同理心与宽恕的关系:复制与扩展(McCullough et al. 1997)研究报告1。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognition & Emotion Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1080/02699931.2024.2434156
Chi Fung Chan, Gilad Feldman
{"title":"同理心与宽恕的关系:复制与扩展(McCullough et al. 1997)研究报告1。","authors":"Chi Fung Chan, Gilad Feldman","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2024.2434156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>McCullough et al. [McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal Forgiving in Close Relationships. <i>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</i>, 73(2), 321-336.] demonstrated that in situations of feeling hurt by an offender, empathy towards the offender is positively associated with forgiving the offender, which in turn is positively associated with conciliatory behaviour and negatively associated with avoidance behaviour. In a Replication Registered Report with a Prolific US online sample (<i>N</i> = 794), we conducted a replication of Study 1 from McCullough et al. (1997) with extensions manipulating empathy to determine causality and measuring revenge motivation adopted from McCullough et al. [McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical Elaboration and Measurement. <i>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</i>, <i>75</i>(6), 1586-1603]. We found that empathy was positively associated with perceived apology (<i>r </i>= 0.45[0.35,0.55]) and forgiveness toward the offender (<i>r </i>= 0.64[0.56,0.70]), and forgiveness was positively associated with conciliatory motivation (<i>r </i>= 0.51[0.41,0.59]) and negatively associated with avoidance motivation (<i>r </i>= -0.51[-0.59,-0.42]) and revenge motivation (<i>r </i>= -0.43[-0.52,-0.33]). Manipulating empathy, we found that participants who recalled situations in which they felt strong empathy towards the offender rated higher forgiveness compared to participants recalling situations with low empathy or compared to control (<i>d </i>= 0.60-0.62). Overall, this was a successful replication of the findings by McCullough et al. (1997; 1998) with the empathy model of forgiveness receiving strong empirical support. Materials, data and code are available on: https://osf.io/fmuv2/. This Registered Report has been endorsed by <i>Peer Community in Registered Reports</i>: https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.rr.100444.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The link between Empathy and Forgiveness: Replication and extensions Registered Report of McCullough et al. (1997)'s Study 1.\",\"authors\":\"Chi Fung Chan, Gilad Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699931.2024.2434156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>McCullough et al. [McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal Forgiving in Close Relationships. <i>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</i>, 73(2), 321-336.] demonstrated that in situations of feeling hurt by an offender, empathy towards the offender is positively associated with forgiving the offender, which in turn is positively associated with conciliatory behaviour and negatively associated with avoidance behaviour. In a Replication Registered Report with a Prolific US online sample (<i>N</i> = 794), we conducted a replication of Study 1 from McCullough et al. (1997) with extensions manipulating empathy to determine causality and measuring revenge motivation adopted from McCullough et al. [McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical Elaboration and Measurement. <i>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</i>, <i>75</i>(6), 1586-1603]. We found that empathy was positively associated with perceived apology (<i>r </i>= 0.45[0.35,0.55]) and forgiveness toward the offender (<i>r </i>= 0.64[0.56,0.70]), and forgiveness was positively associated with conciliatory motivation (<i>r </i>= 0.51[0.41,0.59]) and negatively associated with avoidance motivation (<i>r </i>= -0.51[-0.59,-0.42]) and revenge motivation (<i>r </i>= -0.43[-0.52,-0.33]). Manipulating empathy, we found that participants who recalled situations in which they felt strong empathy towards the offender rated higher forgiveness compared to participants recalling situations with low empathy or compared to control (<i>d </i>= 0.60-0.62). Overall, this was a successful replication of the findings by McCullough et al. (1997; 1998) with the empathy model of forgiveness receiving strong empirical support. Materials, data and code are available on: https://osf.io/fmuv2/. This Registered Report has been endorsed by <i>Peer Community in Registered Reports</i>: https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.rr.100444.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition & Emotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition & Emotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2434156\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition & Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2434156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

麦卡洛等人[McCullough, m.e., Worthington, e.l., & Rachal, k.c.(1997)]。亲密关系中的人际宽恕。心理科学学报,23(2),391 - 391。研究表明,在被冒犯者伤害的情况下,对冒犯者的同理心与原谅冒犯者呈正相关,而原谅冒犯者又与和解行为呈正相关,与回避行为负相关。在一份美国大量在线样本(N = 794)的复制注册报告中,我们复制了McCullough等人(1997)的研究1,并采用McCullough等人(McCullough, m.e., Rachal, K. C, Sandage, S. J, Worthington, E. L, Brown, S. W., and ight, T. L.(1998)的扩展操作共情来确定因果关系并测量报复动机。亲密关系中的人际宽恕:2。理论阐述与测量。心理科学学报,30(6),344 - 344。研究发现,共情与道歉知觉(r = 0.45[0.35,0.55])和宽恕知觉(r = 0.64[0.56,0.70])正相关,宽恕知觉与和解动机(r = 0.51[0.41,0.59])正相关,与回避动机(r = -0.51[-0.59,-0.42])和报复动机(r = -0.43[-0.52,-0.33])负相关。通过操纵同理心,我们发现回忆对冒犯者有强烈同理心情境的参与者比回忆同理心较低情境或对照情境的参与者对宽恕的评价更高(d = 0.60-0.62)。总的来说,这是对McCullough等人(1997;1998),宽恕的共情模型得到了强有力的实证支持。材料、数据和代码可在https://osf.io/fmuv2/上获得。本注册报告已在注册报告中得到同行社区的认可:https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.rr.100444。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The link between Empathy and Forgiveness: Replication and extensions Registered Report of McCullough et al. (1997)'s Study 1.

McCullough et al. [McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal Forgiving in Close Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 321-336.] demonstrated that in situations of feeling hurt by an offender, empathy towards the offender is positively associated with forgiving the offender, which in turn is positively associated with conciliatory behaviour and negatively associated with avoidance behaviour. In a Replication Registered Report with a Prolific US online sample (N = 794), we conducted a replication of Study 1 from McCullough et al. (1997) with extensions manipulating empathy to determine causality and measuring revenge motivation adopted from McCullough et al. [McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical Elaboration and Measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1586-1603]. We found that empathy was positively associated with perceived apology (r = 0.45[0.35,0.55]) and forgiveness toward the offender (r = 0.64[0.56,0.70]), and forgiveness was positively associated with conciliatory motivation (r = 0.51[0.41,0.59]) and negatively associated with avoidance motivation (r = -0.51[-0.59,-0.42]) and revenge motivation (r = -0.43[-0.52,-0.33]). Manipulating empathy, we found that participants who recalled situations in which they felt strong empathy towards the offender rated higher forgiveness compared to participants recalling situations with low empathy or compared to control (d = 0.60-0.62). Overall, this was a successful replication of the findings by McCullough et al. (1997; 1998) with the empathy model of forgiveness receiving strong empirical support. Materials, data and code are available on: https://osf.io/fmuv2/. This Registered Report has been endorsed by Peer Community in Registered Reports: https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.rr.100444.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition & Emotion
Cognition & Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Cognition & Emotion is devoted to the study of emotion, especially to those aspects of emotion related to cognitive processes. The journal aims to bring together work on emotion undertaken by researchers in cognitive, social, clinical, and developmental psychology, neuropsychology, and cognitive science. Examples of topics appropriate for the journal include the role of cognitive processes in emotion elicitation, regulation, and expression; the impact of emotion on attention, memory, learning, motivation, judgements, and decisions.
期刊最新文献
Emotion malleability beliefs prompt cognitive reappraisal: evidence from an online longitudinal intervention for adolescents. Dissociating the roles of episodic retrieval and contingency awareness in valence contingency learning. For better or for worse: differential effects of the emotional valence of words on children's recall. Metacognitive confidence and affect - two sides of the same coin? From "isolation" to "me-time": linguistic shifts enhance solitary experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1