The main findings of interest were that the wide stance resulted in statistically smaller knee flexion angles (Cohen's d: 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -17.96 to -3.18°), knee extension NJMs [d: 1.45; 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.61 Nm·kg-1], and vastii forces [d: 1.3; 95% CI: -27.7 to -0.9.5 N·kg-1] compared with the narrow stance. Moreover, we observed significantly larger hip abduction angles [d: 3.8; 95% CI: 12.04 to 16.86°] for the wide stance. Hence, we suggest that recreationally trained men aiming to optimize muscle forces in the vastii muscles during maximum back squat training should consider adopting a narrow stance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004949\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004949","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:Larsen, S, Zee, Md, and Tillaar, Rvd。站立宽度对最大后蹲运动运动学和动力学的影响。本研究比较了3次最大背深蹲最后一次同心圆阶段宽、窄站宽度分别为1.7和0.7肩峰宽度时下肢峰值净关节力矩(NJMs)和肌肉力量。12名男性志愿者(年龄:25.3±2.9岁,身高:179±7.7 cm,体重:82.8±6.9 kg)参加了这项研究。NJMs是通过静态优化的逆动力学和单个肌肉力来估计的。主要的研究结果是,宽站姿导致统计上较小的膝关节屈曲角度(Cohen's d: 0.9;95%可信区间[CI]: -17.96 ~ -3.18°),膝关节伸展NJMs [d: 1.45;95% CI: -1.56 ~ -0.61 Nm·kg-1], vastii力[d: 1.3;95% CI: -27.7 ~ -0.9.5 N·kg-1]。此外,我们观察到更大的髋关节外展角[d: 3.8;宽位的95% CI: 12.04 ~ 16.86°]。因此,我们建议休闲训练的男性,在最大限度的后蹲训练中,以优化腹肌的肌肉力量为目标,应该考虑采取狭窄的姿势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Stance Width on Kinematics and Kinetics During Maximum Back Squats.

Abstract: Larsen, S, Zee, Md, and Tillaar, Rvd. The impact of stance width on kinematics and kinetics during maximum back squats. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): 1-9, 2025-This study compared the lower extremity peak net joint moments (NJMs) and muscle forces between wide and narrow stance widths defined as 1.7 and 0.7 acromion width in the last repetition of the concentric phase in 3 repetition maximum back squats. Twelve recreationally trained men (age:25.3 ± 2.9 years, height:179 ± 7.7 cm, body mass:82.8 ± 6.9 kg) volunteered for the study. The NJMs were estimated using inverse dynamics and individual muscle forces with static optimization. The main findings of interest were that the wide stance resulted in statistically smaller knee flexion angles (Cohen's d: 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -17.96 to -3.18°), knee extension NJMs [d: 1.45; 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.61 Nm·kg-1], and vastii forces [d: 1.3; 95% CI: -27.7 to -0.9.5 N·kg-1] compared with the narrow stance. Moreover, we observed significantly larger hip abduction angles [d: 3.8; 95% CI: 12.04 to 16.86°] for the wide stance. Hence, we suggest that recreationally trained men aiming to optimize muscle forces in the vastii muscles during maximum back squat training should consider adopting a narrow stance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
期刊最新文献
Position-Specific Differences in Speed Profiles Among National Football League Scouting Combine Participants. Examining the Influence of Season Phase, Age, and Anthropometrics on Body Composition Trends in National Basketball Association Athletes. Impedance Spectroscopy Measures of Whole and Segmental Skeletal Muscle Quantity Associated With Strength and Power in Collegiate Ice Hockey Players. Peak Lower-Extremity Power Unadjusted for Body Mass Predicts Fastball Velocity in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers. Soft Tissue Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit Revealed Detailed Musculoskeletal Factors of Baseball Players.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1