眼盲、眼痛的剜除手术成本分析。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1097/IOP.0000000000002836
Darren A Chen, Amee D Azad, Lisa Y Lin, Michael K Yoon
{"title":"眼盲、眼痛的剜除手术成本分析。","authors":"Darren A Chen, Amee D Azad, Lisa Y Lin, Michael K Yoon","doi":"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to assess the surgical costs of enucleations and eviscerations and their relation to current reimbursement rates using time-driven activity-based costing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing enucleation and evisceration surgeries with attachment of muscles (Current Procedural Terminology 65105 and 65093) for a diagnosis of blind, painful eye, from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2023, at a single, tertiary level, teaching hospital. A time-driven activity-based cost analysis for day of surgery was performed. Operative reports, perioperative times, and supply costs were extracted from the electronic medical record, and average reimbursement fees were taken from Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 5-year study span, 110 patients underwent enucleation and 52 underwent evisceration for a primary indication of blind, painful eye by 10 different surgeons. The average operating room time and surgical time for enucleation was approximately 9 minutes longer compared with evisceration (p < 0.01). Both surgeries on average resulted in a negative margin with enucleations costing on average $624 more than eviscerations. The breakeven total operating room time for enucleation and evisceration surgery was approximately 86.3 and 83.1 minutes, respectively. From the sample, approximately 79% of enucleation and 60% of evisceration surgeries resulted in a net negative margin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On average, the cost of enucleation and evisceration surgeries exceeded the reimbursement amount set by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Compared with enucleation, evisceration was more time and cost-effective by only a modest margin.</p>","PeriodicalId":19588,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cost Analysis of Enucleation and Evisceration Surgeries for Treatment of Blind, Painful Eyes.\",\"authors\":\"Darren A Chen, Amee D Azad, Lisa Y Lin, Michael K Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to assess the surgical costs of enucleations and eviscerations and their relation to current reimbursement rates using time-driven activity-based costing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing enucleation and evisceration surgeries with attachment of muscles (Current Procedural Terminology 65105 and 65093) for a diagnosis of blind, painful eye, from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2023, at a single, tertiary level, teaching hospital. A time-driven activity-based cost analysis for day of surgery was performed. Operative reports, perioperative times, and supply costs were extracted from the electronic medical record, and average reimbursement fees were taken from Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 5-year study span, 110 patients underwent enucleation and 52 underwent evisceration for a primary indication of blind, painful eye by 10 different surgeons. The average operating room time and surgical time for enucleation was approximately 9 minutes longer compared with evisceration (p < 0.01). Both surgeries on average resulted in a negative margin with enucleations costing on average $624 more than eviscerations. The breakeven total operating room time for enucleation and evisceration surgery was approximately 86.3 and 83.1 minutes, respectively. From the sample, approximately 79% of enucleation and 60% of evisceration surgeries resulted in a net negative margin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On average, the cost of enucleation and evisceration surgeries exceeded the reimbursement amount set by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Compared with enucleation, evisceration was more time and cost-effective by only a modest margin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002836\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是利用时间驱动的作业成本法评估剜出和剜出的手术费用及其与当前报销率的关系。方法:回顾性研究2019年1月1日至2023年12月31日在某单一三级教学医院进行的伴有肌肉附着的去核和内脏切除手术(现行手术术语65105和65093),诊断为失明、眼痛。对手术当天进行了时间驱动的基于活动的成本分析。手术报告、围手术期时间和供应费用从电子病历中提取,平均报销费用从医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心数据中提取。结果:在为期5年的研究中,有110名患者接受了去核手术,52名患者接受了内脏手术,主要指征是由10名不同的外科医生进行的失明,眼睛疼痛。除核的平均手术室时间和手术时间比除核多约9分钟(p < 0.01)。这两种手术的平均利润都是负的,摘除内脏比摘除内脏平均多花费624美元。去核和去内脏手术的盈亏平衡总手术室时间分别约为86.3分钟和83.1分钟。从样本中,大约79%的去核手术和60%的去内脏手术导致净负切缘。结论:平均而言,去核和去内脏手术的费用超过了医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心规定的报销金额。与去核相比,摘除内脏时间更长,成本效益也更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Cost Analysis of Enucleation and Evisceration Surgeries for Treatment of Blind, Painful Eyes.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the surgical costs of enucleations and eviscerations and their relation to current reimbursement rates using time-driven activity-based costing.

Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing enucleation and evisceration surgeries with attachment of muscles (Current Procedural Terminology 65105 and 65093) for a diagnosis of blind, painful eye, from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2023, at a single, tertiary level, teaching hospital. A time-driven activity-based cost analysis for day of surgery was performed. Operative reports, perioperative times, and supply costs were extracted from the electronic medical record, and average reimbursement fees were taken from Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services data.

Results: In the 5-year study span, 110 patients underwent enucleation and 52 underwent evisceration for a primary indication of blind, painful eye by 10 different surgeons. The average operating room time and surgical time for enucleation was approximately 9 minutes longer compared with evisceration (p < 0.01). Both surgeries on average resulted in a negative margin with enucleations costing on average $624 more than eviscerations. The breakeven total operating room time for enucleation and evisceration surgery was approximately 86.3 and 83.1 minutes, respectively. From the sample, approximately 79% of enucleation and 60% of evisceration surgeries resulted in a net negative margin.

Conclusions: On average, the cost of enucleation and evisceration surgeries exceeded the reimbursement amount set by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Compared with enucleation, evisceration was more time and cost-effective by only a modest margin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
322
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery features original articles and reviews on topics such as ptosis, eyelid reconstruction, orbital diagnosis and surgery, lacrimal problems, and eyelid malposition. Update reports on diagnostic techniques, surgical equipment and instrumentation, and medical therapies are included, as well as detailed analyses of recent research findings and their clinical applications.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Kinetic, Automated, Tangent Screen, and Novel Disposable Perimetry for the Evaluation of Dermatochalasis and Blepharoptosis. Immediate Stentless Lacrimal Sac to Conjunctiva Reconstructive Ostomy for Cancer and Trauma Defects: LACROS (Conjunctivodacryocystostomy). Lacrimal Sac CLL: A Review of Clinical Features, Investigations, and Management. Multicentric Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of Bilateral Eyelids. Orbital and Ocular Venous Congestion: A Rare Manifestation of Hypervascular Paget Disease of the Bone.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1