3d钛椎间笼设计优化。第一部分:沉降的体外生物力学研究:优化3d -钛体间笼设计。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.014
Jeremy A Lombardo, Dan Wills, Tian Wang, Matthew Pelletier, S Harrison Farber, Brian P Kelly, Juan S Uribe, Jay D Turner, Frank Vizesi, William R Walsh
{"title":"3d钛椎间笼设计优化。第一部分:沉降的体外生物力学研究:优化3d -钛体间笼设计。","authors":"Jeremy A Lombardo, Dan Wills, Tian Wang, Matthew Pelletier, S Harrison Farber, Brian P Kelly, Juan S Uribe, Jay D Turner, Frank Vizesi, William R Walsh","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>3D-printed titanium cage designs can incorporate complex, porous features for bone ingrowth and a greater surface area for minimizing subsidence. In a companion study (Part 1), we determined that increased surface area leads to decreased subsidence; however, it remains unclear how increasing the cage surface area, resulting in a smaller graft aperture, influences fusion.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We evaluated the effects of surface area of 3D-printed titanium cages and the use of autologous bone grafts on spinal fusion in sheep.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In vivo large animal study in 12 sheep.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interbody fusion was performed in 12 adult sheep at 24 levels (L2-3 and L4-5) using 3D-printed titanium cages with bilateral pedicle screw fixation. The cage designs varied in aperture: standard (low endplate surface area), small (medium endplate surface area), or none (high endplate surface area). These cages were packed with autologous iliac crest bone grafts (ICBG). A fourth group was implanted without bone grafts, using the no-aperture cage. Fusion was evaluated at 16 weeks via manual palpation, microcomputed tomography (microCT), histology, and histomorphometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Standard, small, and no-aperture cages packed with ICBG resulted in high fusion rates (80%, 100%, and 83%, respectively) at 16 weeks by manual palpation, and these results were not significantly different. Implantation without ICBG was associated with a significantly lower fusion rate (33%, p<.05). Histological, histomorphometry, and microCT results supported the findings obtained by manual palpation; findings from these modalities showed new bone spanning the vertebral endplates in the spines graded as fused by manual palpation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Similar fusion results for standard, small, and no-aperture cage designs packed with ICBG suggest that aperture size does not influence fusion results in the sheep model. However, without ICBG grafting, fusion was significantly decreased, suggesting that graft material is necessary to predictably obtain fusion in this model. When the in vitro subsidence data (companion study, Part 1) is considered with the in vivo fusion data described here, porous 3D-printed titanium cages with maximal surface endplate contact and bone grafting perform favorably, resulting in low subsidence and high fusion rates.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>3D-printed porous titanium interbody cages are novel devices with increasing clinical use. The study results show that the aperture size of the interbody cage did not influence fusion in a large animal (sheep) model. The use of bone graft material was the most important variable affecting fusion. These data suggest that the clinical use of 3D Ti cages without graft material should be avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of 3D-printed titanium interbody cage design. Part 2: An in vivo study of spinal fusion in sheep.\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy A Lombardo, Dan Wills, Tian Wang, Matthew Pelletier, S Harrison Farber, Brian P Kelly, Juan S Uribe, Jay D Turner, Frank Vizesi, William R Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>3D-printed titanium cage designs can incorporate complex, porous features for bone ingrowth and a greater surface area for minimizing subsidence. In a companion study (Part 1), we determined that increased surface area leads to decreased subsidence; however, it remains unclear how increasing the cage surface area, resulting in a smaller graft aperture, influences fusion.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We evaluated the effects of surface area of 3D-printed titanium cages and the use of autologous bone grafts on spinal fusion in sheep.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In vivo large animal study in 12 sheep.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interbody fusion was performed in 12 adult sheep at 24 levels (L2-3 and L4-5) using 3D-printed titanium cages with bilateral pedicle screw fixation. The cage designs varied in aperture: standard (low endplate surface area), small (medium endplate surface area), or none (high endplate surface area). These cages were packed with autologous iliac crest bone grafts (ICBG). A fourth group was implanted without bone grafts, using the no-aperture cage. Fusion was evaluated at 16 weeks via manual palpation, microcomputed tomography (microCT), histology, and histomorphometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Standard, small, and no-aperture cages packed with ICBG resulted in high fusion rates (80%, 100%, and 83%, respectively) at 16 weeks by manual palpation, and these results were not significantly different. Implantation without ICBG was associated with a significantly lower fusion rate (33%, p<.05). Histological, histomorphometry, and microCT results supported the findings obtained by manual palpation; findings from these modalities showed new bone spanning the vertebral endplates in the spines graded as fused by manual palpation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Similar fusion results for standard, small, and no-aperture cage designs packed with ICBG suggest that aperture size does not influence fusion results in the sheep model. However, without ICBG grafting, fusion was significantly decreased, suggesting that graft material is necessary to predictably obtain fusion in this model. When the in vitro subsidence data (companion study, Part 1) is considered with the in vivo fusion data described here, porous 3D-printed titanium cages with maximal surface endplate contact and bone grafting perform favorably, resulting in low subsidence and high fusion rates.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>3D-printed porous titanium interbody cages are novel devices with increasing clinical use. The study results show that the aperture size of the interbody cage did not influence fusion in a large animal (sheep) model. The use of bone graft material was the most important variable affecting fusion. These data suggest that the clinical use of 3D Ti cages without graft material should be avoided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.014\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:3d打印钛笼设计可以结合复杂的多孔特征,以促进骨骼向内生长,并具有更大的表面积,以最大限度地减少下沉。在一项配套研究(第1部分)中,我们确定地表面积增加会导致下沉减少;然而,目前尚不清楚增加笼的表面积,导致更小的接枝孔径,如何影响融合。目的:评价3d打印钛笼的表面积和自体骨移植对绵羊脊柱融合的影响。研究设计:12只羊的体内大型动物研究。方法:采用3d打印钛笼双侧椎弓根螺钉固定,对12只成年羊进行24节段(L2-3和L4-5)椎间融合术。笼的设计孔径不同:标准(低端板表面积),小(中等端板表面积),或没有(高端板表面积)。这些笼内填充了自体髂骨移植物(ICBG)。第四组不植骨,采用无孔笼。16周时通过手触诊、显微计算机断层扫描(microcomputer tomography, microCT)、组织学和组织形态计量学评估融合情况。结果:用ICBG填充的标准、小和无孔笼在16周时通过手触诊获得高融合率(分别为80%、100%和83%),这些结果没有显著差异。结论:填充ICBG的标准笼、小笼和无孔径笼设计的融合结果相似,表明孔径大小不影响绵羊模型的融合结果。然而,没有ICBG接枝,融合明显减少,这表明在该模型中,需要接枝材料来实现可预测的融合。当体外沉降数据(配套研究,第1部分)与本文描述的体内融合数据相结合时,具有最大表面终板接触和植骨的多孔3d打印钛笼表现良好,导致低沉降和高融合率。临床意义:3d打印多孔钛体间笼是一种新型器械,临床应用越来越广泛。研究结果表明,在大型动物(羊)模型中,体间笼的孔径大小对融合没有影响。植骨材料的使用是影响融合最重要的因素。这些数据提示临床应避免使用无移植物材料的3D钛笼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimization of 3D-printed titanium interbody cage design. Part 2: An in vivo study of spinal fusion in sheep.

Background context: 3D-printed titanium cage designs can incorporate complex, porous features for bone ingrowth and a greater surface area for minimizing subsidence. In a companion study (Part 1), we determined that increased surface area leads to decreased subsidence; however, it remains unclear how increasing the cage surface area, resulting in a smaller graft aperture, influences fusion.

Purpose: We evaluated the effects of surface area of 3D-printed titanium cages and the use of autologous bone grafts on spinal fusion in sheep.

Study design: In vivo large animal study in 12 sheep.

Methods: Interbody fusion was performed in 12 adult sheep at 24 levels (L2-3 and L4-5) using 3D-printed titanium cages with bilateral pedicle screw fixation. The cage designs varied in aperture: standard (low endplate surface area), small (medium endplate surface area), or none (high endplate surface area). These cages were packed with autologous iliac crest bone grafts (ICBG). A fourth group was implanted without bone grafts, using the no-aperture cage. Fusion was evaluated at 16 weeks via manual palpation, microcomputed tomography (microCT), histology, and histomorphometry.

Results: Standard, small, and no-aperture cages packed with ICBG resulted in high fusion rates (80%, 100%, and 83%, respectively) at 16 weeks by manual palpation, and these results were not significantly different. Implantation without ICBG was associated with a significantly lower fusion rate (33%, p<.05). Histological, histomorphometry, and microCT results supported the findings obtained by manual palpation; findings from these modalities showed new bone spanning the vertebral endplates in the spines graded as fused by manual palpation.

Conclusions: Similar fusion results for standard, small, and no-aperture cage designs packed with ICBG suggest that aperture size does not influence fusion results in the sheep model. However, without ICBG grafting, fusion was significantly decreased, suggesting that graft material is necessary to predictably obtain fusion in this model. When the in vitro subsidence data (companion study, Part 1) is considered with the in vivo fusion data described here, porous 3D-printed titanium cages with maximal surface endplate contact and bone grafting perform favorably, resulting in low subsidence and high fusion rates.

Clinical significance: 3D-printed porous titanium interbody cages are novel devices with increasing clinical use. The study results show that the aperture size of the interbody cage did not influence fusion in a large animal (sheep) model. The use of bone graft material was the most important variable affecting fusion. These data suggest that the clinical use of 3D Ti cages without graft material should be avoided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Biomechanical differences of three cephalic fixation methods for patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation in the setting of congenital atlas occipitalization: a finite element analysis. Patient acceptance of reoperation risk for lumbar decompression versus fusion. A cost-effectiveness analysis of intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation for the treatment of chronic low back pain. Bodily growth and the intervertebral disc: a longitudinal MRI study in healthy adolescents. Contact between leaked cement and adjacent vertebral endplate induces a greater risk of adjacent vertebral fracture with vertebral bone cement augmentation biomechanically.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1