第一步:航海家方舟血管通路装置的早期可行性研究。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1177/11297298241302887
John Ross, Stephen Hohmann, Alan Glowczwski, Justin Glowczwski, Anishaa Potnis, April Lovelady, Ashok Gowda
{"title":"第一步:航海家方舟血管通路装置的早期可行性研究。","authors":"John Ross, Stephen Hohmann, Alan Glowczwski, Justin Glowczwski, Anishaa Potnis, April Lovelady, Ashok Gowda","doi":"10.1177/11297298241302887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report the 6-month outcomes of the Ark Cannulation Trial (ACT) I early feasibility study. This investigation examined the Ark as a potential innovative access tool for overcoming cannulation-related challenges and improving arteriovenous fistula (AVF) dependent hemodialysis through targeted cannulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During this first-in-human, interventional, prospective, single arm, single site investigation, 13 patients were treated. Cohort 1 included patients with existing fistulas meeting the criteria for Ark implantation at planned sites, including depth (4-15 mm), diameter (⩾4 mm), flow (⩾500 mL/min) and a poorly accessible cannulation zone. Cohort 2 included patients who underwent AVF creation and implantation of Arks at time of initial surgery. For both Cohorts, clinical need determined if one or two Arks were implanted. The primary endpoint was effective initial cannulation of the access site after Ark implantation. The secondary endpoint was continued access of the Ark cannulation zone for hemodialysis and evaluation of device or procedure-related adverse events collected for 6 months post-implantation. The exploratory endpoint evaluated the Ark implantation procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 13 patients, 2 were withdrawn prior to initial cannulation through the Ark-1 patient due to an exacerbated baseline condition and the other patient due to loss of follow-up. In the efficacy analysis, 11 of 13 treated patients demonstrated successful primary and secondary outcomes. Of the 11 treated patients who initiated cannulation through the Arks, 100% experienced successful primary and secondary outcomes. None of the patients experienced adverse events related to the Ark and surgeons had the necessary skills to implant Arks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrated the Ark could be used successfully in End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients undergoing hemodialysis three times a week. These results suggest preliminary safety and efficacy of the Ark as a promising cannulation tool for dialysis vascular access and warrant further exploration of long-term safety and effectiveness through a pivotal clinical study involving a larger population and extended follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298241302887"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ACT I early feasibility study of the Voyager Ark vascular access device.\",\"authors\":\"John Ross, Stephen Hohmann, Alan Glowczwski, Justin Glowczwski, Anishaa Potnis, April Lovelady, Ashok Gowda\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298241302887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report the 6-month outcomes of the Ark Cannulation Trial (ACT) I early feasibility study. This investigation examined the Ark as a potential innovative access tool for overcoming cannulation-related challenges and improving arteriovenous fistula (AVF) dependent hemodialysis through targeted cannulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During this first-in-human, interventional, prospective, single arm, single site investigation, 13 patients were treated. Cohort 1 included patients with existing fistulas meeting the criteria for Ark implantation at planned sites, including depth (4-15 mm), diameter (⩾4 mm), flow (⩾500 mL/min) and a poorly accessible cannulation zone. Cohort 2 included patients who underwent AVF creation and implantation of Arks at time of initial surgery. For both Cohorts, clinical need determined if one or two Arks were implanted. The primary endpoint was effective initial cannulation of the access site after Ark implantation. The secondary endpoint was continued access of the Ark cannulation zone for hemodialysis and evaluation of device or procedure-related adverse events collected for 6 months post-implantation. The exploratory endpoint evaluated the Ark implantation procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 13 patients, 2 were withdrawn prior to initial cannulation through the Ark-1 patient due to an exacerbated baseline condition and the other patient due to loss of follow-up. In the efficacy analysis, 11 of 13 treated patients demonstrated successful primary and secondary outcomes. Of the 11 treated patients who initiated cannulation through the Arks, 100% experienced successful primary and secondary outcomes. None of the patients experienced adverse events related to the Ark and surgeons had the necessary skills to implant Arks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrated the Ark could be used successfully in End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients undergoing hemodialysis three times a week. These results suggest preliminary safety and efficacy of the Ark as a promising cannulation tool for dialysis vascular access and warrant further exploration of long-term safety and effectiveness through a pivotal clinical study involving a larger population and extended follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11297298241302887\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241302887\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241302887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们报告方舟插管试验(ACT) I期早期可行性研究的6个月结果。本研究考察了Ark作为一种潜在的创新准入工具,通过靶向插管克服与插管相关的挑战,改善动静脉瘘(AVF)依赖性血液透析。方法:在这项首次人体介入、前瞻性、单臂、单部位调查中,13例患者接受了治疗。队列1包括在计划位置具有符合Ark植入标准的现有瘘管的患者,包括深度(4-15 mm),直径(大于或等于4 mm),流量(大于或等于500 mL/min)和难以接近的插管区。队列2包括在初始手术时进行AVF生成和Arks植入的患者。对于两个队列,临床需要决定是植入一个还是两个ark。主要终点是方舟植入后通道部位的有效初始插管。次要终点是继续进入Ark穿刺区进行血液透析,并评估植入后6个月收集的器械或手术相关不良事件。探索性终点评估方舟植入过程。结果:在13例患者中,2例患者由于基线情况恶化而在通过Ark-1进行初始插管前退出,另1例患者由于失去随访。在疗效分析中,13例治疗患者中有11例表现出成功的主要和次要结局。在11名通过方舟开始插管的患者中,100%的患者获得了成功的主要和次要结果。没有患者经历与方舟相关的不良事件,外科医生有必要的技能来植入方舟。结论:结果表明Ark可成功用于每周进行三次血液透析的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者。这些结果表明Ark作为一种有前途的透析血管通路插管工具的初步安全性和有效性,值得通过一项涉及更大人群和延长随访的关键临床研究进一步探索长期安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ACT I early feasibility study of the Voyager Ark vascular access device.

Objective: We report the 6-month outcomes of the Ark Cannulation Trial (ACT) I early feasibility study. This investigation examined the Ark as a potential innovative access tool for overcoming cannulation-related challenges and improving arteriovenous fistula (AVF) dependent hemodialysis through targeted cannulation.

Methods: During this first-in-human, interventional, prospective, single arm, single site investigation, 13 patients were treated. Cohort 1 included patients with existing fistulas meeting the criteria for Ark implantation at planned sites, including depth (4-15 mm), diameter (⩾4 mm), flow (⩾500 mL/min) and a poorly accessible cannulation zone. Cohort 2 included patients who underwent AVF creation and implantation of Arks at time of initial surgery. For both Cohorts, clinical need determined if one or two Arks were implanted. The primary endpoint was effective initial cannulation of the access site after Ark implantation. The secondary endpoint was continued access of the Ark cannulation zone for hemodialysis and evaluation of device or procedure-related adverse events collected for 6 months post-implantation. The exploratory endpoint evaluated the Ark implantation procedure.

Results: Of 13 patients, 2 were withdrawn prior to initial cannulation through the Ark-1 patient due to an exacerbated baseline condition and the other patient due to loss of follow-up. In the efficacy analysis, 11 of 13 treated patients demonstrated successful primary and secondary outcomes. Of the 11 treated patients who initiated cannulation through the Arks, 100% experienced successful primary and secondary outcomes. None of the patients experienced adverse events related to the Ark and surgeons had the necessary skills to implant Arks.

Conclusion: The results demonstrated the Ark could be used successfully in End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients undergoing hemodialysis three times a week. These results suggest preliminary safety and efficacy of the Ark as a promising cannulation tool for dialysis vascular access and warrant further exploration of long-term safety and effectiveness through a pivotal clinical study involving a larger population and extended follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Retraction: Novel electrospun polyurethane grafts for vascular access in rats. Feasibility and Safety of bedside placement of tunneled dialysis catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence. Retained foreign body in radial artery: Endovascular retrieval and salvage of a hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula. Role of renal vascular coordinator on access flow dysfunction: A quality improvement initiative on improving patency rate. Ultrasound and fluoroscopy co-guided removal of extravascular stripped central line guidewire fragments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1