Zhiling Wu, Min Ou, Mengling Ye, Guangming Deng, Yi Deng, Xueyan Wang
{"title":"[基于倾向评分匹配的四川省632,825例妊娠中期血清学筛查假阳性率相关因素研究]。","authors":"Zhiling Wu, Min Ou, Mengling Ye, Guangming Deng, Yi Deng, Xueyan Wang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20240701-00362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To retrospectively analyze the results of second-trimester serological prenatal screening and explore the factors which may influence the false-positive rate (FPR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2013 to December 2022, false-positive samples with follow-up outcomes from 632,825 second-trimester serological prenatal screening samples tested at Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital were selected as the study group, while true-negative samples were 1 : 1 matched as the control group by propensity-score matching (PSM). Univariate and binary logistic regression models were used to analyze the influencing factors. This study was approved by the Medical Ethic Committee of Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital (Ethic No. 20240607-270).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study and control groups were each matched with 305,998 cases. Univariate analysis showed that sampling season, the difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks calculated by last menstrual period (LMP), monthly median multiple of the median (mMoM) of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and monthly mMoM of free β -human chorionic gonadotropin (free β -hCG) were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that Winter (OR = 0.938; 95%CI: 0.893 ~ 0.985), monthly AFP mMoM ≥ 1.11 (OR = 0.846; 95%CI: 0.761 ~ 0.941), monthly free β -hCG mMoM ≥ 0.89 (OR = 0.827; 95%CI: 0.737 ~ 0.929) are protective factors for FPR increase, whilst Spring (OR = 1.124; 95%CI: 1.072 ~ 1.179), Summer (OR = 1.121; 95%CI: 1.062 ~ 1.183), the difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks calculated by LMP of 8 ~ 14 days (OR = 1.319; 95%CI: 1.241 ~ 1.402), < 14 days (OR = 1.689; 95%CI: 1.542 ~ 1.850), monthly AFP mMoM of 0.90 ~ 0.94 (OR = 1.088; 95%CI: 1.046 ~ 1.131), and monthly free β -hCG mMoM of 1.05 ~ 1.10 (OR = 1.046; 95%CI: 1.000 ~ 1.094), ≥ 1.11 (OR = 1.062; 95%CI: 1.002 ~ 1.126) are risk factors for FPR increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sampling season, difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks by LMP, monthly AFP mMoM, and monthly free β -hCG mMoM are risk factors for FPR during serological prenatal screening. Screening laboratories should look for the cause of abnormal FPR through such factors and adjust them accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":39319,"journal":{"name":"中华医学遗传学杂志","volume":"41 12","pages":"1432-1440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Study of factors associated with the false-positive rate of second-trimester serological screening in 632,825 cases in Sichuan based on propensity score matching].\",\"authors\":\"Zhiling Wu, Min Ou, Mengling Ye, Guangming Deng, Yi Deng, Xueyan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20240701-00362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To retrospectively analyze the results of second-trimester serological prenatal screening and explore the factors which may influence the false-positive rate (FPR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2013 to December 2022, false-positive samples with follow-up outcomes from 632,825 second-trimester serological prenatal screening samples tested at Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital were selected as the study group, while true-negative samples were 1 : 1 matched as the control group by propensity-score matching (PSM). Univariate and binary logistic regression models were used to analyze the influencing factors. This study was approved by the Medical Ethic Committee of Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital (Ethic No. 20240607-270).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study and control groups were each matched with 305,998 cases. Univariate analysis showed that sampling season, the difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks calculated by last menstrual period (LMP), monthly median multiple of the median (mMoM) of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and monthly mMoM of free β -human chorionic gonadotropin (free β -hCG) were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that Winter (OR = 0.938; 95%CI: 0.893 ~ 0.985), monthly AFP mMoM ≥ 1.11 (OR = 0.846; 95%CI: 0.761 ~ 0.941), monthly free β -hCG mMoM ≥ 0.89 (OR = 0.827; 95%CI: 0.737 ~ 0.929) are protective factors for FPR increase, whilst Spring (OR = 1.124; 95%CI: 1.072 ~ 1.179), Summer (OR = 1.121; 95%CI: 1.062 ~ 1.183), the difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks calculated by LMP of 8 ~ 14 days (OR = 1.319; 95%CI: 1.241 ~ 1.402), < 14 days (OR = 1.689; 95%CI: 1.542 ~ 1.850), monthly AFP mMoM of 0.90 ~ 0.94 (OR = 1.088; 95%CI: 1.046 ~ 1.131), and monthly free β -hCG mMoM of 1.05 ~ 1.10 (OR = 1.046; 95%CI: 1.000 ~ 1.094), ≥ 1.11 (OR = 1.062; 95%CI: 1.002 ~ 1.126) are risk factors for FPR increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sampling season, difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks by LMP, monthly AFP mMoM, and monthly free β -hCG mMoM are risk factors for FPR during serological prenatal screening. Screening laboratories should look for the cause of abnormal FPR through such factors and adjust them accordingly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华医学遗传学杂志\",\"volume\":\"41 12\",\"pages\":\"1432-1440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华医学遗传学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20240701-00362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学遗传学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20240701-00362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Study of factors associated with the false-positive rate of second-trimester serological screening in 632,825 cases in Sichuan based on propensity score matching].
Objective: To retrospectively analyze the results of second-trimester serological prenatal screening and explore the factors which may influence the false-positive rate (FPR).
Methods: From January 2013 to December 2022, false-positive samples with follow-up outcomes from 632,825 second-trimester serological prenatal screening samples tested at Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital were selected as the study group, while true-negative samples were 1 : 1 matched as the control group by propensity-score matching (PSM). Univariate and binary logistic regression models were used to analyze the influencing factors. This study was approved by the Medical Ethic Committee of Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital (Ethic No. 20240607-270).
Results: The study and control groups were each matched with 305,998 cases. Univariate analysis showed that sampling season, the difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks calculated by last menstrual period (LMP), monthly median multiple of the median (mMoM) of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and monthly mMoM of free β -human chorionic gonadotropin (free β -hCG) were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that Winter (OR = 0.938; 95%CI: 0.893 ~ 0.985), monthly AFP mMoM ≥ 1.11 (OR = 0.846; 95%CI: 0.761 ~ 0.941), monthly free β -hCG mMoM ≥ 0.89 (OR = 0.827; 95%CI: 0.737 ~ 0.929) are protective factors for FPR increase, whilst Spring (OR = 1.124; 95%CI: 1.072 ~ 1.179), Summer (OR = 1.121; 95%CI: 1.062 ~ 1.183), the difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks calculated by LMP of 8 ~ 14 days (OR = 1.319; 95%CI: 1.241 ~ 1.402), < 14 days (OR = 1.689; 95%CI: 1.542 ~ 1.850), monthly AFP mMoM of 0.90 ~ 0.94 (OR = 1.088; 95%CI: 1.046 ~ 1.131), and monthly free β -hCG mMoM of 1.05 ~ 1.10 (OR = 1.046; 95%CI: 1.000 ~ 1.094), ≥ 1.11 (OR = 1.062; 95%CI: 1.002 ~ 1.126) are risk factors for FPR increase.
Conclusion: Sampling season, difference between ultrasound and gestational weeks by LMP, monthly AFP mMoM, and monthly free β -hCG mMoM are risk factors for FPR during serological prenatal screening. Screening laboratories should look for the cause of abnormal FPR through such factors and adjust them accordingly.
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics is a medical journal, founded in 1984, under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association (hosted by Sichuan University), and is now a monthly magazine, which attaches importance to academic orientation, adheres to the scientific, scholarly, advanced, and innovative, and has a certain degree of influence in the industry.
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics is a journal of Peking University, and is now included in Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Source Journals of Chinese Science Citation Database (with extended version), Statistical Source Journals (China Science and Technology Dissertation Outstanding Journals), Zhi.com (in Chinese), Wipu (in Chinese), Wanfang (in Chinese), CA Chemical Abstracts (U.S.), JST (Japan Science and Technology Science and Technology), and JST (Japan Science and Technology Science and Technology Research Center). ), JST (Japan Science and Technology Agency), Pж (AJ) Abstracts Journal (Russia), Copernicus Index (Poland), Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, Abstracts and Citation Database, Abstracts Magazine, Medical Abstracts, and so on.