[在线调查在冠桥工作领域的发展:结果]。

J Muris
{"title":"[在线调查在冠桥工作领域的发展:结果]。","authors":"J Muris","doi":"10.5177/ntvt.2024.12.24104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the months prior to this special issue, an online survey was conducted. The focus was on the different views on tooth- and implant-supported fixed appliances. Unfortunately, this survey was only completed by 36 people, two-thirds of whom were men and one-third of whom were women. More than three-quarters of the people have been practicing for over 10 years. Although the number of participants is too low to draw conclusions, the results show that in the case of a solitary diastema, an implant is generally not seen as a last resort and is preferred over tooth-supported constructions. Of course, the clinical circumstances are always decisive in this. Nevertheless, the answers give rise to a more critical approach to this dilemma.</p>","PeriodicalId":74255,"journal":{"name":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde","volume":"131 12","pages":"521-524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Online survey Developments in the field of crown and bridge work: the results].\",\"authors\":\"J Muris\",\"doi\":\"10.5177/ntvt.2024.12.24104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the months prior to this special issue, an online survey was conducted. The focus was on the different views on tooth- and implant-supported fixed appliances. Unfortunately, this survey was only completed by 36 people, two-thirds of whom were men and one-third of whom were women. More than three-quarters of the people have been practicing for over 10 years. Although the number of participants is too low to draw conclusions, the results show that in the case of a solitary diastema, an implant is generally not seen as a last resort and is preferred over tooth-supported constructions. Of course, the clinical circumstances are always decisive in this. Nevertheless, the answers give rise to a more critical approach to this dilemma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde\",\"volume\":\"131 12\",\"pages\":\"521-524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5177/ntvt.2024.12.24104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5177/ntvt.2024.12.24104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本期特刊之前的几个月里,进行了一项在线调查。重点是对牙齿和种植体支持的固定矫治器的不同看法。不幸的是,只有36人完成了这项调查,其中三分之二是男性,三分之一是女性。超过四分之三的人已经练习了10年以上。虽然参与的人数太少,无法得出结论,但结果表明,在孤立隔膜的情况下,种植体通常不被视为最后的手段,而不是牙齿支撑的结构。当然,临床情况在这方面总是决定性的。然而,这些问题的答案引发了一种更为批判的方法来解决这一困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Online survey Developments in the field of crown and bridge work: the results].

In the months prior to this special issue, an online survey was conducted. The focus was on the different views on tooth- and implant-supported fixed appliances. Unfortunately, this survey was only completed by 36 people, two-thirds of whom were men and one-third of whom were women. More than three-quarters of the people have been practicing for over 10 years. Although the number of participants is too low to draw conclusions, the results show that in the case of a solitary diastema, an implant is generally not seen as a last resort and is preferred over tooth-supported constructions. Of course, the clinical circumstances are always decisive in this. Nevertheless, the answers give rise to a more critical approach to this dilemma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[A PhD Completed. Restoring saliva production and quality by means of olfactory stimulation and synthetic peptides]. [Fifty years of all-ceramic restorations in dentistry 1]. [Important medical-dental interactions. Medication and older people with frailty in the oral healthcare practice]. [Oral features of and treatment options for patients with ectodermal dysplasia 2]. [Silent sinus syndrome, a rare outcome of an orbital floor fracture].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1