{"title":"[在线调查在冠桥工作领域的发展:结果]。","authors":"J Muris","doi":"10.5177/ntvt.2024.12.24104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the months prior to this special issue, an online survey was conducted. The focus was on the different views on tooth- and implant-supported fixed appliances. Unfortunately, this survey was only completed by 36 people, two-thirds of whom were men and one-third of whom were women. More than three-quarters of the people have been practicing for over 10 years. Although the number of participants is too low to draw conclusions, the results show that in the case of a solitary diastema, an implant is generally not seen as a last resort and is preferred over tooth-supported constructions. Of course, the clinical circumstances are always decisive in this. Nevertheless, the answers give rise to a more critical approach to this dilemma.</p>","PeriodicalId":74255,"journal":{"name":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde","volume":"131 12","pages":"521-524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Online survey Developments in the field of crown and bridge work: the results].\",\"authors\":\"J Muris\",\"doi\":\"10.5177/ntvt.2024.12.24104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the months prior to this special issue, an online survey was conducted. The focus was on the different views on tooth- and implant-supported fixed appliances. Unfortunately, this survey was only completed by 36 people, two-thirds of whom were men and one-third of whom were women. More than three-quarters of the people have been practicing for over 10 years. Although the number of participants is too low to draw conclusions, the results show that in the case of a solitary diastema, an implant is generally not seen as a last resort and is preferred over tooth-supported constructions. Of course, the clinical circumstances are always decisive in this. Nevertheless, the answers give rise to a more critical approach to this dilemma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde\",\"volume\":\"131 12\",\"pages\":\"521-524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5177/ntvt.2024.12.24104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5177/ntvt.2024.12.24104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Online survey Developments in the field of crown and bridge work: the results].
In the months prior to this special issue, an online survey was conducted. The focus was on the different views on tooth- and implant-supported fixed appliances. Unfortunately, this survey was only completed by 36 people, two-thirds of whom were men and one-third of whom were women. More than three-quarters of the people have been practicing for over 10 years. Although the number of participants is too low to draw conclusions, the results show that in the case of a solitary diastema, an implant is generally not seen as a last resort and is preferred over tooth-supported constructions. Of course, the clinical circumstances are always decisive in this. Nevertheless, the answers give rise to a more critical approach to this dilemma.