助听器验配中充分效益与不足效益的考量。

Yoshihiro Nitta, Hajime Sano, Shogo Furuki, Sachie Umehara, Yuki Hara, Taku Yamashita
{"title":"助听器验配中充分效益与不足效益的考量。","authors":"Yoshihiro Nitta, Hajime Sano, Shogo Furuki, Sachie Umehara, Yuki Hara, Taku Yamashita","doi":"10.5152/iao.2024.241565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During hearing aid (HA) fitting, individuals may experience better speech discrimination at normal speech levels and worse discrimination at loud speech levels than without an HA. Therefore, we investigated factors that worsen speech discrimination when the speech sound level increases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Speech discrimination was measured in patients aged >20 years who had average hearing thresholds <90 dB on pure-tone audiometry. An insufficient benefit was defined as speech discrimination being better at 65 dB sound pressure level (SPL) with HAs than without HAs and worse at 80 dB SPL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 251 participants (296 ears), 229 and 25 had sufficient benefit and insufficient benefit, respectively. Functional gains (FGs) of sufficient benefit were approximately 1/3 gain (1/3 G) at 500 and 4000 Hz and slightly larger at 1000 and 2000 Hz. Functional gains of insufficient benefit were approximately 1/2 G at 1000 and 2000 Hz, smaller at 500 and 4000 Hz, and approximately 1/3 G at 250 Hz. Moreover, the difference between 1/2 G and FG was significantly larger in the sufficient benefit group at 250 500, and 4000 Hz than in the insufficient benefit group. Additionally, the average compression ratio at 50-80 dB SPL in the insufficient benefit group was approximately 1.1 to 1.2, slightly lower than the standard values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjusting the compression ratio and lowering the FG to approximately 1.5 and 1/3 G, respectively, may help improve speech discrimination if it worsens with increasing sound levels during HA fitting.</p>","PeriodicalId":94238,"journal":{"name":"The journal of international advanced otology","volume":"20 6","pages":"502-506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11648699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consideration of Sufficient and Insufficient Benefits in Hearing Aid Fitting.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshihiro Nitta, Hajime Sano, Shogo Furuki, Sachie Umehara, Yuki Hara, Taku Yamashita\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/iao.2024.241565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During hearing aid (HA) fitting, individuals may experience better speech discrimination at normal speech levels and worse discrimination at loud speech levels than without an HA. Therefore, we investigated factors that worsen speech discrimination when the speech sound level increases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Speech discrimination was measured in patients aged >20 years who had average hearing thresholds <90 dB on pure-tone audiometry. An insufficient benefit was defined as speech discrimination being better at 65 dB sound pressure level (SPL) with HAs than without HAs and worse at 80 dB SPL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 251 participants (296 ears), 229 and 25 had sufficient benefit and insufficient benefit, respectively. Functional gains (FGs) of sufficient benefit were approximately 1/3 gain (1/3 G) at 500 and 4000 Hz and slightly larger at 1000 and 2000 Hz. Functional gains of insufficient benefit were approximately 1/2 G at 1000 and 2000 Hz, smaller at 500 and 4000 Hz, and approximately 1/3 G at 250 Hz. Moreover, the difference between 1/2 G and FG was significantly larger in the sufficient benefit group at 250 500, and 4000 Hz than in the insufficient benefit group. Additionally, the average compression ratio at 50-80 dB SPL in the insufficient benefit group was approximately 1.1 to 1.2, slightly lower than the standard values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjusting the compression ratio and lowering the FG to approximately 1.5 and 1/3 G, respectively, may help improve speech discrimination if it worsens with increasing sound levels during HA fitting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of international advanced otology\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"502-506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11648699/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of international advanced otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2024.241565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of international advanced otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2024.241565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在配戴助听器时,与没有配戴助听器的人相比,正常言语水平的人可能会有更好的言语歧视,而大声言语水平的人可能会有更严重的言语歧视。因此,我们研究了当语音声级增加时,言语歧视恶化的因素。结果:251名参与者(296只耳朵)中,229名有充分获益,25名有不足获益。功能增益(FGs)在500和4000 Hz时约为1/3增益(1/3 G),在1000和2000 Hz时略大。效益不足的功能增益在1000和2000 Hz时约为1/2 G,在500和4000 Hz时较小,在250 Hz时约为1/3 G。此外,在250、500和4000 Hz时,充分效益组的1/ 2g和FG之间的差异显著大于不足效益组。此外,在50-80 dB声压级时,受益不足组的平均压缩比约为1.1 - 1.2,略低于标准值。结论:调整压缩比和降低FG分别约为1.5 G和1/3 G,可能有助于改善在HA拟合过程中随着声级的增加而恶化的语音识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consideration of Sufficient and Insufficient Benefits in Hearing Aid Fitting.

Background: During hearing aid (HA) fitting, individuals may experience better speech discrimination at normal speech levels and worse discrimination at loud speech levels than without an HA. Therefore, we investigated factors that worsen speech discrimination when the speech sound level increases.

Methods: Speech discrimination was measured in patients aged >20 years who had average hearing thresholds <90 dB on pure-tone audiometry. An insufficient benefit was defined as speech discrimination being better at 65 dB sound pressure level (SPL) with HAs than without HAs and worse at 80 dB SPL.

Results: Of the 251 participants (296 ears), 229 and 25 had sufficient benefit and insufficient benefit, respectively. Functional gains (FGs) of sufficient benefit were approximately 1/3 gain (1/3 G) at 500 and 4000 Hz and slightly larger at 1000 and 2000 Hz. Functional gains of insufficient benefit were approximately 1/2 G at 1000 and 2000 Hz, smaller at 500 and 4000 Hz, and approximately 1/3 G at 250 Hz. Moreover, the difference between 1/2 G and FG was significantly larger in the sufficient benefit group at 250 500, and 4000 Hz than in the insufficient benefit group. Additionally, the average compression ratio at 50-80 dB SPL in the insufficient benefit group was approximately 1.1 to 1.2, slightly lower than the standard values.

Conclusion: Adjusting the compression ratio and lowering the FG to approximately 1.5 and 1/3 G, respectively, may help improve speech discrimination if it worsens with increasing sound levels during HA fitting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of Ebselen in Facial Nerve Crush Injury: An Experimental Study. Thiol-Disulfide Homeostasis in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Rats. Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Pediatric Bilateral Congenital Cholesteatoma: A Report of Two Cases. Unraveling Cochlear Dynamics: The Effect of Clicks, Tone Burst Frequencies, Polarity, and Stimulus Rates on Cochlear Microphonics in Individuals with Normal Hearing. A Strategy for Bone Conduction Device Adoption: Study of Non-Usage Challenges, Skin-Deep Insights and Patient Satisfaction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1