Aitziber Buqué, Norma Bloy, Giulia Petroni, Carlos Jiménez-Cortegana, Ai Sato, Cristina Iribarren, Takahiro Yamazaki, Claudia Galassi, Michal Hensler, Bhavneet Bhinder, Andrea Guarracino, Brady Rippon, Manuel Beltran-Visiedo, Ruth Soler-Agesta, Tania Pannellini, Jitka Fucikova, Sandra Demaria, Xi Kathy Zhou, Olivier Elemento, Silvia C Formenti, Lorenzo Galluzzi
{"title":"放疗剂量、分级和免疫治疗伙伴对HR+乳腺癌小鼠模型的影响","authors":"Aitziber Buqué, Norma Bloy, Giulia Petroni, Carlos Jiménez-Cortegana, Ai Sato, Cristina Iribarren, Takahiro Yamazaki, Claudia Galassi, Michal Hensler, Bhavneet Bhinder, Andrea Guarracino, Brady Rippon, Manuel Beltran-Visiedo, Ruth Soler-Agesta, Tania Pannellini, Jitka Fucikova, Sandra Demaria, Xi Kathy Zhou, Olivier Elemento, Silvia C Formenti, Lorenzo Galluzzi","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Hormone receptor (HR)+ breast cancer is poorly responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In some settings, radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to mediate immunostimulatory effects and promote ICI sensitivity. Methods We investigated whether hypofractionated RT may be successfully combined with ICIs in a mouse model of multifocal, metachronous HR+ mammary carcinogenesis. We hypothesized that focal RT targeting the first detectable (primary) tumor combined with ICIs may generate effective immunity, hence delaying the development of new lesions. Results Focal RT in various doses and fractionations limited primary tumor growth, with an optimum for a 20 Gy X 2 regimen (ablative in ∼90% of mice). The degree of primary disease control, however, did not necessarily correlate with overall survival (OS) extension, owing to changes in the development of new neoplastic lesions contributing to global tumor burden. Adding a PD-1 blocker to focal RT delivered in a 10 Gy X 3, 20 Gy X 2 or 8 Gy X 6 regimen failed to alter OS extension enabled by RT alone. Similar results were obtained with a CTLA4 blocker, an IL1B inhibitor, and a PD-1 blocker plus recombinant FLT3LG when combined with the 10 Gy X 3 regimen. Conclusions In this model of HR+ mammary carcinogenesis, RT to the primary tumor ameliorates OS (to an extent depending on dose and fractionation). Increasing local control by RT alone or RT plus immunotherapy beyond a hitherto undefined threshold, however, does not necessarily inhibit the development of subsequent non-irradiated neoplasms and hence does not necessarily provide extra OS benefits.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of radiotherapy dose, fractionation and immunotherapeutic partner in a mouse model of HR+ mammary carcinogenesis\",\"authors\":\"Aitziber Buqué, Norma Bloy, Giulia Petroni, Carlos Jiménez-Cortegana, Ai Sato, Cristina Iribarren, Takahiro Yamazaki, Claudia Galassi, Michal Hensler, Bhavneet Bhinder, Andrea Guarracino, Brady Rippon, Manuel Beltran-Visiedo, Ruth Soler-Agesta, Tania Pannellini, Jitka Fucikova, Sandra Demaria, Xi Kathy Zhou, Olivier Elemento, Silvia C Formenti, Lorenzo Galluzzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnci/djae329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Hormone receptor (HR)+ breast cancer is poorly responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In some settings, radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to mediate immunostimulatory effects and promote ICI sensitivity. Methods We investigated whether hypofractionated RT may be successfully combined with ICIs in a mouse model of multifocal, metachronous HR+ mammary carcinogenesis. We hypothesized that focal RT targeting the first detectable (primary) tumor combined with ICIs may generate effective immunity, hence delaying the development of new lesions. Results Focal RT in various doses and fractionations limited primary tumor growth, with an optimum for a 20 Gy X 2 regimen (ablative in ∼90% of mice). The degree of primary disease control, however, did not necessarily correlate with overall survival (OS) extension, owing to changes in the development of new neoplastic lesions contributing to global tumor burden. Adding a PD-1 blocker to focal RT delivered in a 10 Gy X 3, 20 Gy X 2 or 8 Gy X 6 regimen failed to alter OS extension enabled by RT alone. Similar results were obtained with a CTLA4 blocker, an IL1B inhibitor, and a PD-1 blocker plus recombinant FLT3LG when combined with the 10 Gy X 3 regimen. Conclusions In this model of HR+ mammary carcinogenesis, RT to the primary tumor ameliorates OS (to an extent depending on dose and fractionation). Increasing local control by RT alone or RT plus immunotherapy beyond a hitherto undefined threshold, however, does not necessarily inhibit the development of subsequent non-irradiated neoplasms and hence does not necessarily provide extra OS benefits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
激素受体(HR)阳性乳腺癌对免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)反应较差。在某些情况下,放射治疗(RT)已被证明介导免疫刺激效应并促进ICI敏感性。方法在小鼠多灶、异时性HR+乳腺癌模型中,研究低分割RT与ICIs能否成功联合。我们假设针对第一个可检测到的(原发)肿瘤的局灶性RT联合ICIs可能产生有效的免疫,从而延迟新病变的发展。结果不同剂量和分级的局灶性放射治疗限制了原发肿瘤的生长,20 Gy x2治疗方案的效果最佳(约90%的小鼠消融)。然而,原发疾病的控制程度并不一定与总生存期(OS)延长相关,因为新肿瘤病变的发展变化会增加全球肿瘤负担。在10 Gy X 3、20 Gy X 2或8 Gy X 6方案的局灶性放疗中添加PD-1阻滞剂未能改变单独放疗所带来的OS延长。CTLA4阻滞剂、IL1B抑制剂和PD-1阻滞剂加重组FLT3LG与10 Gy x3方案联合使用时也获得了类似的结果。结论:在HR+乳腺癌模型中,原发肿瘤的放疗改善了OS(程度取决于剂量和分割)。然而,通过单独放疗或放疗加免疫治疗增加局部控制,超过一个迄今未定义的阈值,并不一定能抑制后续非放疗肿瘤的发展,因此不一定能提供额外的OS益处。
Impact of radiotherapy dose, fractionation and immunotherapeutic partner in a mouse model of HR+ mammary carcinogenesis
Background Hormone receptor (HR)+ breast cancer is poorly responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In some settings, radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to mediate immunostimulatory effects and promote ICI sensitivity. Methods We investigated whether hypofractionated RT may be successfully combined with ICIs in a mouse model of multifocal, metachronous HR+ mammary carcinogenesis. We hypothesized that focal RT targeting the first detectable (primary) tumor combined with ICIs may generate effective immunity, hence delaying the development of new lesions. Results Focal RT in various doses and fractionations limited primary tumor growth, with an optimum for a 20 Gy X 2 regimen (ablative in ∼90% of mice). The degree of primary disease control, however, did not necessarily correlate with overall survival (OS) extension, owing to changes in the development of new neoplastic lesions contributing to global tumor burden. Adding a PD-1 blocker to focal RT delivered in a 10 Gy X 3, 20 Gy X 2 or 8 Gy X 6 regimen failed to alter OS extension enabled by RT alone. Similar results were obtained with a CTLA4 blocker, an IL1B inhibitor, and a PD-1 blocker plus recombinant FLT3LG when combined with the 10 Gy X 3 regimen. Conclusions In this model of HR+ mammary carcinogenesis, RT to the primary tumor ameliorates OS (to an extent depending on dose and fractionation). Increasing local control by RT alone or RT plus immunotherapy beyond a hitherto undefined threshold, however, does not necessarily inhibit the development of subsequent non-irradiated neoplasms and hence does not necessarily provide extra OS benefits.