围手术期过敏反应与外周插入中心导管相关:一项回顾性观察研究。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1177/11297298241303218
Zhenming Wu, Mengna Luo, Jielin Luo, Yandan Feng, Jia Li
{"title":"围手术期过敏反应与外周插入中心导管相关:一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Zhenming Wu, Mengna Luo, Jielin Luo, Yandan Feng, Jia Li","doi":"10.1177/11297298241303218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) is a commonly utilized medical device for long-term intravenous therapy in healthcare settings. However, there has been a notable increase in anaphylaxis associated with PICC catheterization, which should not be neglected.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose is to raise awareness about the occurrence of anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reactions associated with PICC and to emphasize the need to explore effective methods to prevent this emergency event in the future.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective observational study was conducted at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2021 and August 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>0.10% (13 out of 12,612) of cancer patients suffered from anaphylactic reactions during PICC catheterization. The duration time of anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reactions was approximately 8 min, with a range of 5-10 min. The signs and symptoms combined with respiratory and cardiovascular system symptoms. Most patients were relieved spontaneously by oxygen inhalation and completed catheterization after their symptoms were alleviated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The increasing incidence of anaphylaxis related to PICC catheterization necessitates greater awareness among healthcare providers. Further research is needed to identify the exact culprits during PICC insertion and develop effective strategies for preventing anaphylactic reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298241303218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative anaphylaxis associated with peripheral inserted central catheter: A retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Zhenming Wu, Mengna Luo, Jielin Luo, Yandan Feng, Jia Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298241303218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) is a commonly utilized medical device for long-term intravenous therapy in healthcare settings. However, there has been a notable increase in anaphylaxis associated with PICC catheterization, which should not be neglected.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose is to raise awareness about the occurrence of anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reactions associated with PICC and to emphasize the need to explore effective methods to prevent this emergency event in the future.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective observational study was conducted at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2021 and August 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>0.10% (13 out of 12,612) of cancer patients suffered from anaphylactic reactions during PICC catheterization. The duration time of anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reactions was approximately 8 min, with a range of 5-10 min. The signs and symptoms combined with respiratory and cardiovascular system symptoms. Most patients were relieved spontaneously by oxygen inhalation and completed catheterization after their symptoms were alleviated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The increasing incidence of anaphylaxis related to PICC catheterization necessitates greater awareness among healthcare providers. Further research is needed to identify the exact culprits during PICC insertion and develop effective strategies for preventing anaphylactic reactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11297298241303218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241303218\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241303218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外周插入中心导管(PICC)是医疗机构长期静脉治疗中常用的医疗设备。然而,与PICC置管相关的过敏反应显著增加,这一点不应被忽视。目的:目的是提高人们对PICC相关的过敏反应或类过敏反应的认识,并强调探索有效方法预防未来发生此类紧急事件的必要性。方法:这项回顾性观察性研究于2021年1月至2023年8月在中山大学癌症中心进行。结果:12612例癌症患者中有13例(0.10%)在PICC置管期间发生过敏反应。过敏反应或类过敏反应持续时间约为8 min,范围为5-10 min。体征和症状合并呼吸系统和心血管系统症状。大多数患者在症状缓解后,可通过吸氧自行缓解并完成置管。结论:与PICC置管相关的过敏反应发生率的增加需要卫生保健提供者提高认识。需要进一步的研究来确定PICC插入过程中的确切罪魁祸首,并制定有效的预防过敏反应的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perioperative anaphylaxis associated with peripheral inserted central catheter: A retrospective observational study.

Background: Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) is a commonly utilized medical device for long-term intravenous therapy in healthcare settings. However, there has been a notable increase in anaphylaxis associated with PICC catheterization, which should not be neglected.

Aims: The purpose is to raise awareness about the occurrence of anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reactions associated with PICC and to emphasize the need to explore effective methods to prevent this emergency event in the future.

Method: This retrospective observational study was conducted at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2021 and August 2023.

Results: 0.10% (13 out of 12,612) of cancer patients suffered from anaphylactic reactions during PICC catheterization. The duration time of anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reactions was approximately 8 min, with a range of 5-10 min. The signs and symptoms combined with respiratory and cardiovascular system symptoms. Most patients were relieved spontaneously by oxygen inhalation and completed catheterization after their symptoms were alleviated.

Conclusion: The increasing incidence of anaphylaxis related to PICC catheterization necessitates greater awareness among healthcare providers. Further research is needed to identify the exact culprits during PICC insertion and develop effective strategies for preventing anaphylactic reactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Retraction: Novel electrospun polyurethane grafts for vascular access in rats. Feasibility and Safety of bedside placement of tunneled dialysis catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence. Retained foreign body in radial artery: Endovascular retrieval and salvage of a hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula. Role of renal vascular coordinator on access flow dysfunction: A quality improvement initiative on improving patency rate. Ultrasound and fluoroscopy co-guided removal of extravascular stripped central line guidewire fragments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1