ERS/ATS全球肺功能倡议正常值,并根据z分数而不是预测的百分比对严重程度进行分类。

IF 2.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Breathe Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1183/20734735.0227-2023
Rachel Ong-Salvador, Pierantonio Laveneziana, Franciscus de Jongh
{"title":"ERS/ATS全球肺功能倡议正常值,并根据z分数而不是预测的百分比对严重程度进行分类。","authors":"Rachel Ong-Salvador, Pierantonio Laveneziana, Franciscus de Jongh","doi":"10.1183/20734735.0227-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among the most discussed issues in the field of pulmonary function testing are reference equations and standardised methods of interpreting pulmonary function test (PFT) results. The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) task force gathered information from multiple countries with diverse ethnicities to create a multi-ethnic reference formula suitable for a broad age range. Their first output was the GLI-2012 spirometry reference equations. Together with the GLI-2012 reference equations, the GLI document recommended the use of z-scores to standardise the interpretation of PFT results. Z-scores were introduced as an alternative to per cent predicted and fixed thresholds in interpreting PFTs. After more than a decade, there is still debate on which method of interpretation is better.</p>","PeriodicalId":9292,"journal":{"name":"Breathe","volume":"20 3","pages":"230227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ERS/ATS Global Lung Function Initiative normal values and classifying severity based on z-scores instead of per cent predicted.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Ong-Salvador, Pierantonio Laveneziana, Franciscus de Jongh\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/20734735.0227-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Among the most discussed issues in the field of pulmonary function testing are reference equations and standardised methods of interpreting pulmonary function test (PFT) results. The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) task force gathered information from multiple countries with diverse ethnicities to create a multi-ethnic reference formula suitable for a broad age range. Their first output was the GLI-2012 spirometry reference equations. Together with the GLI-2012 reference equations, the GLI document recommended the use of z-scores to standardise the interpretation of PFT results. Z-scores were introduced as an alternative to per cent predicted and fixed thresholds in interpreting PFTs. After more than a decade, there is still debate on which method of interpretation is better.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breathe\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"230227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629165/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breathe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.0227-2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breathe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.0227-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在肺功能测试领域讨论最多的问题是参考方程和解释肺功能测试(PFT)结果的标准化方法。全球肺功能倡议(GLI)工作组收集了来自不同种族的多个国家的信息,以创建适合广泛年龄范围的多种族参考公式。他们的第一个成果是gl -2012肺活量测定参考方程。与GLI-2012参考方程一起,GLI文件推荐使用z分数来标准化PFT结果的解释。在解释pft时,引入z分数作为预测和固定阈值的替代方案。十多年过去了,关于哪一种解释方法更好的争论仍在继续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ERS/ATS Global Lung Function Initiative normal values and classifying severity based on z-scores instead of per cent predicted.

Among the most discussed issues in the field of pulmonary function testing are reference equations and standardised methods of interpreting pulmonary function test (PFT) results. The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) task force gathered information from multiple countries with diverse ethnicities to create a multi-ethnic reference formula suitable for a broad age range. Their first output was the GLI-2012 spirometry reference equations. Together with the GLI-2012 reference equations, the GLI document recommended the use of z-scores to standardise the interpretation of PFT results. Z-scores were introduced as an alternative to per cent predicted and fixed thresholds in interpreting PFTs. After more than a decade, there is still debate on which method of interpretation is better.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breathe
Breathe RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A 69-year-old man with generalised lymphadenopathy, glandular swelling and pleural effusion. Cardiopulmonary disease. Developments in the field of respiratory nursing in Türkiye. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for adults with respiratory failure secondary to cardiorespiratory disease: evolving indications and clinical practice. From basic scientific research to the development of new drugs for pulmonary arterial hypertension: insights from activin-targeting agents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1