hinotori™手术机器人系统与da Vinci®Xi在低危子宫内膜癌单纯性子宫切除术伴前哨淋巴结活检中的手术效果比较分析

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Japanese journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1093/jjco/hyae170
Shinichi Togami, Nozomi Furuzono, Mika Fukuda, Mika Mizuno, Shintaro Yanazume, Hiroaki Kobayashi
{"title":"hinotori™手术机器人系统与da Vinci®Xi在低危子宫内膜癌单纯性子宫切除术伴前哨淋巴结活检中的手术效果比较分析","authors":"Shinichi Togami, Nozomi Furuzono, Mika Fukuda, Mika Mizuno, Shintaro Yanazume, Hiroaki Kobayashi","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyae170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of simple hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy for low-risk endometrial cancer performed using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System and the da Vinci® Xi system.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the data of 234 patients who underwent simple hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy at Kagoshima University Hospital between January 2017 and June 2024. Amongst them, 20 patients underwent surgery using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System and 214 using the da Vinci® Xi. Surgical factors, including operative time, cockpit/console time, blood loss and sentinel lymph node detection, were evaluated. Statistical analyses included chi-square and Wilcoxon tests, with significance set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median operative and cockpit/console times were comparable between the two systems. However, the time from roll-in to the start of cockpit/console surgery was significantly longer for the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System than for the da Vinci® Xi (P = 0.0039). No significant differences were observed for blood loss, length of hospital stay, or complication rates. The sentinel lymph node detection rates and number of sentinel lymph nodes resected were similar between the two systems, with metastatic sentinel lymph node rates of 6% in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simple hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy performed using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System demonstrated outcomes comparable with those using the da Vinci® Xi system, with no significant differences in key surgical factors. These results suggest that the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System is a viable alternative for minimally invasive surgery in low-risk endometrial cancer. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes between the hinotori™ surgical robot system and da Vinci® Xi for simple hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy in low-risk endometrial cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Shinichi Togami, Nozomi Furuzono, Mika Fukuda, Mika Mizuno, Shintaro Yanazume, Hiroaki Kobayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jjco/hyae170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of simple hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy for low-risk endometrial cancer performed using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System and the da Vinci® Xi system.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the data of 234 patients who underwent simple hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy at Kagoshima University Hospital between January 2017 and June 2024. Amongst them, 20 patients underwent surgery using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System and 214 using the da Vinci® Xi. Surgical factors, including operative time, cockpit/console time, blood loss and sentinel lymph node detection, were evaluated. Statistical analyses included chi-square and Wilcoxon tests, with significance set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median operative and cockpit/console times were comparable between the two systems. However, the time from roll-in to the start of cockpit/console surgery was significantly longer for the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System than for the da Vinci® Xi (P = 0.0039). No significant differences were observed for blood loss, length of hospital stay, or complication rates. The sentinel lymph node detection rates and number of sentinel lymph nodes resected were similar between the two systems, with metastatic sentinel lymph node rates of 6% in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simple hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy performed using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System demonstrated outcomes comparable with those using the da Vinci® Xi system, with no significant differences in key surgical factors. These results suggest that the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System is a viable alternative for minimally invasive surgery in low-risk endometrial cancer. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to validate these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyae170\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyae170","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较使用hinotori™手术机器人系统和da Vinci®Xi系统对低风险子宫内膜癌进行单纯子宫切除术和前哨淋巴结活检的手术结果。材料与方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2024年6月在鹿儿岛大学医院行单纯子宫切除术并前哨淋巴结活检的234例患者的资料。其中,20名患者使用hinotori™手术机器人系统进行了手术,214名患者使用了da Vinci®Xi。评估手术因素,包括手术时间、驾驶舱/控制台时间、出血量和前哨淋巴结检测。统计分析包括卡方检验和Wilcoxon检验,显著性设置为P。结果:两种系统的中位操作时间和驾驶舱/控制台时间具有可比性。然而,hinotori™手术机器人系统从滚入到驾驶舱/控制台手术开始的时间明显比da Vinci®Xi更长(P = 0.0039)。在失血量、住院时间或并发症发生率方面没有观察到显著差异。两种系统的前哨淋巴结检出率和切除的前哨淋巴结数量相似,两组的转移性前哨淋巴结率均为6%。结论:使用hinotori™手术机器人系统进行单纯子宫切除术并前哨淋巴结活检的结果与使用da Vinci®Xi系统相当,关键手术因素无显著差异。这些结果表明hinotori™手术机器人系统是低风险子宫内膜癌微创手术的可行替代方案。需要更大样本量的进一步研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes between the hinotori™ surgical robot system and da Vinci® Xi for simple hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy in low-risk endometrial cancer.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of simple hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy for low-risk endometrial cancer performed using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System and the da Vinci® Xi system.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 234 patients who underwent simple hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy at Kagoshima University Hospital between January 2017 and June 2024. Amongst them, 20 patients underwent surgery using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System and 214 using the da Vinci® Xi. Surgical factors, including operative time, cockpit/console time, blood loss and sentinel lymph node detection, were evaluated. Statistical analyses included chi-square and Wilcoxon tests, with significance set at P < 0.05.

Results: The median operative and cockpit/console times were comparable between the two systems. However, the time from roll-in to the start of cockpit/console surgery was significantly longer for the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System than for the da Vinci® Xi (P = 0.0039). No significant differences were observed for blood loss, length of hospital stay, or complication rates. The sentinel lymph node detection rates and number of sentinel lymph nodes resected were similar between the two systems, with metastatic sentinel lymph node rates of 6% in both groups.

Conclusion: Simple hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy performed using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System demonstrated outcomes comparable with those using the da Vinci® Xi system, with no significant differences in key surgical factors. These results suggest that the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System is a viable alternative for minimally invasive surgery in low-risk endometrial cancer. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to validate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
期刊最新文献
Cabozantinib for brain metastases in renal cell carcinoma: a single-institution retrospective analysis. Diagnosis, clinical characteristics, and treatment of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma. Clinicopathological background of local recurrence in high grade sarcoma of the extremity with preoperative chemotherapy: a supplementary analysis of JCOG0304. Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in radiological ground-glass opacity of non-small cell lung cancer. A randomized phase III study evaluating dexamethasone-based mouthwash to prevent chemotherapy-induced stomatitis in patients with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1