影响未使用外周短导管的因素:无休止的争论?住院患者的横断面研究。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1177/11297298241303200
Federica Canzan, Jessica Longhini, Elisabetta Allegrini, Giulia Marini, Elisabetta Mezzalira, Giorgia Zulianello, Elisa Ambrosi
{"title":"影响未使用外周短导管的因素:无休止的争论?住院患者的横断面研究。","authors":"Federica Canzan, Jessica Longhini, Elisabetta Allegrini, Giulia Marini, Elisabetta Mezzalira, Giorgia Zulianello, Elisa Ambrosi","doi":"10.1177/11297298241303200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Concern about unused vascular access devices has increased, but data on idle short peripherally intravascular catheters in medical-surgical units is still scarce. We aimed to assess the prevalence of unused short peripheral catheters in hospitalized patients and identify risk factors and reasons that lead nurses to maintain them in situ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was performed in September 2022. Clinical observation (24h) and medical records review were assessed to collect patient demographics and catheter-related information. Nurses were asked the main reason for continuing the use of the unused catheter. The primary outcome was the prevalence of unused short peripheral catheters, which were no longer used for intravenous fluids or medications in the previous 24 h. Multivariate logistic regression has been performed to evaluate risk factors for unused catheters. The STROBE checklist was used to report our study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred and sixty-four patients were included; out of the 621 patients with at least one short peripheral catheter, one-third had at least one unused catheter. The risk of having an unused peripherally intravascular catheter was almost double when the catheter was positioned in the emergency department. Catheters of smaller calibers and in situ for fewer days were less likely to be unused. The main reasons for keeping a peripherally intravascular catheter unused in situ were clinical conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unused short peripheral catheters are still quite frequent. While specific clinical needs justified some unused short peripheral catheters, a proportion remained unexplained and potentially avoidable. Nurses and policymakers can use the findings to inform decision-making and protocols to manage peripherally inserted catheters to reduce unused short peripheral catheters and, consequently, complications and costs and improve patient safety and quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298241303200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting the unused short peripheral catheters: A neverending debate? A cross-sectional study in hospitalized patients.\",\"authors\":\"Federica Canzan, Jessica Longhini, Elisabetta Allegrini, Giulia Marini, Elisabetta Mezzalira, Giorgia Zulianello, Elisa Ambrosi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298241303200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Concern about unused vascular access devices has increased, but data on idle short peripherally intravascular catheters in medical-surgical units is still scarce. We aimed to assess the prevalence of unused short peripheral catheters in hospitalized patients and identify risk factors and reasons that lead nurses to maintain them in situ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was performed in September 2022. Clinical observation (24h) and medical records review were assessed to collect patient demographics and catheter-related information. Nurses were asked the main reason for continuing the use of the unused catheter. The primary outcome was the prevalence of unused short peripheral catheters, which were no longer used for intravenous fluids or medications in the previous 24 h. Multivariate logistic regression has been performed to evaluate risk factors for unused catheters. The STROBE checklist was used to report our study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred and sixty-four patients were included; out of the 621 patients with at least one short peripheral catheter, one-third had at least one unused catheter. The risk of having an unused peripherally intravascular catheter was almost double when the catheter was positioned in the emergency department. Catheters of smaller calibers and in situ for fewer days were less likely to be unused. The main reasons for keeping a peripherally intravascular catheter unused in situ were clinical conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unused short peripheral catheters are still quite frequent. While specific clinical needs justified some unused short peripheral catheters, a proportion remained unexplained and potentially avoidable. Nurses and policymakers can use the findings to inform decision-making and protocols to manage peripherally inserted catheters to reduce unused short peripheral catheters and, consequently, complications and costs and improve patient safety and quality of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11297298241303200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241303200\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241303200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对未使用的血管通路装置的关注有所增加,但在内科外科单位闲置的短周血管内导管的数据仍然很少。我们的目的是评估住院患者未使用的短外周导管的患病率,并确定导致护士将其保留在原位的危险因素和原因。方法:于2022年9月进行横断面观察性研究。评估临床观察(24h)和病历回顾,收集患者人口统计学和导管相关信息。护士被问及继续使用未使用导管的主要原因。主要结果是未使用的短外周导管的患病率,这些导管在过去24小时内不再用于静脉输液或药物治疗。使用多变量逻辑回归来评估未使用导管的危险因素。使用STROBE检查表报告我们的研究。结果:共纳入764例患者;在621例至少有一根短外周导管的患者中,三分之一的患者至少有一根未使用的导管。当导管放置在急诊科时,未使用的外周血管内导管的风险几乎是两倍。较小口径的导管在原位放置的时间较短,不太可能被使用。保留外周血管内导管原位未使用的主要原因是临床条件。结论:外周短导管未使用的情况仍然较多。虽然特定的临床需要证明一些未使用的短外周导管是合理的,但仍有一部分未解释,可能是可以避免的。护士和决策者可以利用这些发现为决策和方案提供信息,以管理外周置管,减少未使用的短外周置管,从而减少并发症和成本,并提高患者安全和护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors affecting the unused short peripheral catheters: A neverending debate? A cross-sectional study in hospitalized patients.

Background: Concern about unused vascular access devices has increased, but data on idle short peripherally intravascular catheters in medical-surgical units is still scarce. We aimed to assess the prevalence of unused short peripheral catheters in hospitalized patients and identify risk factors and reasons that lead nurses to maintain them in situ.

Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was performed in September 2022. Clinical observation (24h) and medical records review were assessed to collect patient demographics and catheter-related information. Nurses were asked the main reason for continuing the use of the unused catheter. The primary outcome was the prevalence of unused short peripheral catheters, which were no longer used for intravenous fluids or medications in the previous 24 h. Multivariate logistic regression has been performed to evaluate risk factors for unused catheters. The STROBE checklist was used to report our study.

Results: Seven hundred and sixty-four patients were included; out of the 621 patients with at least one short peripheral catheter, one-third had at least one unused catheter. The risk of having an unused peripherally intravascular catheter was almost double when the catheter was positioned in the emergency department. Catheters of smaller calibers and in situ for fewer days were less likely to be unused. The main reasons for keeping a peripherally intravascular catheter unused in situ were clinical conditions.

Conclusion: Unused short peripheral catheters are still quite frequent. While specific clinical needs justified some unused short peripheral catheters, a proportion remained unexplained and potentially avoidable. Nurses and policymakers can use the findings to inform decision-making and protocols to manage peripherally inserted catheters to reduce unused short peripheral catheters and, consequently, complications and costs and improve patient safety and quality of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Centrally inserted central catheter placement using a novel, handheld, image-guided, robotic device: Results of initial feasibility trial in patients. Establishing an advanced nursing vascular access programme in a children's hospital: A successful journey. Retraction: Novel electrospun polyurethane grafts for vascular access in rats. Feasibility and Safety of bedside placement of tunneled dialysis catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence. Retained foreign body in radial artery: Endovascular retrieval and salvage of a hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1