{"title":"801脱细胞真皮基质（ADMs）在直接植入乳房重建中的应用：7年并发症的临床观察","authors":"Haim Yoel Kaplan, Roman Rysin","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emergence of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) revolutionized prepectoral breast reconstruction, allowing partial or complete implant coverage. ADM had been described to possess several important benefits; nevertheless, the literature described an increased postoperative complication rate.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to delineate H.Y.K.'s experience with ADM in direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction, and to describe complication rate and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective patient cohort that underwent primary or revisional breast reconstruction (DTI) utilizing DermaCell, from Jan 2017 to Jan 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 230 consecutive patients, 410 breasts, and 801 DermaCell sheets were evaluated. All were DTI breast reconstructions. Complication rate was described per breast. A total of 92 cases of complication occurred (22.4%). Rippling was seen in 18 breasts (4.39%), skin ischemia in 21 breasts (5.12%), hematoma in 5 (1.21%), and seroma in 9 (2.19%). Seventeen breasts experienced capsular contraction. In the nonirradiated group, capsular contracture (CC), Baker grade 3 to 4, was seen in 4 breasts (1.11%), with 9 (18%) in the irradiated group. The postoperative follow-up period was 18 months (range: 6-84 months). BREAST-Q satisfaction with the breast increased by a mean of 10.45. Satisfaction with the implant was 6.61 out of 8.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This cohort study represents the most comprehensive and up-to-date experience with DermaCell for DTI breast reconstructive surgery. The favorable complication profile suggests that DermaCell ADM offers a safe and reliable option, making it an important tool in the armamentarium of reconstructive plastic surgeon. DermaCell is an important component in prepectoral breast reconstruction, contributing to better results, an improved complication profile, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4 (therapeutic): </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"276-285"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of 801 Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADMs) in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Clinical Observation of Complication Profiles Over a 7-Year Period.\",\"authors\":\"Haim Yoel Kaplan, Roman Rysin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjae238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emergence of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) revolutionized prepectoral breast reconstruction, allowing partial or complete implant coverage. ADM had been described to possess several important benefits; nevertheless, the literature described an increased postoperative complication rate.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to delineate H.Y.K.'s experience with ADM in direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction, and to describe complication rate and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective patient cohort that underwent primary or revisional breast reconstruction (DTI) utilizing DermaCell, from Jan 2017 to Jan 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 230 consecutive patients, 410 breasts, and 801 DermaCell sheets were evaluated. All were DTI breast reconstructions. Complication rate was described per breast. A total of 92 cases of complication occurred (22.4%). Rippling was seen in 18 breasts (4.39%), skin ischemia in 21 breasts (5.12%), hematoma in 5 (1.21%), and seroma in 9 (2.19%). Seventeen breasts experienced capsular contraction. In the nonirradiated group, capsular contracture (CC), Baker grade 3 to 4, was seen in 4 breasts (1.11%), with 9 (18%) in the irradiated group. The postoperative follow-up period was 18 months (range: 6-84 months). BREAST-Q satisfaction with the breast increased by a mean of 10.45. Satisfaction with the implant was 6.61 out of 8.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This cohort study represents the most comprehensive and up-to-date experience with DermaCell for DTI breast reconstructive surgery. The favorable complication profile suggests that DermaCell ADM offers a safe and reliable option, making it an important tool in the armamentarium of reconstructive plastic surgeon. DermaCell is an important component in prepectoral breast reconstruction, contributing to better results, an improved complication profile, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4 (therapeutic): </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"276-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae238\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of 801 Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADMs) in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Clinical Observation of Complication Profiles Over a 7-Year Period.
Background: The emergence of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) revolutionized prepectoral breast reconstruction, allowing partial or complete implant coverage. ADM had been described to possess several important benefits; nevertheless, the literature described an increased postoperative complication rate.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to delineate H.Y.K.'s experience with ADM in direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction, and to describe complication rate and patient satisfaction.
Methods: This was a retrospective patient cohort that underwent primary or revisional breast reconstruction (DTI) utilizing DermaCell, from Jan 2017 to Jan 2024.
Results: A total of 230 consecutive patients, 410 breasts, and 801 DermaCell sheets were evaluated. All were DTI breast reconstructions. Complication rate was described per breast. A total of 92 cases of complication occurred (22.4%). Rippling was seen in 18 breasts (4.39%), skin ischemia in 21 breasts (5.12%), hematoma in 5 (1.21%), and seroma in 9 (2.19%). Seventeen breasts experienced capsular contraction. In the nonirradiated group, capsular contracture (CC), Baker grade 3 to 4, was seen in 4 breasts (1.11%), with 9 (18%) in the irradiated group. The postoperative follow-up period was 18 months (range: 6-84 months). BREAST-Q satisfaction with the breast increased by a mean of 10.45. Satisfaction with the implant was 6.61 out of 8.
Conclusions: This cohort study represents the most comprehensive and up-to-date experience with DermaCell for DTI breast reconstructive surgery. The favorable complication profile suggests that DermaCell ADM offers a safe and reliable option, making it an important tool in the armamentarium of reconstructive plastic surgeon. DermaCell is an important component in prepectoral breast reconstruction, contributing to better results, an improved complication profile, and patient satisfaction.
期刊介绍：
Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
