Fanchun Zeng, Quanfu Cao, Fengwen Fu, Bin Wang, Zhongyi Sun
{"title":"生物焊接:一种快速且不流血的包皮环切术。","authors":"Fanchun Zeng, Quanfu Cao, Fengwen Fu, Bin Wang, Zhongyi Sun","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05355-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circumcision is essential for male health, yet traditional methods are plagued by issues such as lengthy operative times, bleeding, and slow recovery. This study explores the application of biological welding technology in circumcision, assessing its potential as a safe and efficient novel surgical approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 24 male adult dogs were randomly divided into two groups. The biological welding group underwent circumcision using biological welding technology, while the control group received traditional cut-and-suture circumcision. Clinical indicators such as surgical time, blood loss, pathological changes, and recovery time were observed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The biological welding group had a significantly shorter surgical time compared to the control group (2.33 ± 0.55 min vs. 27.06 ± 5.77 min, p < 0.001). The control group had an average blood loss of 22.35 ± 5.17 ml, whereas the biological welding group experienced zero blood loss (p < 0.001). Recovery time was also significantly shorter in the biological welding group (12.33 ± 3.50 d vs. 16.50 ± 2.57 d, p = 0.004), with a lower incidence of postoperative complications. Pathological analysis indicated that the thermal injury range in the biological welding group was controlled within 2 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biological welding technology demonstrated advantages in circumcision, including short surgical time, no bleeding, minimal thermal damage, and rapid recovery, proving to be a safe and effective novel circumcision technique with potential clinical application value.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biological welding: a rapid and bloodless approach to circumcision.\",\"authors\":\"Fanchun Zeng, Quanfu Cao, Fengwen Fu, Bin Wang, Zhongyi Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00345-024-05355-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circumcision is essential for male health, yet traditional methods are plagued by issues such as lengthy operative times, bleeding, and slow recovery. This study explores the application of biological welding technology in circumcision, assessing its potential as a safe and efficient novel surgical approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 24 male adult dogs were randomly divided into two groups. The biological welding group underwent circumcision using biological welding technology, while the control group received traditional cut-and-suture circumcision. Clinical indicators such as surgical time, blood loss, pathological changes, and recovery time were observed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The biological welding group had a significantly shorter surgical time compared to the control group (2.33 ± 0.55 min vs. 27.06 ± 5.77 min, p < 0.001). The control group had an average blood loss of 22.35 ± 5.17 ml, whereas the biological welding group experienced zero blood loss (p < 0.001). Recovery time was also significantly shorter in the biological welding group (12.33 ± 3.50 d vs. 16.50 ± 2.57 d, p = 0.004), with a lower incidence of postoperative complications. Pathological analysis indicated that the thermal injury range in the biological welding group was controlled within 2 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biological welding technology demonstrated advantages in circumcision, including short surgical time, no bleeding, minimal thermal damage, and rapid recovery, proving to be a safe and effective novel circumcision technique with potential clinical application value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05355-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05355-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:包皮环切术对男性健康至关重要,但传统的包皮环切术存在手术时间长、出血和恢复缓慢等问题。本研究探讨生物焊接技术在包皮环切术中的应用,评估其作为一种安全有效的新型手术方法的潜力。方法:选取雄性成年犬24只,随机分为两组。生物焊接组采用生物焊接技术行包皮环切术,对照组采用传统切割缝合包皮环切术。观察并比较手术时间、出血量、病理变化、恢复时间等临床指标。结果:生物焊接组手术时间明显短于对照组(2.33±0.55 min vs. 27.06±5.77 min)。结论:生物焊接技术在包皮环切术中具有手术时间短、无出血、热损伤小、恢复快等优点,是一种安全有效的新型包皮环切术,具有潜在的临床应用价值。
Biological welding: a rapid and bloodless approach to circumcision.
Background: Circumcision is essential for male health, yet traditional methods are plagued by issues such as lengthy operative times, bleeding, and slow recovery. This study explores the application of biological welding technology in circumcision, assessing its potential as a safe and efficient novel surgical approach.
Methods: In this study, 24 male adult dogs were randomly divided into two groups. The biological welding group underwent circumcision using biological welding technology, while the control group received traditional cut-and-suture circumcision. Clinical indicators such as surgical time, blood loss, pathological changes, and recovery time were observed and compared.
Results: The biological welding group had a significantly shorter surgical time compared to the control group (2.33 ± 0.55 min vs. 27.06 ± 5.77 min, p < 0.001). The control group had an average blood loss of 22.35 ± 5.17 ml, whereas the biological welding group experienced zero blood loss (p < 0.001). Recovery time was also significantly shorter in the biological welding group (12.33 ± 3.50 d vs. 16.50 ± 2.57 d, p = 0.004), with a lower incidence of postoperative complications. Pathological analysis indicated that the thermal injury range in the biological welding group was controlled within 2 mm.
Conclusion: Biological welding technology demonstrated advantages in circumcision, including short surgical time, no bleeding, minimal thermal damage, and rapid recovery, proving to be a safe and effective novel circumcision technique with potential clinical application value.
期刊介绍:
The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.