提高马凡氏综合征伴晶状体异位患者囊内人工晶状体植入术配方的准确性。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of cataract and refractive surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001592
Xin Shen, Zexu Chen, Wannan Jia, Yalei Wang, Xinyao Chen, Tianhui Chen, Yan Liu, Linghao Song, Qiuyi Huo, Yongxiang Jiang
{"title":"提高马凡氏综合征伴晶状体异位患者囊内人工晶状体植入术配方的准确性。","authors":"Xin Shen, Zexu Chen, Wannan Jia, Yalei Wang, Xinyao Chen, Tianhui Chen, Yan Liu, Linghao Song, Qiuyi Huo, Yongxiang Jiang","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To improve the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas by modifying the effective lens position (ELP) equations for patients with Marfan Syndrome (MFS) and ectopia lentis (EL) undergoing in-the-bag IOL implantation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The formula-specific ELP was obtained from the SRK/T, T2, Holladay I, and HofferQ formulas. The back-calculated ELP was obtained based on the vergence formula using preoperative biometry, postoperative refraction, and the IOL power. The Generalized Linear Models or Gradient Boosting Machines were used to predict ELP or ELP error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 255 patients (255 eyes) were assigned randomly into a training set and a validation set (7:3 ratio). Linear correlation identified axial length(AL), corneal height, and white-to-white as predictors for ELP and ELP error for patients with shorter AL (AL ≤ 24 mm). For those with longer AL (AL > 24 mm), AL and the central corneal radius were identified as the primary predictors. Incorporating these predictors into the modified ELP formula significantly improved the accuracy in the validation set, including SRK/T, T2, Haigis, Holladay I, and HofferQ formulas. The improvement was more pronounced in patients with shorter AL. Additionally, the GLM-modified formulas outperformed both the Barrett Universal II and Kane formulas. The accuracy across different ocular dimensions was comparable among the modified formulas, based on which an online calculator was developed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using the more accurately predicted ELP can significantly improve the accuracy of existing formulas in patients with MFS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Accuracy of Lens Formulas for in-the-bag Intraocular Lens Implantation in Marfan Syndrome Patients with Ectopia Lentis.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Shen, Zexu Chen, Wannan Jia, Yalei Wang, Xinyao Chen, Tianhui Chen, Yan Liu, Linghao Song, Qiuyi Huo, Yongxiang Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To improve the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas by modifying the effective lens position (ELP) equations for patients with Marfan Syndrome (MFS) and ectopia lentis (EL) undergoing in-the-bag IOL implantation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The formula-specific ELP was obtained from the SRK/T, T2, Holladay I, and HofferQ formulas. The back-calculated ELP was obtained based on the vergence formula using preoperative biometry, postoperative refraction, and the IOL power. The Generalized Linear Models or Gradient Boosting Machines were used to predict ELP or ELP error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 255 patients (255 eyes) were assigned randomly into a training set and a validation set (7:3 ratio). Linear correlation identified axial length(AL), corneal height, and white-to-white as predictors for ELP and ELP error for patients with shorter AL (AL ≤ 24 mm). For those with longer AL (AL > 24 mm), AL and the central corneal radius were identified as the primary predictors. Incorporating these predictors into the modified ELP formula significantly improved the accuracy in the validation set, including SRK/T, T2, Haigis, Holladay I, and HofferQ formulas. The improvement was more pronounced in patients with shorter AL. Additionally, the GLM-modified formulas outperformed both the Barrett Universal II and Kane formulas. The accuracy across different ocular dimensions was comparable among the modified formulas, based on which an online calculator was developed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using the more accurately predicted ELP can significantly improve the accuracy of existing formulas in patients with MFS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001592\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001592","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过修改马凡氏综合征(MFS)和晶状体异位(EL)患者囊内人工晶状体植入术的有效晶状体位置(ELP)方程,提高人工晶状体(IOL)度数计算公式的准确性。单位:复旦大学附属眼科医院。设计:回顾性队列研究。方法:从SRK/T、T2、Holladay I和HofferQ配方中获得特异性ELP。通过术前生物测量、术后屈光和人工晶体度数,根据会聚公式反演ELP。采用广义线性模型或梯度增强机预测ELP或ELP误差。结果:255例患者(255只眼)随机分为训练集和验证集(比例为7:3)。线性相关性发现轴长(AL)、角膜高度和白对白是较短AL (AL≤24 mm)患者ELP和ELP误差的预测因子。对于AL较长(AL bbb24 mm)的患者,AL和角膜中央半径被确定为主要预测因素。将这些预测因子纳入修改后的ELP公式显著提高了验证集(包括SRK/T、T2、Haigis、Holladay I和HofferQ公式)的准确性。在AL较短的患者中,改善更为明显。此外,glm改良配方优于Barrett Universal II和Kane配方。修正后的公式在不同眼尺度上的准确度具有可比性,并以此为基础开发了在线计算器。结论:采用更准确的ELP预测可显著提高MFS患者现有处方的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving the Accuracy of Lens Formulas for in-the-bag Intraocular Lens Implantation in Marfan Syndrome Patients with Ectopia Lentis.

Purpose: To improve the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas by modifying the effective lens position (ELP) equations for patients with Marfan Syndrome (MFS) and ectopia lentis (EL) undergoing in-the-bag IOL implantation.

Setting: Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: The formula-specific ELP was obtained from the SRK/T, T2, Holladay I, and HofferQ formulas. The back-calculated ELP was obtained based on the vergence formula using preoperative biometry, postoperative refraction, and the IOL power. The Generalized Linear Models or Gradient Boosting Machines were used to predict ELP or ELP error.

Results: A total of 255 patients (255 eyes) were assigned randomly into a training set and a validation set (7:3 ratio). Linear correlation identified axial length(AL), corneal height, and white-to-white as predictors for ELP and ELP error for patients with shorter AL (AL ≤ 24 mm). For those with longer AL (AL > 24 mm), AL and the central corneal radius were identified as the primary predictors. Incorporating these predictors into the modified ELP formula significantly improved the accuracy in the validation set, including SRK/T, T2, Haigis, Holladay I, and HofferQ formulas. The improvement was more pronounced in patients with shorter AL. Additionally, the GLM-modified formulas outperformed both the Barrett Universal II and Kane formulas. The accuracy across different ocular dimensions was comparable among the modified formulas, based on which an online calculator was developed.

Conclusions: Using the more accurately predicted ELP can significantly improve the accuracy of existing formulas in patients with MFS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
期刊最新文献
Comparing visual outcomes of keratorefractive lenticule extraction, PRK, and LASIK procedures in the military population. Endophthalmitis rates after secondary intraocular lens surgeries: 11-year Medicare fee-for-service analysis. Longitudinal outcomes of iStent inject with cataract surgery compared with cataract surgery alone: real-world data from the Fight Glaucoma Blindness registry. Comparison of intraocular lens power formulas for negative diopter intraocular lens implantation for high myopia. Virtual follow-up after cataract surgery: systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1