细胞培养共感染和重复感染实验表明,圈养期间的传播有助于在类包涵体病阳性的蛇中存在repreparenavirus S和L片段群。

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Journal of General Virology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1099/jgv.0.002052
Annika Lintala, Leonóra Szirovicza, Willem Sander, Eveliina Ekström, Anja Kipar, Udo Hetzel, Jussi Hepojoki
{"title":"细胞培养共感染和重复感染实验表明,圈养期间的传播有助于在类包涵体病阳性的蛇中存在repreparenavirus S和L片段群。","authors":"Annika Lintala, Leonóra Szirovicza, Willem Sander, Eveliina Ekström, Anja Kipar, Udo Hetzel, Jussi Hepojoki","doi":"10.1099/jgv.0.002052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Boid inclusion body disease (BIBD) caused by reptarenaviruses affects captive constrictor snake collections worldwide. The disease manifests by the formation of cytoplasmic inclusion bodies in various tissues. Curiously, a snake with BIBD nearly always carries a swarm of reptarenavirus small and large segments rather than a single pair, and the composition of the swarm can vary between tissues. The role of reptarenavirus coinfections in BIBD pathogenesis remains unknown, and it is unclear whether reptarenavirus infection affects the susceptibility to superinfection or to secondary infections. For mammarenaviruses, co- and/or superinfection can occur if the infecting viruses are genetically divergent enough, and we hypothesized reptarenaviruses to behave similarly. To study this hypothesis, we employed boa constrictor kidney- and brain-derived cell cultures to perform a set of co- and superinfection experiments with one hartmanivirus and five reptarenavirus isolates. While all tested viruses replicated well in the boid kidney cells, experiments on the brain-derived cells showed differences in the replication efficacy between the viruses, suggesting that reptarenaviruses could differ in their target cell spectra. The quantification of viral RNA released from infected cells as a proxy for virus replication did not reveal overt differences between mono- and coinfections. Passaging of coinfected cell cultures revealed that one of the reptarenavirus isolates requires a coinfecting reptarena- or hartmanivirus to establish a persistent infection. Superinfection experiments on persistently reptarenavirus-infected cell lines suggested some interference between genetically similar viruses. We hypothesized that such interference would be mediated by the viral Z protein (ZP) specifically locking the genetically similar viral polymerase in a catalytically inactive state. Curiously, experiments on ZP-expressing cell lines indicated ZP overexpression not to significantly affect the amount of released viral RNA. Our experiments showed very little co- or superinfection interference between genetically dissimilar reptarenaviruses, reflecting the naturally occurring reptarenavirus coinfections in snakes with BIBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15880,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Virology","volume":"105 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cell culture co- and superinfection experiments suggest that transmission during captivity contributes to the presence of reptarenavirus S and L segment swarms in boid inclusion body disease-positive snakes.\",\"authors\":\"Annika Lintala, Leonóra Szirovicza, Willem Sander, Eveliina Ekström, Anja Kipar, Udo Hetzel, Jussi Hepojoki\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/jgv.0.002052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Boid inclusion body disease (BIBD) caused by reptarenaviruses affects captive constrictor snake collections worldwide. The disease manifests by the formation of cytoplasmic inclusion bodies in various tissues. Curiously, a snake with BIBD nearly always carries a swarm of reptarenavirus small and large segments rather than a single pair, and the composition of the swarm can vary between tissues. The role of reptarenavirus coinfections in BIBD pathogenesis remains unknown, and it is unclear whether reptarenavirus infection affects the susceptibility to superinfection or to secondary infections. For mammarenaviruses, co- and/or superinfection can occur if the infecting viruses are genetically divergent enough, and we hypothesized reptarenaviruses to behave similarly. To study this hypothesis, we employed boa constrictor kidney- and brain-derived cell cultures to perform a set of co- and superinfection experiments with one hartmanivirus and five reptarenavirus isolates. While all tested viruses replicated well in the boid kidney cells, experiments on the brain-derived cells showed differences in the replication efficacy between the viruses, suggesting that reptarenaviruses could differ in their target cell spectra. The quantification of viral RNA released from infected cells as a proxy for virus replication did not reveal overt differences between mono- and coinfections. Passaging of coinfected cell cultures revealed that one of the reptarenavirus isolates requires a coinfecting reptarena- or hartmanivirus to establish a persistent infection. Superinfection experiments on persistently reptarenavirus-infected cell lines suggested some interference between genetically similar viruses. We hypothesized that such interference would be mediated by the viral Z protein (ZP) specifically locking the genetically similar viral polymerase in a catalytically inactive state. Curiously, experiments on ZP-expressing cell lines indicated ZP overexpression not to significantly affect the amount of released viral RNA. Our experiments showed very little co- or superinfection interference between genetically dissimilar reptarenaviruses, reflecting the naturally occurring reptarenavirus coinfections in snakes with BIBD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Virology\",\"volume\":\"105 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.002052\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.002052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由repreparenavirus引起的蟒蛇包涵体病(BIBD)影响着世界范围内的圈养蟒蛇。这种疾病的表现是在各种组织中形成细胞质包涵体。奇怪的是,患有BIBD的蛇几乎总是携带一大群或大或小的repreparenavirus片段,而不是一对,而且这群病毒的组成在不同的组织中可能不同。repreparenvirus合并感染在BIBD发病机制中的作用尚不清楚,也不清楚repreparenvirus感染是否影响对重复感染或继发感染的易感性。对于母沙状病毒,如果感染病毒的基因差异足够大,就会发生共感染和/或重复感染,我们假设尾沙状病毒也有类似的行为。为了研究这一假设,我们采用大蟒蛇肾脏和脑源性细胞培养,用一种哈特曼病毒和五种reptarenavirus分离物进行了一组共感染和重复感染实验。虽然所有被测试的病毒在类肾细胞中都能很好地复制,但在脑源性细胞上进行的实验显示,病毒之间的复制效率存在差异,这表明reptarenavirus在其靶细胞光谱上可能存在差异。从受感染细胞中释放的病毒RNA作为病毒复制的代理的量化并没有揭示单感染和共感染之间的明显差异。共感染细胞培养的传代表明,其中一种reptarenavirus分离株需要同时感染reptarena或hartmanivirus才能建立持续感染。对持续性复制病毒感染的细胞系进行的重复感染实验表明,基因相似的病毒之间存在一些干扰。我们假设这种干扰可能是由病毒Z蛋白(ZP)介导的,该蛋白特异性地将基因相似的病毒聚合酶锁定在催化失活状态。奇怪的是,在表达ZP的细胞系上进行的实验表明,ZP过表达对病毒RNA的释放量没有显著影响。我们的实验显示,基因不同的reptarenavirus之间的共感染或重复感染干扰非常小,反映了自然发生的reptarenvircoinfections在蛇与BIBD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cell culture co- and superinfection experiments suggest that transmission during captivity contributes to the presence of reptarenavirus S and L segment swarms in boid inclusion body disease-positive snakes.

Boid inclusion body disease (BIBD) caused by reptarenaviruses affects captive constrictor snake collections worldwide. The disease manifests by the formation of cytoplasmic inclusion bodies in various tissues. Curiously, a snake with BIBD nearly always carries a swarm of reptarenavirus small and large segments rather than a single pair, and the composition of the swarm can vary between tissues. The role of reptarenavirus coinfections in BIBD pathogenesis remains unknown, and it is unclear whether reptarenavirus infection affects the susceptibility to superinfection or to secondary infections. For mammarenaviruses, co- and/or superinfection can occur if the infecting viruses are genetically divergent enough, and we hypothesized reptarenaviruses to behave similarly. To study this hypothesis, we employed boa constrictor kidney- and brain-derived cell cultures to perform a set of co- and superinfection experiments with one hartmanivirus and five reptarenavirus isolates. While all tested viruses replicated well in the boid kidney cells, experiments on the brain-derived cells showed differences in the replication efficacy between the viruses, suggesting that reptarenaviruses could differ in their target cell spectra. The quantification of viral RNA released from infected cells as a proxy for virus replication did not reveal overt differences between mono- and coinfections. Passaging of coinfected cell cultures revealed that one of the reptarenavirus isolates requires a coinfecting reptarena- or hartmanivirus to establish a persistent infection. Superinfection experiments on persistently reptarenavirus-infected cell lines suggested some interference between genetically similar viruses. We hypothesized that such interference would be mediated by the viral Z protein (ZP) specifically locking the genetically similar viral polymerase in a catalytically inactive state. Curiously, experiments on ZP-expressing cell lines indicated ZP overexpression not to significantly affect the amount of released viral RNA. Our experiments showed very little co- or superinfection interference between genetically dissimilar reptarenaviruses, reflecting the naturally occurring reptarenavirus coinfections in snakes with BIBD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Virology
Journal of General Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
91
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY (JGV), a journal of the Society for General Microbiology (SGM), publishes high-calibre research papers with high production standards, giving the journal a worldwide reputation for excellence and attracting an eminent audience.
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Out-of-sync evolutionary patterns and mutual interplay of major and minor capsid proteins in norovirus GII.2. Targeting pseudoknots with Cas13b inhibits porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus replication. A yeast-assembled, plasmid-launched reverse genetics system for the murine coronavirus MHV-A59. An improved reverse genetics system for rotavirus vaccine strain LLR using five plasmid vectors. Single-cycle parainfluenza virus type 5 vectors for producing recombinant proteins, including a humanized anti-V5 tag antibody.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1