[基于倾向评分匹配的四川省632,825例妊娠中期血清学筛查假阳性率相关因素研究]。

Zhiling Wu, Min Ou, Mengling Ye, Guangming Deng, Yi Deng, Xueyan Wang
{"title":"[基于倾向评分匹配的四川省632,825例妊娠中期血清学筛查假阳性率相关因素研究]。","authors":"Zhiling Wu, Min Ou, Mengling Ye, Guangming Deng, Yi Deng, Xueyan Wang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20240701-00362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To retrospectively analyze the results of second-trimester serological prenatal screening and explore the factors which may influence the false-positive rate (FPR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2013 to December 2022, false-positive samples with follow-up outcomes from 632,825 second-trimester serological prenatal screening samples tested at Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital were selected as the study group, while true-negative samples were 1 : 1 matched as the control group by propensity-score matching (PSM). Univariate and binary logistic regression models were used to analyze the influencing factors. This study was approved by the Medical Ethic Committee of Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital (Ethic No. 20240607-270).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study and control groups were each matched with 305,998 cases. Univariate analysis showed that sampling season, the difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks calculated by last menstrual period (LMP), monthly median multiple of the median (mMoM) of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and monthly mMoM of free β -human chorionic gonadotropin (free β -hCG) were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that Winter (OR = 0.938; 95%CI: 0.893 ~ 0.985), monthly AFP mMoM ≥ 1.11 (OR = 0.846; 95%CI: 0.761 ~ 0.941), monthly free β -hCG mMoM ≥ 0.89 (OR = 0.827; 95%CI: 0.737 ~ 0.929) are protective factors for FPR increase, whilst Spring (OR = 1.124; 95%CI: 1.072 ~ 1.179), Summer (OR = 1.121; 95%CI: 1.062 ~ 1.183), the difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks calculated by LMP of 8 ~ 14 days (OR = 1.319; 95%CI: 1.241 ~ 1.402), < 14 days (OR = 1.689; 95%CI: 1.542 ~ 1.850), monthly AFP mMoM of 0.90 ~ 0.94 (OR = 1.088; 95%CI: 1.046 ~ 1.131), and monthly free β -hCG mMoM of 1.05 ~ 1.10 (OR = 1.046; 95%CI: 1.000 ~ 1.094), ≥ 1.11 (OR = 1.062; 95%CI: 1.002 ~ 1.126) are risk factors for FPR increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sampling season, difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks by LMP, monthly AFP mMoM, and monthly free β -hCG mMoM are risk factors for FPR during serological prenatal screening. Screening laboratories should look for the cause of abnormal FPR through such factors and adjust them accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":39319,"journal":{"name":"中华医学遗传学杂志","volume":"41 12","pages":"1432-1440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Study of factors associated with the false-positive rate of second-trimester serological screening in 632,825 cases in Sichuan based on propensity score matching].\",\"authors\":\"Zhiling Wu, Min Ou, Mengling Ye, Guangming Deng, Yi Deng, Xueyan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20240701-00362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To retrospectively analyze the results of second-trimester serological prenatal screening and explore the factors which may influence the false-positive rate (FPR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2013 to December 2022, false-positive samples with follow-up outcomes from 632,825 second-trimester serological prenatal screening samples tested at Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital were selected as the study group, while true-negative samples were 1 : 1 matched as the control group by propensity-score matching (PSM). Univariate and binary logistic regression models were used to analyze the influencing factors. This study was approved by the Medical Ethic Committee of Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital (Ethic No. 20240607-270).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study and control groups were each matched with 305,998 cases. Univariate analysis showed that sampling season, the difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks calculated by last menstrual period (LMP), monthly median multiple of the median (mMoM) of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and monthly mMoM of free β -human chorionic gonadotropin (free β -hCG) were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that Winter (OR = 0.938; 95%CI: 0.893 ~ 0.985), monthly AFP mMoM ≥ 1.11 (OR = 0.846; 95%CI: 0.761 ~ 0.941), monthly free β -hCG mMoM ≥ 0.89 (OR = 0.827; 95%CI: 0.737 ~ 0.929) are protective factors for FPR increase, whilst Spring (OR = 1.124; 95%CI: 1.072 ~ 1.179), Summer (OR = 1.121; 95%CI: 1.062 ~ 1.183), the difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks calculated by LMP of 8 ~ 14 days (OR = 1.319; 95%CI: 1.241 ~ 1.402), < 14 days (OR = 1.689; 95%CI: 1.542 ~ 1.850), monthly AFP mMoM of 0.90 ~ 0.94 (OR = 1.088; 95%CI: 1.046 ~ 1.131), and monthly free β -hCG mMoM of 1.05 ~ 1.10 (OR = 1.046; 95%CI: 1.000 ~ 1.094), ≥ 1.11 (OR = 1.062; 95%CI: 1.002 ~ 1.126) are risk factors for FPR increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sampling season, difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks by LMP, monthly AFP mMoM, and monthly free β -hCG mMoM are risk factors for FPR during serological prenatal screening. Screening laboratories should look for the cause of abnormal FPR through such factors and adjust them accordingly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华医学遗传学杂志\",\"volume\":\"41 12\",\"pages\":\"1432-1440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华医学遗传学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20240701-00362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学遗传学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20240701-00362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:回顾性分析妊娠中期血清学产前筛查结果,探讨影响假阳性率的因素。方法:选取2013年1月至2022年12月在四川省妇幼保健院检测的632,825例中期妊娠血清学产前筛查样本中具有随访结果的假阳性样本为研究组,采用倾向-得分匹配(PSM)法将真阴性样本1:1配对为对照组。采用单因素logistic回归模型和二元logistic回归模型分析影响因素。本研究经四川省妇幼保健院医学伦理委员会批准(伦理号:20240607-270)。结果:研究组与对照组各匹配305,998例。单因素分析显示,取样季节、超声与末次月经(LMP)计算妊娠周数的差异、甲胎蛋白(AFP)月中位倍数(mMoM)、游离β -人绒毛膜促性腺激素(游离β -hCG)月中位倍数(mMoM)在两组间差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。二元logistic回归分析显示Winter (OR = 0.938;95%CI: 0.893 ~ 0.985),月AFP mMoM≥1.11 (OR = 0.846;95%CI: 0.761 ~ 0.941),每月游离β -hCG mMoM≥0.89 (OR = 0.827;95%CI: 0.737 ~ 0.929)是FPR增加的保护性因素,而Spring (OR = 1.124;95%CI: 1.072 ~ 1.179), Summer (OR = 1.121;95%CI: 1.062 ~ 1.183),超声与LMP计算的胎周差8 ~ 14天(OR = 1.319;95%CI: 1.241 ~ 1.402), < 14天(OR = 1.689;95%CI: 1.542 ~ 1.850),月AFP mMoM为0.90 ~ 0.94 (OR = 1.088;95%CI: 1.046 ~ 1.131),每月游离β -hCG mMoM为1.05 ~ 1.10 (OR = 1.046;95%ci: 1.000 ~ 1.094),≥1.11 (or = 1.062;95%CI: 1.002 ~ 1.126)为FPR升高的危险因素。结论:血清学产前筛查中,取样季节、超声与LMP孕周的差异、每月AFP mMoM、每月游离β -hCG mMoM是FPR发生的危险因素。筛选实验室应通过这些因素寻找FPR异常的原因,并进行相应的调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Study of factors associated with the false-positive rate of second-trimester serological screening in 632,825 cases in Sichuan based on propensity score matching].

Objective: To retrospectively analyze the results of second-trimester serological prenatal screening and explore the factors which may influence the false-positive rate (FPR).

Methods: From January 2013 to December 2022, false-positive samples with follow-up outcomes from 632,825 second-trimester serological prenatal screening samples tested at Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital were selected as the study group, while true-negative samples were 1 : 1 matched as the control group by propensity-score matching (PSM). Univariate and binary logistic regression models were used to analyze the influencing factors. This study was approved by the Medical Ethic Committee of Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital (Ethic No. 20240607-270).

Results: The study and control groups were each matched with 305,998 cases. Univariate analysis showed that sampling season, the difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks calculated by last menstrual period (LMP), monthly median multiple of the median (mMoM) of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and monthly mMoM of free β -human chorionic gonadotropin (free β -hCG) were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that Winter (OR = 0.938; 95%CI: 0.893 ~ 0.985), monthly AFP mMoM ≥ 1.11 (OR = 0.846; 95%CI: 0.761 ~ 0.941), monthly free β -hCG mMoM ≥ 0.89 (OR = 0.827; 95%CI: 0.737 ~ 0.929) are protective factors for FPR increase, whilst Spring (OR = 1.124; 95%CI: 1.072 ~ 1.179), Summer (OR = 1.121; 95%CI: 1.062 ~ 1.183), the difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks calculated by LMP of 8 ~ 14 days (OR = 1.319; 95%CI: 1.241 ~ 1.402), < 14 days (OR = 1.689; 95%CI: 1.542 ~ 1.850), monthly AFP mMoM of 0.90 ~ 0.94 (OR = 1.088; 95%CI: 1.046 ~ 1.131), and monthly free β -hCG mMoM of 1.05 ~ 1.10 (OR = 1.046; 95%CI: 1.000 ~ 1.094), ≥ 1.11 (OR = 1.062; 95%CI: 1.002 ~ 1.126) are risk factors for FPR increase.

Conclusion: Sampling season, difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks by LMP, monthly AFP mMoM, and monthly free β -hCG mMoM are risk factors for FPR during serological prenatal screening. Screening laboratories should look for the cause of abnormal FPR through such factors and adjust them accordingly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华医学遗传学杂志
中华医学遗传学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9521
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics is a medical journal, founded in 1984, under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association (hosted by Sichuan University), and is now a monthly magazine, which attaches importance to academic orientation, adheres to the scientific, scholarly, advanced, and innovative, and has a certain degree of influence in the industry. Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics is a journal of Peking University, and is now included in Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Source Journals of Chinese Science Citation Database (with extended version), Statistical Source Journals (China Science and Technology Dissertation Outstanding Journals), Zhi.com (in Chinese), Wipu (in Chinese), Wanfang (in Chinese), CA Chemical Abstracts (U.S.), JST (Japan Science and Technology Science and Technology), and JST (Japan Science and Technology Science and Technology Research Center). ), JST (Japan Science and Technology Agency), Pж (AJ) Abstracts Journal (Russia), Copernicus Index (Poland), Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, Abstracts and Citation Database, Abstracts Magazine, Medical Abstracts, and so on.
期刊最新文献
[Clinical and genetic characteristics analysis of two children with comorbidity of two rare genetic diseases]. [Genetic analysis of a child with Leukoencephalopathy with ataxia caused by a homozygous variant of CLCN2 gene and a literature review]. [Clinical and genetic analysis of a child with Lamb-Shaffer syndrome due to a de novo variant of SOX5 gene]. [Clinical significance of trisomy 7 signaled by non-invasive prenatal testing and a literature review]. [Expert consensus on the standardized application of whole exome sequencing technology in diagnosis of genetic disorders].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1