Astrid Grouls, Yangseon Park, Elizabeth Kvale, Bindu Akkanti
{"title":"姑息治疗和重症医师对专科姑息治疗参与体外膜氧合治疗的不同看法。","authors":"Astrid Grouls, Yangseon Park, Elizabeth Kvale, Bindu Akkanti","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> There is limited understanding of critical care (CC) and specialist palliative care (SPC) professionals' perceptions regarding the role and utility of SPC for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An 18-item survey was distributed via convenience sampling and snowballing strategies to CC and SPC attendings working with veno-venous ECMO patients. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 75 surveys were completed. Many CC professionals indicated that SPC consultation was not routinely helpful (5% vs. 71%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Responses varied on the appropriateness of discussing SPC with patients/families prognosis (81% SPC vs. 47% CC, <i>p</i> < 0.05), end-of-life preferences (100% vs. 62%, <i>p</i> < 0.05), goals of care (95% vs. 58%, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and code status (76% vs. 43%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Most respondents indicated that psychosocial support and multidisciplinary team collaborations were within the SPC scope. CC professionals were less likely to indicate that discussion of the care trajectory with patients/families was within SPC scope.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"251-256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative Care and Intensivists' Different Perspectives on Specialist Palliative Care Engagement in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Care.\",\"authors\":\"Astrid Grouls, Yangseon Park, Elizabeth Kvale, Bindu Akkanti\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jpm.2024.0231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> There is limited understanding of critical care (CC) and specialist palliative care (SPC) professionals' perceptions regarding the role and utility of SPC for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An 18-item survey was distributed via convenience sampling and snowballing strategies to CC and SPC attendings working with veno-venous ECMO patients. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 75 surveys were completed. Many CC professionals indicated that SPC consultation was not routinely helpful (5% vs. 71%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Responses varied on the appropriateness of discussing SPC with patients/families prognosis (81% SPC vs. 47% CC, <i>p</i> < 0.05), end-of-life preferences (100% vs. 62%, <i>p</i> < 0.05), goals of care (95% vs. 58%, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and code status (76% vs. 43%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Most respondents indicated that psychosocial support and multidisciplinary team collaborations were within the SPC scope. CC professionals were less likely to indicate that discussion of the care trajectory with patients/families was within SPC scope.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"251-256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0231\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
引言:对于重症监护(CC)和专科姑息治疗(SPC)专业人员对SPC在体外膜氧合(ECMO)患者中的作用和效用的看法,了解有限。方法:采用方便抽样和滚雪球策略对处理静脉-静脉ECMO患者的CC和SPC主治医师进行18项调查。结果:共完成问卷调查75份。许多CC专业人士表示SPC咨询并没有常规帮助(5%对71%,p < 0.05)。在讨论SPC与患者/家属预后的适当性(81% SPC vs 47% CC, p < 0.05)、临终偏好(100% vs 62%, p < 0.05)、护理目标(95% vs 58%, p < 0.05)和代码状态(76% vs 43%, p < 0.05)方面,反应各不相同。结论:大多数受访者表示心理社会支持和多学科团队合作在SPC范围内。CC专业人员不太可能指出与患者/家属讨论护理轨迹在SPC范围内。
Palliative Care and Intensivists' Different Perspectives on Specialist Palliative Care Engagement in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Care.
Introduction: There is limited understanding of critical care (CC) and specialist palliative care (SPC) professionals' perceptions regarding the role and utility of SPC for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Methods: An 18-item survey was distributed via convenience sampling and snowballing strategies to CC and SPC attendings working with veno-venous ECMO patients. Results: A total of 75 surveys were completed. Many CC professionals indicated that SPC consultation was not routinely helpful (5% vs. 71%, p < 0.05). Responses varied on the appropriateness of discussing SPC with patients/families prognosis (81% SPC vs. 47% CC, p < 0.05), end-of-life preferences (100% vs. 62%, p < 0.05), goals of care (95% vs. 58%, p < 0.05), and code status (76% vs. 43%, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Most respondents indicated that psychosocial support and multidisciplinary team collaborations were within the SPC scope. CC professionals were less likely to indicate that discussion of the care trajectory with patients/families was within SPC scope.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments.
The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.