临床医生在考虑败血症时的想法:来自马里兰大学医疗系统的一项调查结果。

Q4 Medicine Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001183
Jerry M Yang, Samuel A Tisherman, Surbhi Leekha, Angela Smedley, Blaine Kenaa, Samantha King, Connie Wu, David J Kim, Dorsey Dowling, Jonathan D Baghdadi
{"title":"临床医生在考虑败血症时的想法:来自马里兰大学医疗系统的一项调查结果。","authors":"Jerry M Yang, Samuel A Tisherman, Surbhi Leekha, Angela Smedley, Blaine Kenaa, Samantha King, Connie Wu, David J Kim, Dorsey Dowling, Jonathan D Baghdadi","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Sepsis, a leading cause of death in the hospital, is a heterogeneous syndrome without a defined or specific set of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted a survey of clinicians in practice to understand which clinical findings they tend to associate with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A survey was distributed to physicians and advanced practice providers across a multihospital health system during April 2022 and May 2022 querying likelihood of suspecting sepsis and initiating sepsis care in response to various normal and abnormal clinical findings.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Strength of association between clinical findings and suspicion of sepsis were based on median and interquartile range of complete responses. Comparisons between individual questions were performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 179 clinicians who opened the survey, 68 (38%) completed all questions, including 53 (78%) attending physicians representing six different hospitals. Twenty-nine respondents (43%) worked primarily in the ICU, and 16 (24%) worked in the emergency department. The clinical findings most strongly associated with suspicion of sepsis were hypotension, tachypnea, coagulopathy, leukocytosis, respiratory distress, and fever. The abnormal clinical findings least likely to prompt suspicion for sepsis were elevated bilirubin, elevated troponin, and abdominal examination suggesting ileus. On average, respondents were more likely to suspect sepsis with high temperature than with low temperature (p = 0.008) and with high WBC count than with low WBC count (p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians in practice tend to associate the diagnosis of sepsis with signs of severe illness, such as hypotension or respiratory distress, and systemic inflammation, such as fever and leukocytosis. Except for coagulopathy, nonspecific laboratory indicators of organ dysfunction have less influence on decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"6 12","pages":"e1183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Clinicians Think About When They Think About Sepsis: Results From a Survey Across the University of Maryland Medical System.\",\"authors\":\"Jerry M Yang, Samuel A Tisherman, Surbhi Leekha, Angela Smedley, Blaine Kenaa, Samantha King, Connie Wu, David J Kim, Dorsey Dowling, Jonathan D Baghdadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Sepsis, a leading cause of death in the hospital, is a heterogeneous syndrome without a defined or specific set of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted a survey of clinicians in practice to understand which clinical findings they tend to associate with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A survey was distributed to physicians and advanced practice providers across a multihospital health system during April 2022 and May 2022 querying likelihood of suspecting sepsis and initiating sepsis care in response to various normal and abnormal clinical findings.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Strength of association between clinical findings and suspicion of sepsis were based on median and interquartile range of complete responses. Comparisons between individual questions were performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 179 clinicians who opened the survey, 68 (38%) completed all questions, including 53 (78%) attending physicians representing six different hospitals. Twenty-nine respondents (43%) worked primarily in the ICU, and 16 (24%) worked in the emergency department. The clinical findings most strongly associated with suspicion of sepsis were hypotension, tachypnea, coagulopathy, leukocytosis, respiratory distress, and fever. The abnormal clinical findings least likely to prompt suspicion for sepsis were elevated bilirubin, elevated troponin, and abdominal examination suggesting ileus. On average, respondents were more likely to suspect sepsis with high temperature than with low temperature (p = 0.008) and with high WBC count than with low WBC count (p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians in practice tend to associate the diagnosis of sepsis with signs of severe illness, such as hypotension or respiratory distress, and systemic inflammation, such as fever and leukocytosis. Except for coagulopathy, nonspecific laboratory indicators of organ dysfunction have less influence on decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"6 12\",\"pages\":\"e1183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630952/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:败血症是医院死亡的主要原因,是一种异质性综合征,没有明确或特定的症状。目的:我们对临床医生进行了一项调查,以了解他们倾向于将哪些临床表现与败血症联系起来。设计、设置和参与者:在2022年4月和2022年5月期间,向多医院卫生系统的医生和高级实践提供者分发了一项调查,询问怀疑败血症的可能性,并根据各种正常和异常的临床表现开始败血症治疗。分析:临床表现与脓毒症怀疑之间的关联强度基于完全缓解的中位数和四分位数范围。个别问题之间的比较采用Wilcoxon秩和检验。结果:179名开启调查的临床医生中,68名(38%)完成了所有问题,其中包括53名(78%)来自6家不同医院的主治医生。29名受访者(43%)主要在ICU工作,16名受访者(24%)在急诊科工作。与怀疑脓毒症最密切相关的临床表现是低血压、呼吸急促、凝血功能障碍、白细胞增多、呼吸窘迫和发烧。胆红素升高、肌钙蛋白升高和腹部检查提示肠梗阻的异常临床表现最不可能引起脓毒症的怀疑。平均而言,应答者在高温时比低温时更容易怀疑败血症(p = 0.008),白细胞计数高时比白细胞计数低时更容易怀疑败血症(p = 0.003)。结论:临床医生在实践中倾向于将脓毒症的诊断与严重疾病的体征联系起来,如低血压或呼吸窘迫,以及全身炎症,如发烧和白细胞增多。除凝血功能障碍外,器官功能障碍的非特异性实验室指标对决策的影响较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Clinicians Think About When They Think About Sepsis: Results From a Survey Across the University of Maryland Medical System.

Importance: Sepsis, a leading cause of death in the hospital, is a heterogeneous syndrome without a defined or specific set of symptoms.

Objectives: We conducted a survey of clinicians in practice to understand which clinical findings they tend to associate with sepsis.

Design, setting, and participants: A survey was distributed to physicians and advanced practice providers across a multihospital health system during April 2022 and May 2022 querying likelihood of suspecting sepsis and initiating sepsis care in response to various normal and abnormal clinical findings.

Analysis: Strength of association between clinical findings and suspicion of sepsis were based on median and interquartile range of complete responses. Comparisons between individual questions were performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum testing.

Results: Among 179 clinicians who opened the survey, 68 (38%) completed all questions, including 53 (78%) attending physicians representing six different hospitals. Twenty-nine respondents (43%) worked primarily in the ICU, and 16 (24%) worked in the emergency department. The clinical findings most strongly associated with suspicion of sepsis were hypotension, tachypnea, coagulopathy, leukocytosis, respiratory distress, and fever. The abnormal clinical findings least likely to prompt suspicion for sepsis were elevated bilirubin, elevated troponin, and abdominal examination suggesting ileus. On average, respondents were more likely to suspect sepsis with high temperature than with low temperature (p = 0.008) and with high WBC count than with low WBC count (p = 0.003).

Conclusions: Clinicians in practice tend to associate the diagnosis of sepsis with signs of severe illness, such as hypotension or respiratory distress, and systemic inflammation, such as fever and leukocytosis. Except for coagulopathy, nonspecific laboratory indicators of organ dysfunction have less influence on decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Heterogeneity of Intermediate Care Organization Within a Single Healthcare System. Heterogeneity of Intermediate Care Organization Within a Single Healthcare System. Multidimensional 1-Year Outcomes After Intensive Care Admission for Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children. Composite Primary Outcomes Reported in Studies of Critical Care: A Scoping Review. Evaluating the Adequacy of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection As a Quality Measure: A Cross-Sectional Analysis at a Single Tertiary Care Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1