分级医疗:中国ESKD患者选择社区血液透析中心的因素是什么?标记离散选择实验。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S484608
Juyang Xiong, Hangjing Zhang, Huimin Ma
{"title":"分级医疗:中国ESKD患者选择社区血液透析中心的因素是什么?标记离散选择实验。","authors":"Juyang Xiong, Hangjing Zhang, Huimin Ma","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S484608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In China, secondary and tertiary hospital-based dialysis facilities had been the most prominent provider of hemodialysis treatment. Developing community hemodialysis centers was the key to constructing hierarchical hemodialysis system. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients' preferences for hemodialysis services and attract patients with stable condition to choose community hemodialysis services.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study used a labelled discrete choice experiment with ESKD patients in Wuhan, Hubei Province in China. Patients were asked to make a choice between hospital-based hemodialysis facilities and community hemodialysis centers with different attribute levels. Mixed logit model was used to measure their preferences and heterogeneity for hemodialysis services. The marginal utility was measured to predict the change of patients' choice probability of community hemodialysis centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 420 ESKD patients consented to complete the questionnaires and 408 were included in the analysis after excluding responses that did not pass the consistency test. All attributes were significantly influencing respondents' choice of hemodialysis service. Patients were more inclined to hemodialysis services with smooth and effective referral, regular doctors, 20 minutes of travel time, and home-based offline follow-up. Gender, age, income, hemodialysis year, and hemodialysis times weekly were found to influence the preferences. When the community hemodialysis service attributes gradually meet the patients' preferences, as many as 58.39% of patients will choose community hemodialysis centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A better understanding of ESKD patients' preferences for hemodialysis service is a crucial step for the future policy implementations. Although patients tended to choose hospital-based hemodialysis facilities, patients' preferences for hemodialysis institutions would reverse with the change of service attribute. Establishing a smooth and effective referral is the most important attribute to improve patients' acceptance of community hemodialysis centers. Strengthening the integration of service can facilitate hierarchical hemodialysis service system.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"18 ","pages":"2441-2454"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hierarchical Medical: What are the Factors Driving ESKD Patients to Choose Community Hemodialysis Centers in China? A Labelled Discrete Choice Experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Juyang Xiong, Hangjing Zhang, Huimin Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S484608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In China, secondary and tertiary hospital-based dialysis facilities had been the most prominent provider of hemodialysis treatment. Developing community hemodialysis centers was the key to constructing hierarchical hemodialysis system. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients' preferences for hemodialysis services and attract patients with stable condition to choose community hemodialysis services.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study used a labelled discrete choice experiment with ESKD patients in Wuhan, Hubei Province in China. Patients were asked to make a choice between hospital-based hemodialysis facilities and community hemodialysis centers with different attribute levels. Mixed logit model was used to measure their preferences and heterogeneity for hemodialysis services. The marginal utility was measured to predict the change of patients' choice probability of community hemodialysis centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 420 ESKD patients consented to complete the questionnaires and 408 were included in the analysis after excluding responses that did not pass the consistency test. All attributes were significantly influencing respondents' choice of hemodialysis service. Patients were more inclined to hemodialysis services with smooth and effective referral, regular doctors, 20 minutes of travel time, and home-based offline follow-up. Gender, age, income, hemodialysis year, and hemodialysis times weekly were found to influence the preferences. When the community hemodialysis service attributes gradually meet the patients' preferences, as many as 58.39% of patients will choose community hemodialysis centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A better understanding of ESKD patients' preferences for hemodialysis service is a crucial step for the future policy implementations. Although patients tended to choose hospital-based hemodialysis facilities, patients' preferences for hemodialysis institutions would reverse with the change of service attribute. Establishing a smooth and effective referral is the most important attribute to improve patients' acceptance of community hemodialysis centers. Strengthening the integration of service can facilitate hierarchical hemodialysis service system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2441-2454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629663/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S484608\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S484608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在中国,以医院为基础的二级和三级透析设施一直是最主要的血液透析治疗提供者。发展社区血液透析中心是构建分级血液透析体系的关键。因此,本研究旨在探讨终末期肾病(ESKD)患者对血液透析服务的偏好,吸引病情稳定的患者选择社区血液透析服务。患者和方法:该研究对中国湖北省武汉市的ESKD患者进行了标记离散选择实验。要求患者在不同属性水平的医院血透设施和社区血透中心之间做出选择。使用混合logit模型来衡量他们对血液透析服务的偏好和异质性。测量边际效用,预测患者社区血液透析中心选择概率的变化。结果:共有420名ESKD患者同意完成问卷调查,在排除未通过一致性检验的应答后,408名患者被纳入分析。所有属性都显著影响被调查者对血液透析服务的选择。患者更倾向于转诊顺畅有效、定期就诊、出行时间20分钟、在家线下随访的血液透析服务。性别、年龄、收入、血液透析年份和每周血液透析次数均影响患者的选择。当社区血液透析服务属性逐渐满足患者偏好时,高达58.39%的患者会选择社区血液透析中心。结论:更好地了解ESKD患者对血液透析服务的偏好是未来政策实施的关键一步。虽然患者倾向于选择以医院为基础的血液透析机构,但随着服务属性的改变,患者对血液透析机构的偏好会发生逆转。建立顺畅有效的转诊是提高患者对社区血液透析中心接受度的最重要因素。加强服务一体化,促进分层次血液透析服务体系的建立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hierarchical Medical: What are the Factors Driving ESKD Patients to Choose Community Hemodialysis Centers in China? A Labelled Discrete Choice Experiment.

Purpose: In China, secondary and tertiary hospital-based dialysis facilities had been the most prominent provider of hemodialysis treatment. Developing community hemodialysis centers was the key to constructing hierarchical hemodialysis system. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients' preferences for hemodialysis services and attract patients with stable condition to choose community hemodialysis services.

Patients and methods: The study used a labelled discrete choice experiment with ESKD patients in Wuhan, Hubei Province in China. Patients were asked to make a choice between hospital-based hemodialysis facilities and community hemodialysis centers with different attribute levels. Mixed logit model was used to measure their preferences and heterogeneity for hemodialysis services. The marginal utility was measured to predict the change of patients' choice probability of community hemodialysis centers.

Results: A total of 420 ESKD patients consented to complete the questionnaires and 408 were included in the analysis after excluding responses that did not pass the consistency test. All attributes were significantly influencing respondents' choice of hemodialysis service. Patients were more inclined to hemodialysis services with smooth and effective referral, regular doctors, 20 minutes of travel time, and home-based offline follow-up. Gender, age, income, hemodialysis year, and hemodialysis times weekly were found to influence the preferences. When the community hemodialysis service attributes gradually meet the patients' preferences, as many as 58.39% of patients will choose community hemodialysis centers.

Conclusion: A better understanding of ESKD patients' preferences for hemodialysis service is a crucial step for the future policy implementations. Although patients tended to choose hospital-based hemodialysis facilities, patients' preferences for hemodialysis institutions would reverse with the change of service attribute. Establishing a smooth and effective referral is the most important attribute to improve patients' acceptance of community hemodialysis centers. Strengthening the integration of service can facilitate hierarchical hemodialysis service system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
Barriers to Adherence to Standard of Care in Appalachia: A Qualitative Assessment in Gastrointestinal Cancers. Developing and Validating a Novel Generic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure - Postoperative Recovery Scale for Adult (PRSA): A Prospective Observational Study. Preferences and Attitudes Towards Digital Communication and Symptom Reporting Methods in Clinical Trials. Suitability of Measures of Pharmacy-Based Medication Adherence for Routine Clinical Use Among Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review. National Patient Satisfaction Survey as a Predictor for Quality of Care and Quality Improvement - Experience and Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1