Yara Abdou, William E Barlow, Julie R Gralow, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Kathy S Albain, Daniel F Hayes, Nancy U Lin, Edith A Perez, Lori J Goldstein, Stephen K L Chia, Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind, Priya Rastogi, Emilio Alba, Suzette Delaloge, Anne F Schott, Steven Shak, Priyanka Sharma, Danika L Lew, Jieling Miao, Joseph M Unger, Debasish Tripathy, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Lajos Pusztai, Kevin Kalinsky
{"title":"随机RxPONDER试验中激素受体阳性、her2阴性、淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的种族和临床结果","authors":"Yara Abdou, William E Barlow, Julie R Gralow, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Kathy S Albain, Daniel F Hayes, Nancy U Lin, Edith A Perez, Lori J Goldstein, Stephen K L Chia, Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind, Priya Rastogi, Emilio Alba, Suzette Delaloge, Anne F Schott, Steven Shak, Priyanka Sharma, Danika L Lew, Jieling Miao, Joseph M Unger, Debasish Tripathy, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Lajos Pusztai, Kevin Kalinsky","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The phase III RxPONDER trial has impacted treatment for node-positive(1-3), hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with 21-gene recurrence score (RS) ≤ 25. We investigated how these findings apply to different racial and ethnic groups within the trial. Methods The trial randomized women to endocrine therapy (ET) or to chemotherapy plus ET. The primary clinical outcome was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) with distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) as a secondary outcome. Multivariable Cox models were used to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and survival outcomes, adjusting for clinicopathologic characteristics, RS, and treatment. Results A total of 4,048 women with self-reported race/ethnicity were included: Hispanic (15.1%), non-Hispanic Black (NHB)(6.1%), Native American/Pacific Islander (0.8%), Asian (8.0%), and non-Hispanic White (NHW)(70%). No differences in RS distribution, tumor size, or number of positive nodes were observed by race/ethnicity. Relative to NHWs, IDFS was worse for NHBs (5-year IDFS 91.6% vs 87.1%, HR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.03-1.81) and better for Asians (91.6% vs 93.9%, HR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.46-0.91). Relative to NHW, DRFS was worse for NHBs (5-year DRFS 95.8% vs 91.0%, HR = 1.65; 95% CI 1.17-2.32) and better for Asians (95.8% vs 96.7%, HR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.37-0.95). Adjusting for clinical characteristics, particularly body mass index, diminished the effect of race on outcomes. Chemotherapy treatment efficacy did not differ by race/ethnicity. Conclusions NHB women had worse clinical outcomes compared to NHWs in the RxPONDER trial despite similar RS and comparable treatment. Our study emphasizes the persistent racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes while highlighting complex interactions among contributing factors. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01272037","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Race and Clinical Outcomes in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Node-Positive Breast Cancer in the Randomized RxPONDER Trial\",\"authors\":\"Yara Abdou, William E Barlow, Julie R Gralow, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Kathy S Albain, Daniel F Hayes, Nancy U Lin, Edith A Perez, Lori J Goldstein, Stephen K L Chia, Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind, Priya Rastogi, Emilio Alba, Suzette Delaloge, Anne F Schott, Steven Shak, Priyanka Sharma, Danika L Lew, Jieling Miao, Joseph M Unger, Debasish Tripathy, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Lajos Pusztai, Kevin Kalinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnci/djae314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The phase III RxPONDER trial has impacted treatment for node-positive(1-3), hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with 21-gene recurrence score (RS) ≤ 25. We investigated how these findings apply to different racial and ethnic groups within the trial. Methods The trial randomized women to endocrine therapy (ET) or to chemotherapy plus ET. The primary clinical outcome was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) with distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) as a secondary outcome. Multivariable Cox models were used to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and survival outcomes, adjusting for clinicopathologic characteristics, RS, and treatment. Results A total of 4,048 women with self-reported race/ethnicity were included: Hispanic (15.1%), non-Hispanic Black (NHB)(6.1%), Native American/Pacific Islander (0.8%), Asian (8.0%), and non-Hispanic White (NHW)(70%). No differences in RS distribution, tumor size, or number of positive nodes were observed by race/ethnicity. Relative to NHWs, IDFS was worse for NHBs (5-year IDFS 91.6% vs 87.1%, HR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.03-1.81) and better for Asians (91.6% vs 93.9%, HR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.46-0.91). Relative to NHW, DRFS was worse for NHBs (5-year DRFS 95.8% vs 91.0%, HR = 1.65; 95% CI 1.17-2.32) and better for Asians (95.8% vs 96.7%, HR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.37-0.95). Adjusting for clinical characteristics, particularly body mass index, diminished the effect of race on outcomes. Chemotherapy treatment efficacy did not differ by race/ethnicity. Conclusions NHB women had worse clinical outcomes compared to NHWs in the RxPONDER trial despite similar RS and comparable treatment. Our study emphasizes the persistent racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes while highlighting complex interactions among contributing factors. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01272037\",\"PeriodicalId\":501635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
RxPONDER III期试验对淋巴结阳性(1-3)、激素受体阳性、her2阴性、21基因复发评分(RS)≤25的乳腺癌的治疗有影响。我们在试验中调查了这些发现如何适用于不同的种族和民族群体。方法将女性随机分为内分泌治疗组(ET)和化疗+ ET两组。主要临床结局为侵袭性无病生存期(IDFS),远端无复发生存期(DRFS)为次要结局。多变量Cox模型用于评估种族/民族与生存结果之间的关系,调整临床病理特征、RS和治疗。结果共纳入4,048名自我报告种族/民族的妇女:西班牙裔(15.1%)、非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)(6.1%)、美洲原住民/太平洋岛民(0.8%)、亚洲人(8.0%)和非西班牙裔白人(NHW)(70%)。RS分布、肿瘤大小或阳性淋巴结数量未见种族/民族差异。相对于非健康人群,非健康人群的IDFS更差(5年IDFS 91.6% vs 87.1%, HR = 1.37;95% CI 1.03-1.81),亚洲人更好(91.6% vs 93.9%, HR = 0.64;95% ci 0.46-0.91)。相对于非健康人群,非健康人群的DRFS更差(5年DRFS 95.8% vs 91.0%, HR = 1.65;95% CI 1.17-2.32),亚洲人更好(95.8% vs 96.7%, HR = 0.59;95% ci 0.37-0.95)。调整临床特征,特别是身体质量指数,减少了种族对结果的影响。化疗的疗效没有因种族而异。结论:在RxPONDER试验中,尽管RS和治疗方法相似,但与nhw相比,NHB女性的临床结果更差。我们的研究强调了乳腺癌结局中持续存在的种族差异,同时强调了影响因素之间复杂的相互作用。临床试验注册:NCT01272037
Race and Clinical Outcomes in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Node-Positive Breast Cancer in the Randomized RxPONDER Trial
Background The phase III RxPONDER trial has impacted treatment for node-positive(1-3), hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with 21-gene recurrence score (RS) ≤ 25. We investigated how these findings apply to different racial and ethnic groups within the trial. Methods The trial randomized women to endocrine therapy (ET) or to chemotherapy plus ET. The primary clinical outcome was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) with distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) as a secondary outcome. Multivariable Cox models were used to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and survival outcomes, adjusting for clinicopathologic characteristics, RS, and treatment. Results A total of 4,048 women with self-reported race/ethnicity were included: Hispanic (15.1%), non-Hispanic Black (NHB)(6.1%), Native American/Pacific Islander (0.8%), Asian (8.0%), and non-Hispanic White (NHW)(70%). No differences in RS distribution, tumor size, or number of positive nodes were observed by race/ethnicity. Relative to NHWs, IDFS was worse for NHBs (5-year IDFS 91.6% vs 87.1%, HR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.03-1.81) and better for Asians (91.6% vs 93.9%, HR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.46-0.91). Relative to NHW, DRFS was worse for NHBs (5-year DRFS 95.8% vs 91.0%, HR = 1.65; 95% CI 1.17-2.32) and better for Asians (95.8% vs 96.7%, HR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.37-0.95). Adjusting for clinical characteristics, particularly body mass index, diminished the effect of race on outcomes. Chemotherapy treatment efficacy did not differ by race/ethnicity. Conclusions NHB women had worse clinical outcomes compared to NHWs in the RxPONDER trial despite similar RS and comparable treatment. Our study emphasizes the persistent racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes while highlighting complex interactions among contributing factors. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01272037