中低收入国家试点市场食品环境评估:可行性评估和经验教训。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food and Nutrition Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1177/03795721241296185
Shauna Downs, Teresa Warne, Sarah McClung, Chris Vogliano, Noni Alexander, Gina Kennedy, Selena Ahmed, Jennifer Crum
{"title":"中低收入国家试点市场食品环境评估:可行性评估和经验教训。","authors":"Shauna Downs, Teresa Warne, Sarah McClung, Chris Vogliano, Noni Alexander, Gina Kennedy, Selena Ahmed, Jennifer Crum","doi":"10.1177/03795721241296185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Food environments are rapidly changing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), leading to dietary shifts. Many gaps exist in the measurement of food environments in LMICs making it difficult to characterize the linkages between food environments and diets.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility of implementing USAID Advancing Nutrition's Market Food Environment Assessment (MFEA)-a suite of 7 non-resource intensive food environment assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented the MFEA package in 4 countries (Liberia, Honduras, Nigeria, and Timor-Leste) and assessed the feasibility of implementing the package by conducting a descriptive analysis, using both qualitative and quantitative data of enumerators' feedback collected through training evaluations, feedback forms, detailed notes from meetings, and final reports from in-country partners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, we found it feasible to implement the MFEA, some assessments being easier to implement and more practical than others. Several key themes related to the MFEA implementation were identified across the countries, including: the potential for vendors to be hesitant to engage in assessments; the importance of ascertaining buy-in from local officials; the need to shift toward electronic, rather than paper-based, data collection; difficulties in selecting markets; the time constraints of conducting some of the assessments; and the need for better alignment between the instructions, data collection, and data analysis sheets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The package of food environment assessments, with minimal additional refinement, can be used to characterize market food environments in LMIC settings to inform context-specific interventions.</p><p><p>Testing the feasibility of implementing a package of 7 assessments to measure factors influencing food access in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12394,"journal":{"name":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","volume":"45 4","pages":"125-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Piloting Market Food Environment Assessments in LMICs: A Feasibility Assessment and Lessons Learned.\",\"authors\":\"Shauna Downs, Teresa Warne, Sarah McClung, Chris Vogliano, Noni Alexander, Gina Kennedy, Selena Ahmed, Jennifer Crum\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03795721241296185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Food environments are rapidly changing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), leading to dietary shifts. Many gaps exist in the measurement of food environments in LMICs making it difficult to characterize the linkages between food environments and diets.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility of implementing USAID Advancing Nutrition's Market Food Environment Assessment (MFEA)-a suite of 7 non-resource intensive food environment assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented the MFEA package in 4 countries (Liberia, Honduras, Nigeria, and Timor-Leste) and assessed the feasibility of implementing the package by conducting a descriptive analysis, using both qualitative and quantitative data of enumerators' feedback collected through training evaluations, feedback forms, detailed notes from meetings, and final reports from in-country partners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, we found it feasible to implement the MFEA, some assessments being easier to implement and more practical than others. Several key themes related to the MFEA implementation were identified across the countries, including: the potential for vendors to be hesitant to engage in assessments; the importance of ascertaining buy-in from local officials; the need to shift toward electronic, rather than paper-based, data collection; difficulties in selecting markets; the time constraints of conducting some of the assessments; and the need for better alignment between the instructions, data collection, and data analysis sheets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The package of food environment assessments, with minimal additional refinement, can be used to characterize market food environments in LMIC settings to inform context-specific interventions.</p><p><p>Testing the feasibility of implementing a package of 7 assessments to measure factors influencing food access in low-resource settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Nutrition Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"45 4\",\"pages\":\"125-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Nutrition Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721241296185\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721241296185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低收入和中等收入国家的粮食环境正在迅速变化,导致饮食发生转变。在对中低收入国家粮食环境的测量方面存在许多差距,因此难以确定粮食环境与饮食之间的联系。目的:本研究的目的是检验实施美国国际开发署促进营养市场食品环境评估(MFEA)的可行性,MFEA是一套7个非资源密集型食品环境评估。方法:我们在4个国家(利比里亚、洪都拉斯、尼日利亚和东帝汶)实施了MFEA一揽子计划,并利用通过培训评估、反馈表格、会议详细记录和国内合作伙伴的最终报告收集的普数员反馈的定性和定量数据,通过描述性分析评估实施该计划的可行性。结果:总体而言,我们认为实施MFEA是可行的,一些评估比其他评估更容易实施和更实用。在各国确定了与MFEA实施有关的几个关键主题,包括:供应商在参与评估时犹豫不决的可能性;获得地方官员支持的重要性;需要转向电子数据收集,而不是纸质数据收集;市场选择困难;进行部分评估的时间限制;并且需要在指令、数据收集和数据分析表之间更好地对齐。结论:该食品环境评估包,经过最小限度的改进,可用于表征低收入和中等收入国家的市场食品环境,为具体情况的干预措施提供信息。测试实施一揽子7项评估的可行性,以衡量在资源匮乏环境中影响粮食获取的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Piloting Market Food Environment Assessments in LMICs: A Feasibility Assessment and Lessons Learned.

Background: Food environments are rapidly changing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), leading to dietary shifts. Many gaps exist in the measurement of food environments in LMICs making it difficult to characterize the linkages between food environments and diets.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility of implementing USAID Advancing Nutrition's Market Food Environment Assessment (MFEA)-a suite of 7 non-resource intensive food environment assessments.

Methods: We implemented the MFEA package in 4 countries (Liberia, Honduras, Nigeria, and Timor-Leste) and assessed the feasibility of implementing the package by conducting a descriptive analysis, using both qualitative and quantitative data of enumerators' feedback collected through training evaluations, feedback forms, detailed notes from meetings, and final reports from in-country partners.

Results: Overall, we found it feasible to implement the MFEA, some assessments being easier to implement and more practical than others. Several key themes related to the MFEA implementation were identified across the countries, including: the potential for vendors to be hesitant to engage in assessments; the importance of ascertaining buy-in from local officials; the need to shift toward electronic, rather than paper-based, data collection; difficulties in selecting markets; the time constraints of conducting some of the assessments; and the need for better alignment between the instructions, data collection, and data analysis sheets.

Conclusions: The package of food environment assessments, with minimal additional refinement, can be used to characterize market food environments in LMIC settings to inform context-specific interventions.

Testing the feasibility of implementing a package of 7 assessments to measure factors influencing food access in low-resource settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Nutrition Bulletin
Food and Nutrition Bulletin 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Food and Nutrition Bulletin (FNB,) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal published quarterly by the Nevin Scrimshaw International Nutrition Foundation. The Journal is one of the leading resources used by researchers, academics, nutrition policy makers and planners in over 125 countries to obtain the most current research and policy information related to nutrition in developing countries.
期刊最新文献
Linear Programming Optimization of Local Food-Based Recommendations for Undernourished Urban Poor Malaysian Children Aged 2 to 5 Years. Effect of School-Based Weekly Iron and Folic Acid Supplementation Program on the Serum Folate Status of Adolescent Girls in Sidama Region, Southern Ethiopia: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study. The Puzzle of Food Inflation: Exploring the Asymmetric Nexus Between Economic Policy Uncertainty and Food Prices in the Expanded BRICS Countries. Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Government Policies on Infant and Young Child Feeding and Food Fortification in Benin. Do We Contribute to Women's Empowerment? Insights From a Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture Project Implemented in Nong, Laos.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1