商业对患者和公众参与的影响:再次呼吁研究和行动。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Promotion International Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/heapro/daae188
Marita Hennessy, Tom Fahey, James Larkin
{"title":"商业对患者和公众参与的影响:再次呼吁研究和行动。","authors":"Marita Hennessy, Tom Fahey, James Larkin","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daae188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient and public involvement is increasingly advocated in health policy, research and practice. Patients and people with lived experience, carers and the general public should have a say in how policy is generated, how services are delivered and how research is conducted. Through this perspective article, we hope to stimulate discussion and debate around industry influence in patient and public involvement, specifically pertaining to patient organizations, which often play a key role in patient and public involvement activities. As momentum gathers around patient and public involvement in many countries, it is timely to discuss the nature and extent of commercial influences in such activities, the (un)anticipated consequences of industry-patient interactions, including conflicts of interest and motivated bias, and how we might better manage, or negate, such interactions. Patient and public involvement must be integral to research, policy and practice. While further research is needed to examine the interactions, and consequences of pharmaceutical industry interactions with patients, several practical steps can be taken in the interim. Structures, processes and supports, which are fit for purpose, are needed to ensure independence, power and legitimacy within patient and public involvement activities, and that patient advocates have their voices heard, and ultimately acted upon.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"39 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commercial influences on patient and public involvement: a renewed call for research and action.\",\"authors\":\"Marita Hennessy, Tom Fahey, James Larkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapro/daae188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patient and public involvement is increasingly advocated in health policy, research and practice. Patients and people with lived experience, carers and the general public should have a say in how policy is generated, how services are delivered and how research is conducted. Through this perspective article, we hope to stimulate discussion and debate around industry influence in patient and public involvement, specifically pertaining to patient organizations, which often play a key role in patient and public involvement activities. As momentum gathers around patient and public involvement in many countries, it is timely to discuss the nature and extent of commercial influences in such activities, the (un)anticipated consequences of industry-patient interactions, including conflicts of interest and motivated bias, and how we might better manage, or negate, such interactions. Patient and public involvement must be integral to research, policy and practice. While further research is needed to examine the interactions, and consequences of pharmaceutical industry interactions with patients, several practical steps can be taken in the interim. Structures, processes and supports, which are fit for purpose, are needed to ensure independence, power and legitimacy within patient and public involvement activities, and that patient advocates have their voices heard, and ultimately acted upon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion International\",\"volume\":\"39 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631069/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae188\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多地提倡患者和公众参与卫生政策、研究和实践。在如何制定政策、如何提供服务以及如何开展研究方面,患者和有生活经验的人、护理人员和一般公众应该有发言权。通过这篇前瞻性文章,我们希望激发有关行业对患者和公众参与的影响的讨论和辩论,特别是与患者组织有关的讨论和辩论,这些组织通常在患者和公众参与活动中发挥关键作用。随着许多国家患者和公众参与的势头日益增强,讨论此类活动中商业影响的性质和程度、行业与患者互动的(未预料到的)后果(包括利益冲突和动机性偏见)以及我们如何更好地管理或否定此类互动是及时的。患者和公众的参与必须成为研究、政策和实践的组成部分。虽然需要进一步的研究来检查相互作用,以及制药工业与患者相互作用的后果,但在此期间可以采取一些实际步骤。需要适当的结构、程序和支持,以确保患者和公众参与活动的独立性、权力和合法性,并确保患者倡导者的声音得到倾听,并最终采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Commercial influences on patient and public involvement: a renewed call for research and action.

Patient and public involvement is increasingly advocated in health policy, research and practice. Patients and people with lived experience, carers and the general public should have a say in how policy is generated, how services are delivered and how research is conducted. Through this perspective article, we hope to stimulate discussion and debate around industry influence in patient and public involvement, specifically pertaining to patient organizations, which often play a key role in patient and public involvement activities. As momentum gathers around patient and public involvement in many countries, it is timely to discuss the nature and extent of commercial influences in such activities, the (un)anticipated consequences of industry-patient interactions, including conflicts of interest and motivated bias, and how we might better manage, or negate, such interactions. Patient and public involvement must be integral to research, policy and practice. While further research is needed to examine the interactions, and consequences of pharmaceutical industry interactions with patients, several practical steps can be taken in the interim. Structures, processes and supports, which are fit for purpose, are needed to ensure independence, power and legitimacy within patient and public involvement activities, and that patient advocates have their voices heard, and ultimately acted upon.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
期刊最新文献
Developing a co-designed, culturally responsive physical activity program for Pasifika communities in Western Sydney, Australia. Enhancing young people's pregnancy loss and fertility awareness and knowledge via schools: a way forward. Association between mobility decline and health literacy in older Japanese adults: Onjuku study. Designing supports for family and friends: outcomes from an Australian lived experience of suicide workshop. Health literacy and psychological wellbeing of employees working from home in Germany-online survey results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1