噬菌体感染模式决定了宿主-病毒-噬菌体系统的生态和进化变化

Ana del Arco, Lutz Becks
{"title":"噬菌体感染模式决定了宿主-病毒-噬菌体系统的生态和进化变化","authors":"Ana del Arco, Lutz Becks","doi":"10.1093/ismejo/wrae237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Giant viruses can control their eukaryotic host populations, shaping the ecology and evolution of aquatic microbial communities. Understanding the impact of the viruses’ own parasites, the virophages, on the control of microbial communities remains a challenge. Most virophages have two modes of infection. They can exist as free particles coinfecting host cells together with the virus, where they replicate while inhibiting viral replication. Virophages can also integrate into the host genome, replicate through host cell division and remain dormant until the host is infected with a virus, leading to virophage reactivation and replication without inhibiting viral replication. Both infection modes (reactivation vs. coinfection) occur within host-virus-virophage communities, and their relative contributions are expected to be dynamic and context dependent. The consequences of this dynamic regime for ecological and evolutionary dynamics remain unexplored. Here, we test whether and how the relative contribution of virophage infection modes influences the ecological dynamics of an experimental host-virus-virophage system and the evolutionary responses of the virophage. We indirectly manipulated the level of virophage (Mavirus) integration into the host (Cafeteria burkhardae) in the presence of the giant Cafeteria roenbergensis virus. Communities with higher virophage integration were characterised by lower population densities and reduced fluctuations in host and virus populations, whereas virophage fluctuations were increased. The virophage evolved toward lower inhibition and higher replication, but the evolution of these traits was weaker with higher virophage integration. Our study shows that differences in the virophage infection modes contributes to the complex interplay between virophages, viruses and hosts.","PeriodicalId":516554,"journal":{"name":"The ISME Journal","volume":"119 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virophage infection mode determines ecological and evolutionary changes in a host-virus-virophage system\",\"authors\":\"Ana del Arco, Lutz Becks\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ismejo/wrae237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Giant viruses can control their eukaryotic host populations, shaping the ecology and evolution of aquatic microbial communities. Understanding the impact of the viruses’ own parasites, the virophages, on the control of microbial communities remains a challenge. Most virophages have two modes of infection. They can exist as free particles coinfecting host cells together with the virus, where they replicate while inhibiting viral replication. Virophages can also integrate into the host genome, replicate through host cell division and remain dormant until the host is infected with a virus, leading to virophage reactivation and replication without inhibiting viral replication. Both infection modes (reactivation vs. coinfection) occur within host-virus-virophage communities, and their relative contributions are expected to be dynamic and context dependent. The consequences of this dynamic regime for ecological and evolutionary dynamics remain unexplored. Here, we test whether and how the relative contribution of virophage infection modes influences the ecological dynamics of an experimental host-virus-virophage system and the evolutionary responses of the virophage. We indirectly manipulated the level of virophage (Mavirus) integration into the host (Cafeteria burkhardae) in the presence of the giant Cafeteria roenbergensis virus. Communities with higher virophage integration were characterised by lower population densities and reduced fluctuations in host and virus populations, whereas virophage fluctuations were increased. The virophage evolved toward lower inhibition and higher replication, but the evolution of these traits was weaker with higher virophage integration. Our study shows that differences in the virophage infection modes contributes to the complex interplay between virophages, viruses and hosts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The ISME Journal\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The ISME Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismejo/wrae237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The ISME Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismejo/wrae237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

巨型病毒可以控制其真核宿主种群,塑造水生微生物群落的生态和进化。了解病毒自身的寄生虫,即噬菌体对微生物群落控制的影响仍然是一个挑战。大多数噬菌体有两种感染模式。它们可以以自由粒子的形式存在,与病毒一起感染宿主细胞,在宿主细胞中进行复制,同时抑制病毒复制。病毒噬菌体也可以整合到宿主基因组中,通过宿主细胞分裂进行复制,并保持休眠状态,直到宿主被病毒感染,导致病毒噬菌体重新激活和复制,而不抑制病毒复制。这两种感染模式(再激活与共感染)都发生在宿主-病毒-噬菌体群落中,它们的相对贡献预计是动态的和依赖于环境的。这种动态制度对生态和进化动力学的影响仍未得到探索。在这里,我们测试了病毒噬菌体感染模式的相对贡献是否以及如何影响实验宿主-病毒-病毒噬菌体系统的生态动力学和病毒噬菌体的进化反应。我们在存在巨型自助龙堡病毒的情况下,间接控制了病毒噬菌体(Mavirus)融入宿主(自助burkhardae)的水平。病毒噬菌体整合程度较高的群落的特点是种群密度较低,宿主和病毒种群的波动较小,而病毒噬菌体的波动则增加。病毒噬菌体朝着低抑制和高复制的方向进化,但随着病毒噬菌体整合程度的提高,这些特征的进化较弱。我们的研究表明,不同的病毒噬菌体感染方式导致了病毒噬菌体、病毒和宿主之间复杂的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Virophage infection mode determines ecological and evolutionary changes in a host-virus-virophage system
Giant viruses can control their eukaryotic host populations, shaping the ecology and evolution of aquatic microbial communities. Understanding the impact of the viruses’ own parasites, the virophages, on the control of microbial communities remains a challenge. Most virophages have two modes of infection. They can exist as free particles coinfecting host cells together with the virus, where they replicate while inhibiting viral replication. Virophages can also integrate into the host genome, replicate through host cell division and remain dormant until the host is infected with a virus, leading to virophage reactivation and replication without inhibiting viral replication. Both infection modes (reactivation vs. coinfection) occur within host-virus-virophage communities, and their relative contributions are expected to be dynamic and context dependent. The consequences of this dynamic regime for ecological and evolutionary dynamics remain unexplored. Here, we test whether and how the relative contribution of virophage infection modes influences the ecological dynamics of an experimental host-virus-virophage system and the evolutionary responses of the virophage. We indirectly manipulated the level of virophage (Mavirus) integration into the host (Cafeteria burkhardae) in the presence of the giant Cafeteria roenbergensis virus. Communities with higher virophage integration were characterised by lower population densities and reduced fluctuations in host and virus populations, whereas virophage fluctuations were increased. The virophage evolved toward lower inhibition and higher replication, but the evolution of these traits was weaker with higher virophage integration. Our study shows that differences in the virophage infection modes contributes to the complex interplay between virophages, viruses and hosts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genetic and species rearrangements in microbial consortia impact biodegradation potential Led astray by 16S rRNA: phylogenomics reaffirms the monophyly of Methylobacterium and lack of support for Methylorubrum as a genus. Tolerance to land-use changes through natural modulations of the plant microbiome Prophage-encoded chitinase gene supports growth of its bacterial host isolated from deep-sea sediments Dispersal promotes stability and persistence of exploited yeast mutualisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1