与芭蕾和现代舞人群的功能运动屏幕相比,运动能力屏幕显示出更好的损伤预测能力:一个批判性评估的话题。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1123/jsr.2024-0194
Evyn Callahan, L Colby Mangum
{"title":"与芭蕾和现代舞人群的功能运动屏幕相比,运动能力屏幕显示出更好的损伤预测能力:一个批判性评估的话题。","authors":"Evyn Callahan, L Colby Mangum","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical scenario: </strong>Ballet dancers exhibit a high risk of musculoskeletal injuries with around 75% of all injuries attributed to overuse injuries. The high prevalence of chronic injuries suggests contributions caused by abnormal biomechanics in combination with repetitive stress common to ballet. Traditional sports settings implement movement screening tools including the Movement Competency Screen (MCS) and functional movement screen (FMS) to identify factors predisposing athletes to injury. However, unique training demands and movement patterns of ballet and contemporary pose challenges for fundamental movement screenings. Identifying relationships between movement screening scores and injury incidence in dancers may allow for early injury risk factors detection and injury prevention programs implementation to reduce overall injury rate.</p><p><strong>Clinical question: </strong>Does implementation of the MCS improve prediction of injury incidence compared with use of the FMS™ in collegiate, preprofessional, and professional ballet, and contemporary dancers?</p><p><strong>Summary of key findings: </strong>Three studies met the inclusion criteria for critical appraisal. One study utilized the MCS while the other 2 implemented the FMS™ to assess ballet and modern dancers. These studies concluded the MCS may predict injury when implemented as a preseason screening in ballet and contemporary. The FMS™ did not demonstrate predictive capability for injuries in ballet and contemporary dancers.</p><p><strong>Clinical bottom line: </strong>While the MCS shows injury prediction potential, a dance-specific movement screening more accurately representing dance-related movement patterns may improve validity in this population. Continuation and standardization of dance injury research is imperative to understand movement compensations predisposing individuals to injury and injury prevention measures.</p><p><strong>Recommendation: </strong>Grade B evidence suggests potential predictive ability of the MCS in identifying dance-related injury, while no association exists between the FMS™ and dance injuries. Additional research regarding dance-specific movement application to functional screenings shows potential for accurate and reliable injury prediction methods for ballet and modern dancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Movement Competency Screen Shows Improved Injury Predictive Ability Compared With the Functional Movement Screen in Ballet and Contemporary Dance Populations: A Critically Appraised Topic.\",\"authors\":\"Evyn Callahan, L Colby Mangum\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jsr.2024-0194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Clinical scenario: </strong>Ballet dancers exhibit a high risk of musculoskeletal injuries with around 75% of all injuries attributed to overuse injuries. The high prevalence of chronic injuries suggests contributions caused by abnormal biomechanics in combination with repetitive stress common to ballet. Traditional sports settings implement movement screening tools including the Movement Competency Screen (MCS) and functional movement screen (FMS) to identify factors predisposing athletes to injury. However, unique training demands and movement patterns of ballet and contemporary pose challenges for fundamental movement screenings. Identifying relationships between movement screening scores and injury incidence in dancers may allow for early injury risk factors detection and injury prevention programs implementation to reduce overall injury rate.</p><p><strong>Clinical question: </strong>Does implementation of the MCS improve prediction of injury incidence compared with use of the FMS™ in collegiate, preprofessional, and professional ballet, and contemporary dancers?</p><p><strong>Summary of key findings: </strong>Three studies met the inclusion criteria for critical appraisal. One study utilized the MCS while the other 2 implemented the FMS™ to assess ballet and modern dancers. These studies concluded the MCS may predict injury when implemented as a preseason screening in ballet and contemporary. The FMS™ did not demonstrate predictive capability for injuries in ballet and contemporary dancers.</p><p><strong>Clinical bottom line: </strong>While the MCS shows injury prediction potential, a dance-specific movement screening more accurately representing dance-related movement patterns may improve validity in this population. Continuation and standardization of dance injury research is imperative to understand movement compensations predisposing individuals to injury and injury prevention measures.</p><p><strong>Recommendation: </strong>Grade B evidence suggests potential predictive ability of the MCS in identifying dance-related injury, while no association exists between the FMS™ and dance injuries. Additional research regarding dance-specific movement application to functional screenings shows potential for accurate and reliable injury prediction methods for ballet and modern dancers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0194\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床情景:芭蕾舞者表现出较高的肌肉骨骼损伤风险,约75%的损伤归因于过度使用损伤。慢性损伤的高患病率表明,异常的生物力学与芭蕾常见的重复性压力相结合是造成损伤的原因。传统的运动设置采用运动筛选工具,包括运动能力筛选(MCS)和功能运动筛选(FMS),以确定运动员受伤的因素。然而,芭蕾和现代舞独特的训练要求和动作模式对基本动作筛选提出了挑战。确定舞蹈者运动筛查得分与受伤发生率之间的关系,可能有助于早期发现受伤风险因素和实施伤害预防计划,从而降低整体受伤率。临床问题:与FMS™相比,MCS的实施是否能提高对大学生、专业前、专业芭蕾舞者和现代舞者损伤发生率的预测?主要发现总结:三项研究符合关键评价的纳入标准。一项研究使用MCS,另两项研究使用FMS™来评估芭蕾舞和现代舞者。这些研究得出结论,当MCS作为季前筛查在芭蕾和现代舞中实施时,可以预测损伤。FMS™没有显示出对芭蕾和现代舞演员损伤的预测能力。临床结论:虽然MCS显示出损伤预测的潜力,但更准确地代表舞蹈相关运动模式的舞蹈特定运动筛查可能会提高这一人群的有效性。舞蹈损伤研究的持续和标准化对于了解运动补偿对个体损伤的易感性和损伤预防措施是必要的。推荐:B级证据表明MCS在识别舞蹈相关损伤方面具有潜在的预测能力,而FMS™与舞蹈损伤之间不存在关联。关于舞蹈特定动作应用于功能筛选的额外研究表明,芭蕾和现代舞者有可能使用准确可靠的损伤预测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Movement Competency Screen Shows Improved Injury Predictive Ability Compared With the Functional Movement Screen in Ballet and Contemporary Dance Populations: A Critically Appraised Topic.

Clinical scenario: Ballet dancers exhibit a high risk of musculoskeletal injuries with around 75% of all injuries attributed to overuse injuries. The high prevalence of chronic injuries suggests contributions caused by abnormal biomechanics in combination with repetitive stress common to ballet. Traditional sports settings implement movement screening tools including the Movement Competency Screen (MCS) and functional movement screen (FMS) to identify factors predisposing athletes to injury. However, unique training demands and movement patterns of ballet and contemporary pose challenges for fundamental movement screenings. Identifying relationships between movement screening scores and injury incidence in dancers may allow for early injury risk factors detection and injury prevention programs implementation to reduce overall injury rate.

Clinical question: Does implementation of the MCS improve prediction of injury incidence compared with use of the FMS™ in collegiate, preprofessional, and professional ballet, and contemporary dancers?

Summary of key findings: Three studies met the inclusion criteria for critical appraisal. One study utilized the MCS while the other 2 implemented the FMS™ to assess ballet and modern dancers. These studies concluded the MCS may predict injury when implemented as a preseason screening in ballet and contemporary. The FMS™ did not demonstrate predictive capability for injuries in ballet and contemporary dancers.

Clinical bottom line: While the MCS shows injury prediction potential, a dance-specific movement screening more accurately representing dance-related movement patterns may improve validity in this population. Continuation and standardization of dance injury research is imperative to understand movement compensations predisposing individuals to injury and injury prevention measures.

Recommendation: Grade B evidence suggests potential predictive ability of the MCS in identifying dance-related injury, while no association exists between the FMS™ and dance injuries. Additional research regarding dance-specific movement application to functional screenings shows potential for accurate and reliable injury prediction methods for ballet and modern dancers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
期刊最新文献
Successful Rehabilitation Following Stem Cell Therapy for Large Knee Osteochondritis Dissecans in an Adolescent Wrestler. Exploring New Frontiers in Concussion Rehabilitation. Normative Hip Range of Motion and Strength Profiles of Uninjured Baseball Athletes: A Systematic Review. The Effects of Different Core Stability Training on Trunk Stability and Athletic Performance in Adolescent Female Basketball Players. Influence of Step Rate Manipulation on Foot Strike Pattern and Running Economy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1