了解影响堕胎护理管理、获取和交付的州和地方政策:弗吉尼亚州的案例研究。

Rand health quarterly Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01
Julia Rollison, Skye A Miner, Maya Buenaventura, Rachel Holzer, Yoony Lee, Mekdes Shiferaw
{"title":"了解影响堕胎护理管理、获取和交付的州和地方政策:弗吉尼亚州的案例研究。","authors":"Julia Rollison, Skye A Miner, Maya Buenaventura, Rachel Holzer, Yoony Lee, Mekdes Shiferaw","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The patchwork of laws and regulations that affect abortion access in the United States has become increasingly complex since the 2022 <i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</i> U.S. Supreme Court decision that gave states the right to enact and enforce policies facilitating or restricting abortion access. The authors examined state, local, and institutional policies in Virginia-which is one of the only remaining states in the South post-<i>Dobbs</i> with legal access to abortion care past 13 weeks gestational age-to better understand how the policy landscape is influencing provision of care in the state. The authors reviewed existing legislation, bills, and sources detailing the policy landscape in Virginia and interviewed a sample of clinicians and nonclinicians working at organizations providing or supporting abortion care. The study principally focused on state laws, local policies and actions, institutional policies, and reported implementation experiences affecting access to abortion care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74637,"journal":{"name":"Rand health quarterly","volume":"12 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the State and Local Policies Affecting Abortion Care Administration, Access, and Delivery: A Case Study in Virginia.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Rollison, Skye A Miner, Maya Buenaventura, Rachel Holzer, Yoony Lee, Mekdes Shiferaw\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The patchwork of laws and regulations that affect abortion access in the United States has become increasingly complex since the 2022 <i>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</i> U.S. Supreme Court decision that gave states the right to enact and enforce policies facilitating or restricting abortion access. The authors examined state, local, and institutional policies in Virginia-which is one of the only remaining states in the South post-<i>Dobbs</i> with legal access to abortion care past 13 weeks gestational age-to better understand how the policy landscape is influencing provision of care in the state. The authors reviewed existing legislation, bills, and sources detailing the policy landscape in Virginia and interviewed a sample of clinicians and nonclinicians working at organizations providing or supporting abortion care. The study principally focused on state laws, local policies and actions, institutional policies, and reported implementation experiences affecting access to abortion care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rand health quarterly\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630096/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rand health quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rand health quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2022年美国最高法院就多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案作出裁决以来,影响美国堕胎准入的法律法规的拼凑性变得越来越复杂,该裁决赋予各州制定和执行促进或限制堕胎准入的政策的权利。作者考察了弗吉尼亚州的州、地方和机构政策——该州是多布斯事件后南方仅有的几个可以合法获得胎龄超过13周的堕胎护理的州之一——以便更好地了解政策格局如何影响该州的护理服务。作者回顾了弗吉尼亚州现有的立法、法案和详细介绍政策前景的资料,并采访了在提供或支持堕胎护理的组织工作的临床医生和非临床医生的样本。该研究主要侧重于州法律、地方政策和行动、机构政策以及报告的影响获得堕胎护理的实施经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the State and Local Policies Affecting Abortion Care Administration, Access, and Delivery: A Case Study in Virginia.

The patchwork of laws and regulations that affect abortion access in the United States has become increasingly complex since the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization U.S. Supreme Court decision that gave states the right to enact and enforce policies facilitating or restricting abortion access. The authors examined state, local, and institutional policies in Virginia-which is one of the only remaining states in the South post-Dobbs with legal access to abortion care past 13 weeks gestational age-to better understand how the policy landscape is influencing provision of care in the state. The authors reviewed existing legislation, bills, and sources detailing the policy landscape in Virginia and interviewed a sample of clinicians and nonclinicians working at organizations providing or supporting abortion care. The study principally focused on state laws, local policies and actions, institutional policies, and reported implementation experiences affecting access to abortion care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Annual Trends Among the Unsheltered in Three Los Angeles Neighborhoods: The Los Angeles Longitudinal Enumeration and Demographic Survey (LA LEADS) 2023 Annual Report. America's Military and Veteran Caregivers: Hidden Heroes Emerging from the Shadows. Health and Social Services During Heat Events: Demand for Services in Los Angeles County. Perspectives of America's Military and Veteran Caregivers: A Qualitative Exploration. Process Evaluation of the Los Angeles County Rapid Diversion Program: A Pretrial Mental Health Diversion Program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1