机械通气脱机时肺超声评分和膈超声:在COVID-19患者和非COVID-19患者中有差异吗?

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36416/1806-3756/e20240302
Laura Cordeiro Madeira, Paulo de Tarso Dalcin, Gabriele Heinen Schuster, Bruna Conte, Jonas Michel Wolf, Annia Schreiber, Jean-Jacques Rouby, Felippe Leopoldo Dexheimer-Neto
{"title":"机械通气脱机时肺超声评分和膈超声:在COVID-19患者和非COVID-19患者中有差异吗?","authors":"Laura Cordeiro Madeira, Paulo de Tarso Dalcin, Gabriele Heinen Schuster, Bruna Conte, Jonas Michel Wolf, Annia Schreiber, Jean-Jacques Rouby, Felippe Leopoldo Dexheimer-Neto","doi":"10.36416/1806-3756/e20240302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare pre-extubation physiological characteristics and ultrasound variables between patients intubated for COVID-19 compared to a clinical population and those intubated for other reasons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for more than 48 h. Patients were divided into two groups: those intubated for COVID-19-induced ARDS and those intubated for other clinical reasons. Ultrasound assessment of lung and diaphragm function was performed before extubation. The results were compared between the two groups of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison with the patients without COVID-19, those with the disease were younger (a median age of 58 [46-76] years vs. a median age of 75 [69-85] years; p = 0.01), had fewer comorbidities (a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2 [1-4] vs. a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 5 [4-6]; p < 0.01), and were less severely ill at admission (a median APACHE II score of 9 [8-14] vs. a median APACHE II score of 18 [13-22]; p < 0.01). In addition, the median duration of IMV was longer in the COVID-19 patients (11 [9-23] days vs. 6 [3-8] days; p < 0.01). Although extubation success rates were similar between the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups (22 [71%] vs. 35 [77.8%]), median lung ultrasound score differed between the two groups (23 [18-25] vs. 15 [11-18]; p < 0.01), as did median diaphragmatic excursion (2.1 [1.7-2.4] vs. 1.7 [1.2-2.0]; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although patients with COVID-19 requiring ventilatory support are younger and have fewer comorbidities than those intubated for other clinical reasons, they experience longer hospital stays. Although lung ultrasound score can differ between patients with and without COVID-19, these differences do not significantly translate into extubation success rates. Therefore, the utility of ultrasound scores in weaning COVID-19 patients from IMV needs further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":14845,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","volume":"50 5","pages":"e20240302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11601084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung ultrasound score and diaphragm ultrasound in weaning from mechanical ventilation: are they different in patients with and without COVID-19?\",\"authors\":\"Laura Cordeiro Madeira, Paulo de Tarso Dalcin, Gabriele Heinen Schuster, Bruna Conte, Jonas Michel Wolf, Annia Schreiber, Jean-Jacques Rouby, Felippe Leopoldo Dexheimer-Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.36416/1806-3756/e20240302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare pre-extubation physiological characteristics and ultrasound variables between patients intubated for COVID-19 compared to a clinical population and those intubated for other reasons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for more than 48 h. Patients were divided into two groups: those intubated for COVID-19-induced ARDS and those intubated for other clinical reasons. Ultrasound assessment of lung and diaphragm function was performed before extubation. The results were compared between the two groups of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison with the patients without COVID-19, those with the disease were younger (a median age of 58 [46-76] years vs. a median age of 75 [69-85] years; p = 0.01), had fewer comorbidities (a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2 [1-4] vs. a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 5 [4-6]; p < 0.01), and were less severely ill at admission (a median APACHE II score of 9 [8-14] vs. a median APACHE II score of 18 [13-22]; p < 0.01). In addition, the median duration of IMV was longer in the COVID-19 patients (11 [9-23] days vs. 6 [3-8] days; p < 0.01). Although extubation success rates were similar between the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups (22 [71%] vs. 35 [77.8%]), median lung ultrasound score differed between the two groups (23 [18-25] vs. 15 [11-18]; p < 0.01), as did median diaphragmatic excursion (2.1 [1.7-2.4] vs. 1.7 [1.2-2.0]; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although patients with COVID-19 requiring ventilatory support are younger and have fewer comorbidities than those intubated for other clinical reasons, they experience longer hospital stays. Although lung ultrasound score can differ between patients with and without COVID-19, these differences do not significantly translate into extubation success rates. Therefore, the utility of ultrasound scores in weaning COVID-19 patients from IMV needs further study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia\",\"volume\":\"50 5\",\"pages\":\"e20240302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11601084/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20240302\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20240302","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较临床人群与其他原因插管的COVID-19患者拔管前生理特征和超声变量。方法:对一项有创机械通气(IMV)时间超过48 h的前瞻性队列研究进行二次分析。将患者分为两组:因covid -19诱导的ARDS插管组和因其他临床原因插管组。拔管前行超声检查肺和膈功能。比较两组患者的结果。结果:与无COVID-19患者相比,患者年龄更年轻(中位年龄58[46-76]岁vs中位年龄75[69-85]岁;p = 0.01),合并症较少(Charlson共病指数中位数为2[1-4],而Charlson共病指数中位数为5 [4-6];p < 0.01),入院时病情较轻(APACHE II评分中位数为9 [8-14],APACHE II评分中位数为18 [13-22];P < 0.01)。此外,COVID-19患者的中位IMV持续时间更长(11[9-23]天vs. 6[3-8]天;P < 0.01)。虽然COVID-19组与非COVID-19组拔管成功率相似(22[71%]对35[77.8%]),但两组间肺超声中位评分差异较大(23[18-25]对15 [11-18];P < 0.01),膈正中偏移(2.1 [1.7-2.4]vs. 1.7 [1.2-2.0];P < 0.01)。结论:尽管与其他临床原因插管的患者相比,需要呼吸机支持的COVID-19患者更年轻,合并症更少,但他们的住院时间更长。尽管肺部超声评分在患有和未患有COVID-19的患者之间存在差异,但这些差异并未显着转化为拔管成功率。因此,超声评分在COVID-19患者IMV脱机中的应用有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lung ultrasound score and diaphragm ultrasound in weaning from mechanical ventilation: are they different in patients with and without COVID-19?

Objective: To compare pre-extubation physiological characteristics and ultrasound variables between patients intubated for COVID-19 compared to a clinical population and those intubated for other reasons.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for more than 48 h. Patients were divided into two groups: those intubated for COVID-19-induced ARDS and those intubated for other clinical reasons. Ultrasound assessment of lung and diaphragm function was performed before extubation. The results were compared between the two groups of patients.

Results: In comparison with the patients without COVID-19, those with the disease were younger (a median age of 58 [46-76] years vs. a median age of 75 [69-85] years; p = 0.01), had fewer comorbidities (a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2 [1-4] vs. a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 5 [4-6]; p < 0.01), and were less severely ill at admission (a median APACHE II score of 9 [8-14] vs. a median APACHE II score of 18 [13-22]; p < 0.01). In addition, the median duration of IMV was longer in the COVID-19 patients (11 [9-23] days vs. 6 [3-8] days; p < 0.01). Although extubation success rates were similar between the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups (22 [71%] vs. 35 [77.8%]), median lung ultrasound score differed between the two groups (23 [18-25] vs. 15 [11-18]; p < 0.01), as did median diaphragmatic excursion (2.1 [1.7-2.4] vs. 1.7 [1.2-2.0]; p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Although patients with COVID-19 requiring ventilatory support are younger and have fewer comorbidities than those intubated for other clinical reasons, they experience longer hospital stays. Although lung ultrasound score can differ between patients with and without COVID-19, these differences do not significantly translate into extubation success rates. Therefore, the utility of ultrasound scores in weaning COVID-19 patients from IMV needs further study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
118
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Pulmonology publishes scientific articles that contribute to the improvement of knowledge in the field of the lung diseases and related areas.
期刊最新文献
Incidence rate, clinical profile, and outcomes of COVID-19 in adults with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Life-threatening pulmonary embolism seen as hyperdense clots on unenhanced CT. A new era of cystic fibrosis therapy with CFTR modulators. Asthma-related deaths in Brazil: data from an ecological study. Complicated tracheal diverticulitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1