G.T.A.R.A.(握力/抓握训练与积极的运动活动范围):一项随机对照试验,使用吉他课程恢复单侧手损伤患者的手功能。

Q4 Medicine Acta Medica Philippina Pub Date : 2024-11-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47895/amp.v58i20.9334
Kreza Geovien G Ligaya, Sharon D Ignacio, Daniel Joseph S Morabe, Nathan Neil V Manimtim, Manuel Peter Paul C Jorge
{"title":"G.T.A.R.A.(握力/抓握训练与积极的运动活动范围):一项随机对照试验,使用吉他课程恢复单侧手损伤患者的手功能。","authors":"Kreza Geovien G Ligaya, Sharon D Ignacio, Daniel Joseph S Morabe, Nathan Neil V Manimtim, Manuel Peter Paul C Jorge","doi":"10.47895/amp.v58i20.9334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effects of guitar lessons (intervention group) in comparison to conventional occupational therapy (OT) sessions (control group) on hand function of chronic stroke patients with unilateral hand impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial enrolled 34 chronic stroke patients with unilateral hand impairment. Participants were grouped randomly into intervention (guitar lessons) and control (conventional occupational therapy) groups. Each group participant underwent a total of eight consecutive therapy sessions, twice weekly for an hour each session, at the designated treatment rooms in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of the Philippine General Hospital. Pre- and post-treatment evaluations were done to assess range of motion, grip and pinch strength, and hand functions. Satisfaction surveys were answered at the end of the 8-therapy session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Improvements in hand function were assessed through measurement of range of motion (ROM), grip and pinch strength, and with the use of Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function test, and Purdue Pegboard Test of Manual Dexterity. In this study, the comparison of actual change of passive range of motion (ROM) of the impaired hand from pre- to post-treatment between control and intervention groups showed no statistically significant difference. No statistically significant difference between groups were also observed for the active ROM of the impaired hand. Comparison of function of the impaired hand pre- and post-treatment between control and intervention groups showed no statistically significant difference except for an observed greater improvement with the control group in motor coordination (median [IQR] 0 [-1 to 0] vs 1 [1 to 5], <i>p</i> = 0.004), tip (median [IQR] 0.33 [0 to 0.75] vs 1 [0.58 to 1.5], <i>p</i> = 0.006), and 3-jaw (median [IQR] 0.5 [0 to 0.92] vs 1.08 [0.41 to 2], <i>p</i> = 0.043) pinch strength.In evaluating the satisfaction of participants in both groups, higher mean scores were observed in the control group. No statistically significant difference in most of the questions in the satisfaction survey in both groups.All participants in both groups displayed 100% compliance in attending onsite treatments. Despite not showing statistically significant difference between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.721), an 11.8% tendency for better compliance is found in the intervention group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The specific guitar lesson created and performed in this study as used by 17 participants of the intervention group have brought about improvement in hand function that is comparable with those who underwent traditional occupational therapy. This may be most helpful in areas with limited access to rehabilitation facilities and occupational therapy services. This may also be used as a continuing activity of chronic stroke patients at home to help improve hand function.</p>","PeriodicalId":6994,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Philippina","volume":"58 20","pages":"62-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"G.T.A.R.A. <i>(Grip/Grasp Training with Active Range of Motion Activities Using Guitar)</i>: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Guitar Lessons for Restoring Hand Function among Patients with Unilateral Hand Impairment.\",\"authors\":\"Kreza Geovien G Ligaya, Sharon D Ignacio, Daniel Joseph S Morabe, Nathan Neil V Manimtim, Manuel Peter Paul C Jorge\",\"doi\":\"10.47895/amp.v58i20.9334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effects of guitar lessons (intervention group) in comparison to conventional occupational therapy (OT) sessions (control group) on hand function of chronic stroke patients with unilateral hand impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial enrolled 34 chronic stroke patients with unilateral hand impairment. Participants were grouped randomly into intervention (guitar lessons) and control (conventional occupational therapy) groups. Each group participant underwent a total of eight consecutive therapy sessions, twice weekly for an hour each session, at the designated treatment rooms in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of the Philippine General Hospital. Pre- and post-treatment evaluations were done to assess range of motion, grip and pinch strength, and hand functions. Satisfaction surveys were answered at the end of the 8-therapy session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Improvements in hand function were assessed through measurement of range of motion (ROM), grip and pinch strength, and with the use of Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function test, and Purdue Pegboard Test of Manual Dexterity. In this study, the comparison of actual change of passive range of motion (ROM) of the impaired hand from pre- to post-treatment between control and intervention groups showed no statistically significant difference. No statistically significant difference between groups were also observed for the active ROM of the impaired hand. Comparison of function of the impaired hand pre- and post-treatment between control and intervention groups showed no statistically significant difference except for an observed greater improvement with the control group in motor coordination (median [IQR] 0 [-1 to 0] vs 1 [1 to 5], <i>p</i> = 0.004), tip (median [IQR] 0.33 [0 to 0.75] vs 1 [0.58 to 1.5], <i>p</i> = 0.006), and 3-jaw (median [IQR] 0.5 [0 to 0.92] vs 1.08 [0.41 to 2], <i>p</i> = 0.043) pinch strength.In evaluating the satisfaction of participants in both groups, higher mean scores were observed in the control group. No statistically significant difference in most of the questions in the satisfaction survey in both groups.All participants in both groups displayed 100% compliance in attending onsite treatments. Despite not showing statistically significant difference between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.721), an 11.8% tendency for better compliance is found in the intervention group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The specific guitar lesson created and performed in this study as used by 17 participants of the intervention group have brought about improvement in hand function that is comparable with those who underwent traditional occupational therapy. This may be most helpful in areas with limited access to rehabilitation facilities and occupational therapy services. This may also be used as a continuing activity of chronic stroke patients at home to help improve hand function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Medica Philippina\",\"volume\":\"58 20\",\"pages\":\"62-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628418/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Medica Philippina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.v58i20.9334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Philippina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.v58i20.9334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨吉他课(干预组)与常规职业治疗(对照组)对慢性脑卒中单侧手功能损伤患者手功能的影响。方法:本随机对照试验纳入34例单侧手部损伤的慢性脑卒中患者。参与者被随机分为干预组(吉他课)和对照组(传统的职业治疗)。每组参与者在菲律宾总医院康复医学部指定的治疗室共连续接受八次治疗,每周两次,每次一小时。治疗前和治疗后进行评估,以评估运动范围,握力和捏力以及手功能。满意度调查在8个疗程结束时回答。结果:通过测量运动范围(ROM)、握力和捏力,以及使用Beery-Buktenica视觉-运动整合发展测试、Jebsen-Taylor手功能测试和Purdue手灵活性钉板测试来评估手功能的改善。在本研究中,对照组与干预组治疗前后受损手被动活动度(ROM)的实际变化比较,差异无统计学意义。损伤手的活动ROM在两组间也无统计学差异。比较功能受损的手预处理和后处理控制和干预组之间无显著差别,除了一个观察到大的改善与对照组在运动协调(中值(差)0(1 - 0)和1 (1 - 5),p = 0.004),提示(中值(差)0.33(0到0.75)和1(0.58到1.5),p = 0.006),和3-jaw(中值(差)0.5(0到0.92)和1.08 (0.41 - 2),p = 0.043)捏力量。在评估两组参与者的满意度时,对照组的平均得分较高。两组在满意度调查的大部分问题上无统计学差异。两组患者均100%接受现场治疗。尽管组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.721),但干预组依从性提高的趋势为11.8%。结论:在本研究中,17名干预组的参与者使用了特定的吉他课,其手部功能的改善与接受传统职业治疗的患者相当。这在获得康复设施和职业治疗服务的机会有限的地区可能最有帮助。这也可以作为慢性中风患者在家中的持续活动,以帮助改善手功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
G.T.A.R.A. (Grip/Grasp Training with Active Range of Motion Activities Using Guitar): A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Guitar Lessons for Restoring Hand Function among Patients with Unilateral Hand Impairment.

Objective: To determine the effects of guitar lessons (intervention group) in comparison to conventional occupational therapy (OT) sessions (control group) on hand function of chronic stroke patients with unilateral hand impairment.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 34 chronic stroke patients with unilateral hand impairment. Participants were grouped randomly into intervention (guitar lessons) and control (conventional occupational therapy) groups. Each group participant underwent a total of eight consecutive therapy sessions, twice weekly for an hour each session, at the designated treatment rooms in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of the Philippine General Hospital. Pre- and post-treatment evaluations were done to assess range of motion, grip and pinch strength, and hand functions. Satisfaction surveys were answered at the end of the 8-therapy session.

Results: Improvements in hand function were assessed through measurement of range of motion (ROM), grip and pinch strength, and with the use of Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function test, and Purdue Pegboard Test of Manual Dexterity. In this study, the comparison of actual change of passive range of motion (ROM) of the impaired hand from pre- to post-treatment between control and intervention groups showed no statistically significant difference. No statistically significant difference between groups were also observed for the active ROM of the impaired hand. Comparison of function of the impaired hand pre- and post-treatment between control and intervention groups showed no statistically significant difference except for an observed greater improvement with the control group in motor coordination (median [IQR] 0 [-1 to 0] vs 1 [1 to 5], p = 0.004), tip (median [IQR] 0.33 [0 to 0.75] vs 1 [0.58 to 1.5], p = 0.006), and 3-jaw (median [IQR] 0.5 [0 to 0.92] vs 1.08 [0.41 to 2], p = 0.043) pinch strength.In evaluating the satisfaction of participants in both groups, higher mean scores were observed in the control group. No statistically significant difference in most of the questions in the satisfaction survey in both groups.All participants in both groups displayed 100% compliance in attending onsite treatments. Despite not showing statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.721), an 11.8% tendency for better compliance is found in the intervention group.

Conclusion: The specific guitar lesson created and performed in this study as used by 17 participants of the intervention group have brought about improvement in hand function that is comparable with those who underwent traditional occupational therapy. This may be most helpful in areas with limited access to rehabilitation facilities and occupational therapy services. This may also be used as a continuing activity of chronic stroke patients at home to help improve hand function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Medica Philippina
Acta Medica Philippina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
期刊最新文献
Clinical Profile and Outcomes of COVID-19 Positive Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in a Tertiary Government COVID-19 Referral Center. Coping Strategies to Achieve Food Security among Households with Children in an Urban Poor Community in Quezon City during COVID-19. Clinical Profile and Prescribing Patterns of Therapy in Children with Bronchial Asthma in a Rural Site in the Philippines: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Comparison of Ectasia versus Pseudoectasia using the Ectasia Risk Factor Score System. Effect of a Brief Training Program on the Knowledge of Filipino Primary Care Providers in a Rural and a Remote Setting: a Before and After Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1