Julien Viau-Lapointe, Julia Kfouri, Mary Thompson, Rizwana Ashraf, Rohan D'Souza, Stephen Lapinsky
{"title":"危重产科患者研究结果报告:系统回顾","authors":"Julien Viau-Lapointe, Julia Kfouri, Mary Thompson, Rizwana Ashraf, Rohan D'Souza, Stephen Lapinsky","doi":"10.1177/1753495X241302848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review is the first step in the process of standardizing outcome reporting through the development of a core outcome set for research on critically ill obstetric patients (COSCO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A five-database search was performed to identify randomized and non-randomized studies published before November 2017, on patients admitted to intensive care or high-dependency units during or immediately after pregnancy. Reported outcomes were categorized into domains and definitions were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 12,581 citations reviewed, 136 studies were included. The most reported outcome domains were maternal all-cause mortality (<i>n</i> = 128, 94.5%), resource use (<i>n</i> = 116, 85.6%), and clinical/physiological outcomes (<i>n</i> = 111, 82.8%). Outcomes related to functioning/life impact and adverse effects of treatment were only reported in four (2.9%) studies. There was inconsistency in outcome definitions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review identified considerable variation in outcome reporting and definitions and generated an outcome list to consider in COSCO development.</p>","PeriodicalId":51717,"journal":{"name":"Obstetric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1753495X241302848"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome reporting in studies on critically ill obstetric patients: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Julien Viau-Lapointe, Julia Kfouri, Mary Thompson, Rizwana Ashraf, Rohan D'Souza, Stephen Lapinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1753495X241302848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review is the first step in the process of standardizing outcome reporting through the development of a core outcome set for research on critically ill obstetric patients (COSCO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A five-database search was performed to identify randomized and non-randomized studies published before November 2017, on patients admitted to intensive care or high-dependency units during or immediately after pregnancy. Reported outcomes were categorized into domains and definitions were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 12,581 citations reviewed, 136 studies were included. The most reported outcome domains were maternal all-cause mortality (<i>n</i> = 128, 94.5%), resource use (<i>n</i> = 116, 85.6%), and clinical/physiological outcomes (<i>n</i> = 111, 82.8%). Outcomes related to functioning/life impact and adverse effects of treatment were only reported in four (2.9%) studies. There was inconsistency in outcome definitions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review identified considerable variation in outcome reporting and definitions and generated an outcome list to consider in COSCO development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetric Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1753495X241302848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626548/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetric Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495X241302848\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495X241302848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcome reporting in studies on critically ill obstetric patients: A systematic review.
Introduction: This systematic review is the first step in the process of standardizing outcome reporting through the development of a core outcome set for research on critically ill obstetric patients (COSCO).
Methods: A five-database search was performed to identify randomized and non-randomized studies published before November 2017, on patients admitted to intensive care or high-dependency units during or immediately after pregnancy. Reported outcomes were categorized into domains and definitions were documented.
Results: Of the 12,581 citations reviewed, 136 studies were included. The most reported outcome domains were maternal all-cause mortality (n = 128, 94.5%), resource use (n = 116, 85.6%), and clinical/physiological outcomes (n = 111, 82.8%). Outcomes related to functioning/life impact and adverse effects of treatment were only reported in four (2.9%) studies. There was inconsistency in outcome definitions.
Conclusions: This review identified considerable variation in outcome reporting and definitions and generated an outcome list to consider in COSCO development.